Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

  • 제18권5호
  • /
  • Pages.277-285
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2383-9309(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-9317(eISSN)
대한치과마취과학회 (The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

New treatment method for pain and reduction of local anesthesia use in deep caries

  • Yun, Jihye (Department of Pediatric dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Shim, Youn-Soo (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Sunmoon University) ;
  • Park, So-Young (Department of Dental Hygiene, Wonkwang Health Science University) ;
  • An, So-Youn (Department of Pediatric dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 투고 : 2018.10.11
  • 심사 : 2018.10.24
  • 발행 : 2018.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Chemo-mechanical caries removal methods are known to be more effective compared with conventional methods in pain reduction. $Carie-care^{TM}$, a chemo-mechanical caries removal agent, was introduced in 2010 but a systematic review of its efficacy has not yet been performed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of $Carie-care^{TM}$ on the outcomes of treatment of caries in children and adolescents. The primary outcome was pain while the secondary outcomes included complete caries removal (CCR), time, need for local anesthesia and behavioral response changes. A Comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to 30 September 2018. The following keywords were used in the search: 'chemo-mechanical caries removal agent', 'dental caries', 'Carie-care', 'chemo-mechanical caries removal', 'chemo-mechanical caries excavation', other related keywords, and their combinations. From 942 studies identified, 16 were analyzed. Finally, 4 studies met the eligibility criteria and 260 teeth in 120 children and adolescents were included in this review. This review showed that $Carie-care^{TM}$ reduces pain during caries treatment but requires a longer time for effective treatment than conventional methods. Local anesthesia was not required in the Chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) group. In addition, dental anxiety decreased compared to the control group, and co-operation was more positive. Therefore, it may be a useful alternative to conventional methods in children and adolescents, but further verification through additional studies is needed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Geetha Priya PR, Asokan S, John JB, Punithavathy R, Karthick K. Comparison of behavioral response to caries removal methods: a randomised controlled cross over trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014; 32: 48-52. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.127055
  2. Moore R, Birn H, Kirkegaard E, Brodsgaard I, Scheutz F. Prevalence and characteristics of dental anxiety in Danish adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21: 292-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1993.tb00777.x
  3. Kim AH, Ahn ES, An SY. Factors affecting dental fear in Korean adolescents. J Korean Dent Sci 2017; 10: 22-8.
  4. Bussadori SK, Castro LC, Galvao AC. Papain gel: a new chemo-mechanical caries removal agent. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005; 30: 115-9.
  5. Shovelton DS. The maintenance of pulp vitality. Br Dent J 1972; 133: 95-101. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802880
  6. Banerjee A, Watson TF, Kidd EA. Dentine caries excavation: a review of current clinical techniques. Br Dent J 2000; 188: 476-82. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800515
  7. Maru VP, Shakuntala BS, Nagarathna C. Caries removal by chemomechanical (CarisolvTM) vs. rotary drill: a systematic review. Open Dent J 2015; 31: 462-72.
  8. Chowdhry S, Saha S, Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Garg A, Chowdhry P. Recent vs conventional methods of caries removal: a comparative in vivo study in pediatric patients. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 8: 6-11. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1275
  9. Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Gupta M, Verma L. Various methods of caries removal in children: a comparative clinical study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2007; 25: 93-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.33456
  10. Motta LJ, Bussadori SK, Campanelli AP, da Silva AL, Alfaya TA, de Godoy CH, et al. Pain during removal of carious lesions in children: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Dent 2013; 2013: 896381.
  11. Nadanovsky P, Cohen Carneiro F, Souza de Mello F. Removal of caries using only hand instruments: a comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods. Caries Res 2001; 35: 384-9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047478
  12. Lai G, Lara Capi C, Cocco F, Cagetti MG, Lingstrom P, Almhojd U, et al. Comparison of Carisolv system vs traditional rotating instruments for caries removal in the primary dentition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand 2015; 73: 569-80. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2015.1023353
  13. Hamama HH, Yiu CK, Burrow MF, King NM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on chemomechanical caries removal. Oper Dent 2015; 40: e167-78. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-021-LIT
  14. Li R, Zhao Y, Ye L. How to make choice of the carious removal methods, Carisolv or traditional drilling? a metaanalysis. J Oral Rehabil 2014; 41: 432-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12161
  15. Deng Y, Feng G, Hu B, Kuang Y, Song J. Effects of Papacarie on children with dental caries in primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent 2018; 28: 361-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12364
  16. Keenan AV, Congiusta MA. Efficacy of using Carisolv in the removal of decayed tooth structure in primary teeth. Evid Based Dent 2016; 17: 44-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401167
  17. Goyal PA, Kumari R, Kannan VP, Madhu S. Efficacy and tolerance of papain gel with conventional drilling method: a clinico-microbiological study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 39: 109-12. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.39.2.n25754863557k727
  18. Kavvadia K, Karagianni V, Polychronopoulou A, Papagiannouli L. Primary teeth caries removal using the Carisolv chemomechanical method: a clinical trial. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26: 23-8.
  19. Rajakumar S, Mungara J, Joseph E, Philip J, Shilpa Priya MP. Evaluation of three different caries removal techniques in children: a comparative clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013; 38: 23-6. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.38.1.p3324121m66n1737
  20. Maragakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwig E. Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars and its acceptance by patients. Caries Res 2001; 35: 205-10. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047457
  21. Martins MD, Fernandes KP, Motta LJ, Santos EM, Pavesi VC, Bussadori SK. Biocompatibility analysis of chemomechanical caries removal material Papacarie on cultured fibroblasts and subcutaneous tissue. J Dent Child 2009; 76: 123-9.
  22. Nagaveni NB, Radhika NB, Satisha TS, Ashwini KS, Neni S, Gupta S. Efficacy of new chemomechanical caries removal agent compared with conventional method in primary teeth: An in vivo study. Int J Oral Health Sci 2016; 6: 52-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-6027.199986
  23. Venkataraghavan K, Kush A, Lakshminarayana C, Diwakar L, Ravikumar P, Patil S, et al. Chemomechanical caries removal: a review & study of an indigenously developed agent (Carie $Care^{TM}$ gel) in children. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5: 84-90.
  24. Hegde RJ, Chaudhari S. Comparative evaluation of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods of caries excavation: an in vivo study. J Int Oral Health 2016; 8: 357-61.
  25. Pathivada L, Krishna MK, Kalra M, Vivekanandan G, Singh J, Navit S. Clinical evaluation of a papain-based gel for the chemo-mechanical removal of caries in children. Oral Health Dent Manag 2016; 15: 145-9.

피인용 문헌

  1. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature vol.7, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7010028
  2. Microneedles combined with a sticky and heatable hydrogel for local painless anesthesia vol.7, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9bm00482c
  3. Efficacy and Patient’s Acceptance of Alternative Methods for Caries Removal—A Systematic Review vol.9, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113407
  4. Needle tip deformation in local dental anesthesia – A technical note vol.126, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105034