DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

성인과 소아 CT 촬영시 IR 적용에 따른 영상화질 및 선량에 미치는 영향

Effect of Image quality and Radiation Dose using Iterative Reconstruction in Adult and Pediatric CT: A Phantom Study

  • Ju, A-ran (Department of Radiological Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Jo, Jung-Hyun (Department of Radiological Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Oh, Young-Kyu (Department of Radiological Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Kim, Kyoung-Ki (Department of Radiological Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Lee, Soo-Been (Department of Radiological Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Jeon, Pil-Hyun (Department of Radiology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Daehong (Department of Radiological Science, Eulji University)
  • 투고 : 2018.05.23
  • 심사 : 2018.06.17
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30

초록

The main issue of CT is radiation dose reduction to patient. The purpose of this study was to estimate the image quality and dose by iterative reconstruction (IR) for adults and pediatrics. Adult and pediatric images of phantom were obtained with 120 and 140 kV, respectively, in accordance with radiation dose in terms of volume CT dose index ($CTDI_{vol}$): 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 mGy. Then, the adult and the pediatric images are reconstructed by filtered-backprojection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR). The images were analyzed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). SNR is improved when IR and 140 kV are applied to acquire adult and pediatric images. In the adult abdomen, according to diagnostic reference level, the SNR values of bone were increased about 27.84 % and 27.77 % at 120 kV and 140 kV, and the tissue's SNR values of the IR were increased about 29.84 % and 33.46 % 120 and 140 kV, respectively. Dose is reduced to 40% in adults abdomen images when using IR reconstruction. In pediatric images, the bone's SNR were also increased about 17.70% and 18.17 % at 120 kV and 140 kV. The tissue's SNR were increased about 26.73 % and 26.15 % at 120 kV and 140 kV. Radiation dose is reduced from 30% to 50% for bone and tissue images. In the case of examinations for adult and pediatric CT, IR technique reduces radiation dose to patient, and it could be applied to adult and pediatric imaging.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. American College of Radiology (2002). ACR Practice Guideline for Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical X-ray Imaging. American College of Radiology.
  2. Brenner, D. J. and Elliston, C. D. (2004). Estimated Radiation Risks Potentially Associated with Full-Body CT Screening. Radiology, 232(3), 735-738. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2323031095
  3. Bruyant, P. P. (2002). Analytic and iterative reconstruction algorithms in SPECT. J. Nucl. Med., 43(10), 1343-1358.
  4. Cody, D. D., Moxley, D. M., Krugh, K. T., O'Daniel, J. C., Wagner, L. K., and Eftekhari, F. (2004). Strategies for formulating appropriate MDCT techniques when imaging the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in pediatric patients. Am. J. Roentgenol., 182(4), 849-859. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.182.4.1820849
  5. Donnelly, L. F., and Frush, D. P. (2003). Pediatric multidetector body CT. Radiol. Clin. N. Am., 41(3), 637-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-8389(03)00036-8
  6. Goo, H., W. and Suh, D. S. (2006). Tube current reduction in pediatric non-ECG-gated heart CT by combined tube current modulation. Pediatr. Radiol., 36(4), 344-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-0105-y
  7. Greess, H., Nomayr, A., Wolf, H., Baum, U., Lell, M., Bowing, B., Kalender, W., and Bautz, W. A. (2002). Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose). Eur. Radiol., 12(6), 1571-1576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-001-1255-4
  8. Hara, A. K., Paden, R. G., Silva, A. C., Kujak, J. L., Lawder H. J., and Pavlicek, W. (2009). Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. Am. J. Roentgenol., 193(3), 764-771. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2397
  9. Kalra, M. K., Maher, M. M., Toth, T. L., Hamberg, L. M., Blake, M. A., Shepard, J. A., and Saini, S. (2004). Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology, 230(3), 619-628. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2303021726
  10. Lange, K., and Carson, R. (1984). EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr, 8(2), 306-316.
  11. Lee, J. K., Jang, S. J., and Jang, Y. I. (2014). Medical Radiation Exposure in Children CT and Dose Reduction. J. Korea. Cont. Assoc., 14(1), 356-363. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.01.356
  12. Payne, J. T. (2005). CT radiation dose and image quality. Radiol. Clin. North. Am., 43(6), 953-962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2005.07.002
  13. Vardi, Y., Shepp, L. A., and Kaufman, L. (1985). A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 80(389), 34-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1985.10477126
  14. Xu, J., Mahesh, M., and Tsui, B. M. W. (2009). Is iterative Reconstruction Ready for MDCT?. J. Am. Coll. Radiol., 6(4), 274-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2008.12.014
  15. You, J., Zeng, G. L., and Liang, Z. (2005). FBP algorithm for Attenuated Fan-Beam Projections. Invers Probl., 21(5), 1179-92. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/21/3/023
  16. Yoo, B. G., Lee, J. S., Jang, K. J., Jeon, S. H., Kim, Y. S., and Kweon, D. C., (2007). Comparison Radiation Dose of Z-Axis Automatic Tube Current Modulation Technique with Fixed Tube Current Multi-Detector Row CT Scanning of Lower Extremity Venography. J. Radiol, Prot., 32(3), 123-133.