DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Suggested Protocol for Efficient Medical Image Information Exchange in Korea: Breast MRI

효율적 의료영상정보교류를 위한 프로토콜 제안: 유방자기공명영상

  • Park, Ji Hee (Department of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Seon-Hyeong (Department of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sungjun (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yong, Hwan Seok (Department of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Woo, Hyunsik (Department of Radiology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jin, Kwang Nam (Department of Radiology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jeong, Woo Kyoung (Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Na-Young (Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Choi, Moon Hyung (Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Jung, Seung Eun (Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 박지희 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 최선형 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 김성준 (연세대학교 의과대학 강남세브란스병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 용환석 (고려대학교 의과대학 고려대학교 구로병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 우현식 (서울대학교 의과대학 서울특별시립 보라매병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 진광남 (서울대학교 의과대학 서울특별시립 보라매병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 정우경 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 신나영 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 서울성모병원 방사선과) ;
  • 최문형 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 서울성모병원 방사선과) ;
  • 정승은 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 서울성모병원 방사선과)
  • Received : 2018.03.06
  • Accepted : 2018.08.07
  • Published : 2018.11.01

Abstract

Purpose: Establishment of an appropriate protocol for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the study of image quality standards to enhance the effectiveness of medical image information exchange, which is part of the construction and activation of clinical information exchange for healthcare informatization. Materials and Methods: The recommended protocols of breast and MRI scans were reviewed and the questionnaire was prepared by a responsible researcher. Then, a panel of 9 breast dedicated radiologists was set up in Korea. The expert panel conducted a total of three Delphi agreements to draw up a consensus on the breast MRI protocol. Results: The agreed breast MRI recommendation protocol is a 1.5 Tesla or higher device that acquires images with prone position using a breast dedicated coil and includes T2-weighted and pre-contrast T1-weighted images. Contrast enhancement images are acquired at least two times, and include 60-120 seconds between images and after 4 minutes. The contrast enhancement T1-weighted image should be less than 3 mm in thickness, less than 120 seconds in temporal resolution, and less than $1.5mm^2$ in-plane pixel resolution. Conclusion: The Delphi agreement of the domestic breast imaging specialist group has established the recommendation protocol of the effective breast MRI.

목적: 보건의료정보화를 위한 진료정보교류 기반 구축 및 활성화 과제의 일부인 의료영상정보교류의 효용성을 높이기 위한 영상 품질 기준 연구에서 유방 자기공명영상검사의 적절한 프로토콜을 정립한다. 대상과 방법: 문헌 및 참고자료를 통한 국내외 유방 자기공명영상검사의 권고 프로토콜과 판독문 형식을 조사하고, 책임연구자가 설문지를 작성한 후, 국내 9명의 유방영상의학 전문가를 섭외하여 패널을 구성하였다. 전문가 패널은 총 3차례의 델파이 합의를 진행하여 유방자기공명영상 프로토콜의 합의안을 도출하였다. 결과: 합의된 유방자기공명영상 권고 프로토콜은 1.5 테슬라 이상의 기기로 유방 전용 코일을 사용하여 복와위 자세에서 영상을 획득하며, T2 강조영상과 조영 전 T1 강조영상을 포함한다. 조영증강영상은 적어도 2차례 이상 획득하며, 60~120초 사이 영상과 4분 이후 영상을 포함한다. 또한 조영증강 T1 강조영상의 절편 두께는 3 mm 이하, 측면 해상력은 120초 이하, 공간 내 평면 해상도는 $1.5mm^2$ 이하여야 한다. 결론: 국내 유방영상전문가 집단의 3차례에 걸친 델파이 합의를 통하여 효율적인 유방 자기공명영상검사의 검사 프로토콜 권고안을 정립하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Grant : 보건의료정보화를 위한 진료정보교류 기반 구축 및 활성화

Supported by : 한국보건산업진흥원

References

  1. Jung SE. CT examination and retest Guidelines. Korean Society of Radiology, 2013
  2. Hwang J, Paik SH, Park JS, Lee H. Clinical significance of short-term repeat computed tomography examination on the same anatomic region. J Korean Soc Radiol 2017;77:157-165 https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2017.77.3.157
  3. Americal College of Radiology (ACR) Accreditation Breast MRI. Available at: https://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Accreditation/BreastMRI. Accessed Jul 15, 2017
  4. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, Decker T, Federico M, Gilbert FJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:1296-1316 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015
  5. Mann RM, Balleyguier C, Baltzer PA, Bick U, Colin C, Cornford E, et al. Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women's information. Eur Radiol 2015;25:3669-3678 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3807-z
  6. Bae MS, Lee SH, Chu AJ, Shin SU, Ryu HS, Moon WK. Preoperative MR imaging in women with breast cancer detected at screening US. Radiology 2017;282:681-689 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016160706
  7. Kuhl CK. Current status of breast MR imaging. part 2. Clinical applications. Radiology 2007;244:672-691 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2443051661
  8. Abramovici G, Mainiero MB. Screening breast MR imaging: comparison of interpretation of baseline and annual follow-up studies. Radiology 2011;259:85-91 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10101009
  9. Hendrick RE. High-quality breast MRI. Radiol Clin North Am 2014;52:547-562 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2013.12.002
  10. Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging. part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 2007;244:356-378 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2442051620

Cited by

  1. Breast Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) Guideline: Breast Imaging Study Group of Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Recommendations vol.22, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13104/imri.2018.22.4.205