참고문헌
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:7-30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21387
- Disaia PJ, Creasman WT, Mannel RS, McMeekin DS, Mutch DG. Clinical gynecologic oncology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2017.
- Nougaret S, Addley HC, Colombo PE, Fujii S, Al Sharif SS, Tirumani SH, et al. Ovarian carcinomatosis: how the radiologist can help plan the surgical approach. Radiographics 2012;32:1775-800. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.326125511
- Suppiah S, Chang WL, Hassan HA, Kaewput C, Asri AA, Saad FF, et al. Systematic review on the accuracy of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in the management of ovarian cancer: Is functional information really needed? World J Nucl Med 2017;16:176-85. https://doi.org/10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_31_17
- Yoshida Y, Kurokawa T, Kawahara K, Tsuchida T, Okazawa H, Fujibayashi Y, et al. Incremental benefits of FDG positron emission tomography over CT alone for the preoperative staging of ovarian cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:227-33. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.182.1.1820227
- Michielsen K, Vergote I, Op de Beeck K, Amant F, Leunen K, Moerman P, et al. Whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequence for staging of patients with suspected ovarian cancer: a clinical feasibility study in comparison to CT and FDG-PET/CT. Eur Radiol 2014;24:889-901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-3083-8
-
Signorelli M, Guerra L, Pirovano C, Crivellaro C, Fruscio R, Buda A, et al. Detection of nodal metastases by
$^{18}F$ -FDG PET/CT in apparent early stage ovarian cancer: a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol 2013;131:395-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.08.022 -
Schmidt S, Meuli RA, Achtari C, Prior JO. Peritoneal carcinomatosis in primary ovarian cancer staging: comparison between MDCT, MRI, and
$^{18}F$ -FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 2015;40:371-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000000768 - Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Kaji Y, Fukasawa I, Inaba N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in staging ovarian cancer: comparison with enhanced CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35:1912-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0890-2
- Hynninen J, Kemppainen J, Lavonius M, Virtanen J, Matomaki J, Oksa S, et al. A prospective comparison of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT for pretreatment imaging of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013;131:389-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.08.023
- Nam EJ, Yun MJ, Oh YT, Kim JW, Kim JH, Kim S, et al. Diagnosis and staging of primary ovarian cancer: correlation between PET/CT, Doppler US, and CT or MRI. Gynecol Oncol 2010;116:389-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.10.059
-
Funicelli L, Travaini LL, Landoni F, Trifiro G, Bonello L, Bellomi M. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer: the role of CT and [
$^{18}F$ ]FDG-PET/CT. Abdom Imaging 2010;35:701-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9578-8 -
Castellucci P, Perrone AM, Picchio M, Ghi T, Farsad M, Nanni C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 1
$^{18}F$ -FDG PET/CT in characterizing ovarian lesions and staging ovarian cancer: correlation with transvaginal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and histology. Nucl Med Commun 2007;28:589-95. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0b013e3281afa256 - Dauwen H, Van Calster B, Deroose CM, Op de Beeck K, Amant F, Neven P, et al. PET/CT in the staging of patients with a pelvic mass suspicious for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013;131:694-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.08.020
-
Narayanan P, Sahdev A. The role of
$^{18}F$ -FDG PET CT in common gynaecological malignancies. Br J Radiol 2017;90:20170283. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170283 - Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
- Meinhold-Heerlein I, Fotopoulou C, Harter P, Kurzeder C, Mustea A, Wimberger P, et al. Statement by the Kommission Ovar of the AGO: the new FIGO and WHO classifications of ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015;75:1021-7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1558079
- Cantuaria G, Fagotti A, Ferrandina G, Magalhaes A, Nadji M, Angioli R, et al. GLUT-1 expression in ovarian carcinoma: association with survival and response to chemotherapy. Cancer 2001;92:1144-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1144::AID-CNCR1432>3.0.CO;2-T
- Kurokawa T, Yoshida Y, Kawahara K, Tsuchida T, Okazawa H, Fujibayashi Y, et al. Expression of GLUT-1 glucose transfer, cellular proliferation activity and grade of tumor correlate with [F-18]-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography in epithelial tumors of the ovary. Int J Cancer 2004;109:926-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20057
- Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:529-36. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
- Chong GO, Jeong SY, Park SH, Lee YH, Lee SW, Hong DG, et al. Comparison of the prognostic value of F-18 pet metabolic parameters of primary tumors and regional lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who are treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. PLoS One 2015;10:e0137743. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137743
- Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:882-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016
- Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. [Internet]. London: The Cochrane Collaboration; c2017 [cited 2017 Nov 15]. Available from: http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_9/9_5_2_identifying_and_measuring_heterogeneity.htm.
- Fagan TJ. Letter: nomogram for Bayes theorem. N Engl J Med 1975;293:257.
- Howlade N, Noone A, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K, Kosary C, et al. Seer cancer statistics review, 1975-2014. [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; c2017 [cited 2018 Jan 8]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2014/.
- De Iaco P, Musto A, Orazi L, Zamagni C, Rosati M, Allegri V, et al. FDG-PET/CT in advanced ovarian cancer staging: value and pitfalls in detecting lesions in different abdominal and pelvic quadrants compared with laparoscopy. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:e98-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.013
- Shim SH, Lee SJ, Kim SO, Kim SN, Kim DY, Lee JJ, et al. Nomogram for predicting incomplete cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 2015;136:30-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.004
- Gu P, Pan LL, Wu SQ, Sun L, Huang G. CA 125, PET alone, PET-CT, CT and MRI in diagnosing recurrent ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2009;71:164-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.019
- Yuan Y, Gu ZX, Tao XF, Liu SY. Computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:1002-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.112
- Falcetta FS, Lawrie TA, Medeiros LR, da Rosa MI, Edelweiss MI, Stein AT, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for FIGO stage I ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;10:CD005344.
- Brun JL, Rouzier R, Uzan S, Darai E. External validation of a laparoscopic-based score to evaluate resectability of advanced ovarian cancers: clues for a simplified score. Gynecol Oncol 2008;110:354-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.04.042
- Koo YJ, Kim JE, Kim YH, Hahn HS, Lee IH, Kim TJ, et al. Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for the management of early-stage ovarian cancer: surgical and oncological outcomes. J Gynecol Oncol 2014;25:111-7. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2014.25.2.111
- Abu-Rustum NR, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, DiClemente MJ, Bekker G, Gemignani M, et al. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection using the argon-beam coagulator and monopolar instruments: an 8-year study and description of technique. Gynecol Oncol 2003;89:504-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00154-9
- Khiewvan B, Torigian DA, Emamzadehfard S, Paydary K, Salavati A, Houshmand S, et al. An update on the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI in ovarian cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;44:1079-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3638-z
피인용 문헌
- Fluorescent Polymer Dots for Tracking SKOV3 Cells in Living Mice with Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy vol.21, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-019-01343-4
- Is 18 F-FDG PET/CT an Accurate Way to Detect Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.2020, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5439378
- Performance of Multiparametric Functional Imaging to Assess Peritoneal Tumor Burden in Ovarian Cancer vol.46, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/rlu.0000000000003785
- Prognostic significance of bone marrow FDG uptake in patients with gynecological cancer vol.11, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81298-1