DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Common Sites, Etiology, and Solutions of Persistent Septal Deviation in Revision Septoplasty

  • Jin, Hong Ryul (Dr. Jin's Premium Nose Clinic) ;
  • Kim, Dae Woo (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center) ;
  • Jung, Hahn Jin (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2017.12.18
  • Accepted : 2018.05.18
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

Objectives. To investigate the common causes of persistent septal deviation in revision septoplasty and to report the surgical techniques and results to correct them. Methods. A total of 100 consecutive patients (86 males) who had revision septoplasty due to persistent septal deviation from 2008 and 2014 were included in the study. Their mean age was 35.6 years and the mean follow-up duration was 9.1 months. Presenting symptoms, sites of persistent septal deviation, techniques used to correct the deviation, and surgical results were reviewed. Results. The mean interval between primary and revision surgery was 6.2 years. Forty-eight patients received revision septoplasty and 52 received revision septoplasty combined with rhinoplasty. Nasal obstruction was the most presenting symptom in almost all patients. The most common site of persistent septal deviation was middle septum (58%) followed by caudal septum (31%). Correcting techniques included further chondrotomy and excision of deviated portion in 76% and caudal batten graft in 39%. Rhinoscopic and endoscopic exams showed straight septum in 97% and 92 patients had subjective symptom improvement postoperatively. Conclusion. Middle septum and caudal septum were common sites of persistent deviation. Proper chondrotomy with excision of deviated middle septum and correction of the caudal deviation with batten graft are key maneuvers to treat persistent deviation.

Keywords

References

  1. Uppal S, Mistry H, Nadig S, Back G, Coatesworth A. Evaluation of patient benefit from nasal septal surgery for nasal obstruction. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2005 Jun;32(2):129-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2005.01.006
  2. Gillman GS, Egloff AM, Rivera-Serrano CM. Revision septoplasty: a prospective disease-specific outcome study. Laryngoscope. 2014 Jun;124(6):1290-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24356
  3. Siegel NS, Gliklich RE, Taghizadeh F, Chang Y. Outcomes of septoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Feb;122(2):228-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(00)70244-0
  4. Illum P. Septoplasty and compensatory inferior turbinate hypertrophy: long-term results after randomized turbinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1997 Jan;254 Suppl 1:S89-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02439733
  5. Fjermedal O, Saunte C, Pedersen S. Septoplasty and/or submucous resection? 5 Years nasal septum operations. J Laryngol Otol. 1988 Sep;102(9):796-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100106486
  6. Lee BJ, Chung YS, Jang YJ. Overcorrected septum as a complication of septoplasty. Am J Rhinol. 2004 Nov-Dec;18(6):393-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/194589240401800610
  7. Becker SS, Dobratz EJ, Stowell N, Barker D, Park SS. Revision septoplasty: review of sources of persistent nasal obstruction. Am J Rhinol. 2008 Jul-Aug;22(4):440-4. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3200
  8. Dinis PB, Haider H. Septoplasty: long-term evaluation of results. Am J Otolaryngol. 2002 Mar-Apr;23(2):85-90. https://doi.org/10.1053/ajot.2002.30987
  9. Sedwick JD, Lopez AB, Gajewski BJ, Simons RL. Caudal septoplasty for treatment of septal deviation: aesthetic and functional correction of the nasal base. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005 May-Jun;7(3):158-62. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.7.3.158
  10. Murakami WT, Wong LW, Davidson TM. Applications of the biomechanical behavior of cartilage to nasal septoplastic surgery. Laryngoscope. 1982 Mar;92(3):300-9.
  11. Heo SJ, Kim JS. Crosshatching incision technique in septoplasty: experimental outcomes under actual surgical settings. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016 Oct;43(5):518-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2015.12.010
  12. Ozyazgan I, Idaci O. A new method that uses cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive to fill scoring incisions in septal cartilage correction. Laryngoscope. 2011 Jun;121(6):1164-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21738
  13. Min YG, Chung JW. Cartilaginous incisions in septoplasty. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1996 Jan-Feb;58(1):51-4. https://doi.org/10.1159/000276796
  14. Wee JH, Lee JE, Cho SW, Jin HR. Septal batten graft to correct cartilaginous deformities in endonasal septoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 May;138(5):457-61. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2012.650
  15. Chung YS, Seol JH, Choi JM, Shin DH, Kim YW, Cho JH, et al. How to resolve the caudal septal deviation? Clinical outcomes after septoplasty with bony batten grafting. Laryngoscope. 2014 Aug;124(8):1771-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24491
  16. Haack J, Papel ID. Caudal septal deviation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009 Jun;42(3):427-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2009.03.005

Cited by

  1. Use of a crossing suture to correct caudal septal deviations vol.9, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22347
  2. Triangular excision and submucosal rejoining to correct horizontally folded caudal nasal septum vol.9, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22378
  3. Crosshatching Incision in Septoplasty: Abandoning an Old Myth vol.13, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2019.01767
  4. Septal Cartilage Traction Suture Technique for Correction of Caudal Septal Deviation vol.130, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28516
  5. Effectiveness of the TnR Nasal Mesh® for the Correction of Caudal Septal Deviation vol.31, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.35420/jcohns.2020.31.2.205
  6. Evaluation of the Esthetic and Functional Outcomes of Extracorporeal Septoplasty for Rhinoplasty in Asian Patients vol.14, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2019.01704