Acknowledgement
Supported by : Tristel Italia Srl
References
- Sehulster LM, Chinn RYW, Arduino MJ, et al. Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. Recommendations from CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Chicago (IL): American Society for Healthcare Engineering/American Hospital Association; 2004.
- Edmonds JM. Efficient methods for large-area surface sampling of sites contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms and other hazardous agents: current state, needs, and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2009;84:811-816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2136-z
- Buttner MP, Cruz P, Stetzenbach LD, Cronin T. Evaluation of two surface sampling methods for detection of Erwinia herbicola on a variety of materials by culture and quantitative PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:3505-3510. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01825-06
- Edmonds JM, Collett PJ, Valdes ER, Skowronski EW, Pellar GJ, Emanuel PA. Surface sampling of spores in dry-deposition aerosols. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009;75:39-44. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01563-08
- Moore G, Griffith C. A comparison of traditional and recently developed methods for monitoring surface hygiene within the food industry: an industry trial. Int J Environ Health Res 2002;12:317-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960312021000056429
- Sanderson WT, Hein MJ, Taylor L, et al. Surface sampling methods for Bacillus anthracis spore contamination. Emerg Infect Dis 2002;8:1145-1151. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020382
- Vorst KL, Todd EC, Rysert ET. Improved quantitative recovery of Listeria monocytogenes from stainless steel surfaces using a one-ply composite tissue. J Food Prot 2004;67:2212-2217. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-67.10.2212
- Brown GS, Betty RG, Brockmann JE, et al. Evaluation of rayon swab surface sample collection method for Bacillus spores from nonporous surfaces. J Appl Microbiol 2007;103:1074-1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03331.x
- Downey AS, Da Silva SM, Olson ND, Filliben JJ, Morrow JB. Impact of processing method on recovery of bacteria from wipes used in biological surface sampling. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78:5872-5881. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00873-12
- Ruple-Czerniak A, Bolte DS, Burgess BA, Morley PS. Comparison of two sampling and culture systems for detection of Salmonella enterica in the environment of a large animal hospital. Equine Vet J 2014;46:499-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12193
- Bredholt S, Maukonen J, Kujanpaa K, et al. Microbial methods for assessment of cleaning and disinfection of food-processing surfaces cleaned in a low-pressure system. Eur Food Res Technol 1999;209:145-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002170050474
- Digestive Health Foundation. Infection control in endoscopy [Internet]. Sydney: Gastroenterological Society of Australia; c2008 [updated 2008 Feb; cited 2018 Jul 11]. Available from: http://cart.gesa.org.au/membes/files/Clinical%20Guidelines%20and%20Updates/Endoscopy_Microbiological_Testing.pdf.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Duodenoscope surveillance sampling & culturing: reducing the risks of infection [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): CDC; c2015 [updated 2018 Feb 28; cited 2018 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/cre/cre-duodenoscope-surveillance-protocol.html.
- Ministere de la sante et des solidarites. Elements d'assurance qualite en hygiene relatifs au controle microbiologique des endoscopes et a la tracabilite en endoscopie [Internet]. Paris: Societe Francaise d'Endoscopie Digestive; c2007 [cited 2018 Jul 11]. Available from: http://www.sfed.org/professionnels/commissions-et-actions/plateaux-techniques-qualite-hygiene-et-securite/qualite/textes.
- Bhatt JM, Peterson EM, Verma SP. Microbiological sampling of the forgotten components of a flexible fiberoptic laryngoscope: what lessons can we learn? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;150:235-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599813513424
- Elackattu A, Zoccoli M, Spiegel JH, Grundfast KM. A comparison of two methods for preventing cross-contamination when using flexible fiberoptic endoscopes in an otolaryngology clinic: disposable sterile sheaths versus immersion in germicidal liquid. Laryngoscope 2010;120:2410-2416. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21146
- Tzanidakis K, Choudhury N, Bhat S, Weerasinghe A, Marais J. Evaluation of disinfection of flexible nasendoscopes using Tristel wipes: a prospective single blind study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2012;94:185-188.
- Bhattacharyya N, Kepnes LJ. The effectiveness of immersion disinfection for flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:681-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2003.11.004
- Liming B, Funnell I, Jones A, Demons S, Marshall K, Harsha W. An evaluation of varying protocols for high-level disinfection of flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopes. Laryngoscope 2014;124:2498-2501. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24665
- International Organization for Standardization. ISO 11737-1:2006. Sterilization of medical devices -- microbiological methods -- part 1: determination of a population of microorganisms on products [Internet]. Geneva: ISO; c2006 [updated 2006 Apr; cited 2018 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/38711.html.
- European Committee for Standardization. EN 14347 - Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics - basic sporicidal activity - test method and requirements (phase 1, step 1). Brussels: European Standards; 2005.
- European Committee for Standardization. EN 13704 - Chemical disinfectants - quantitative suspension test for evaluation of sporicidal activity of chemical disinfectants used in food, industrial, domestic and institutional areas - test method and requirements (phase 2, step 1). Brussels: European Standards; 2002.
- International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TR 13843: Water quality - guidance on validation of microbiological methods [Internet]. Geneva: ISO; c2000 [updated 2000 Jun; cited 2018 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/22599.html.
- ASGE Quality Assurance In Endoscopy Committee, Petersen BT, Chennat J, et al. Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes: 2011. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:1075-1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1183
- Lee YK, Park JB. Steps of reprocessing and equipments. Clin Endosc 2013;46:274-279. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.3.274
- Beilenhoff U, Neumann CS, Rey JF, Biering H, Blum R, Schmidt V. ESGE-ESGENA guideline for quality assurance in reprocessing: microbiological surveillance testing in endoscopy. Endoscopy 2007;39:175-181. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-945181
- Saviuc P, Picot-Gueraud R, Shum Cheong Sing J, et al. Evaluation of the quality of reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:1017-1023. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2015.123
- Epstein L, Hunter JC, Arwady MA, et al. New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli associated with exposure to duodenoscopes. JAMA 2014;312:1447-1455. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.12720
- Muscarella LF. Prevention of disease transmission during flexible laryngoscopy. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:536-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2006.09.010
- Spaulding EH. Chemical disinfection and antisepsis in the hospital. J Hosp Res 1972;9:5-31.
- Collins WO. A review of reprocessing techniques of flexible nasopharyngoscopes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;141:307-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2009.05.027
- McDonnell G, Burke P. Disinfection: is it time to reconsider Spaulding? J Hosp Infect 2011;78:163-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2011.05.002
- Lutz JK, Crawford J, Hoet AE, Wilkins JR 3rd, Lee J. Comparative performance of contact plates, electrostatic wipes, swabs and a novel sampling device for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus on environmental surfaces. J Appl Microbiol 2013;115:171-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12230
- Rose LJ, Hodges L, O'Connell H, Noble-Wang J. National validation study of a cellulose sponge wipe-processing method for use after sampling Bacillus anthracis spores from surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011;77:8355-8359. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.05377-11
Cited by
- What is the Best Sampling Method to Monitor the Effect of Endoscopy Reprocessing? vol.51, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.146
- Using Microbiological Sampling to Evaluate the Efficacy of Nasofibroscope Disinfection: The Tristel Trio Wipes System in Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) Endoscopy vol.16, pp.22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224583
- A cost comparison between reusable flexible and disposable laryngoscopes vol.43, pp.2, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103321