Journal of Clinical Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (임상이비인후과)

The Busan, Ulsan, Gyeoungnam Branch of Korean Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회)
권호 표지

Animal Studies About Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of Thyroid Surgery

갑상선 수술 중 신경 감시에 대한 동물실험

  • Kwon, Oh Eun (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Eun, Young-Gyu (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
  • 권오은 (경희대학교 대학원 의학과) ;
  • 은영규 (경희대학교 대학원 의학과)
  • Published : 2018.12.30

⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Randolph GW, Dralle H, Abdullah H, Barczynski M, Bellantone R, Brauckhoff M, et al. Electrophysiologic recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during thyroid and parathyroid surgery: international standards guideline statement. Laryngoscope 2011;121 Suppl 1:S1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21119
  2. Duclos A, Lifante JC, Ducarroz S, Soardo P, Colin C, Peix JL. Influence of intraoperative neuromonitoring on surgeons' technique during thyroidectomy. World J Surg 2011;35(4):773-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-0963-4
  3. Chiang FY, Lee KW, Chen HC, Chen HY, Lu IC, Kuo WR, et al. Standardization of intraoperative neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid operation. World J Surg 2010;34(2):223-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0316-8
  4. Chiang FY, Lu IC, Kuo WR, Lee KW, Chang NC, Wu CW. The mechanism of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during thyroid surgery--the application of intraoperative neuromonitoring. Surgery 2008;143(6):743-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.02.006
  5. Wu CW, Dionigi G, Sun H, Liu X, Kim HY, Hsiao PJ, et al. Intraoperative neuromonitoring for the early detection and prevention of RLN traction injury in thyroid surgery: a porcine model. Surgery 2014;155(2):329-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.08.015
  6. Lee HY, Cho YG, You JY, Choi BH, Kim JY, Wu CW, et al. Traction injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve: Results of continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring in a swine model. Head Neck 2016;38(4):582-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23934
  7. Brauckhoff K, Svendsen OS, Stangeland L, Biermann M, Aas T, Husby PJA. Injury mechanisms and electromyographic changes after injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve: Experiments in a porcine model. Head Neck 2018;40(2):274-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24940
  8. Lamade W, Bechu M, Lauzana E, Kohler P, Klein S, Tuncer T, et al. The weepy nerve-different sensitivity of left and right recurrent laryngeal nerves under tensile stress in a porcine model. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2016;401(7):983-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1439-7
  9. Shen WT, Baumbusch MA, Kebebew E, Duh QY. Use of the electrothermal vessel sealing system versus standard vessel ligation in thyroidectomy. Asian J Surg 2005;28(2):86-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60268-2
  10. Lin YC, Dionigi G, Randolph GW, Lu IC, Chang PY, Tsai SY, et al. Electrophysiologic monitoring correlates of recurrent laryngeal nerve heat thermal injury in a porcine model. Laryngoscope 2015;125(8):E283-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25362
  11. Jiang K, Zhu Y, Zhou G, Ye Y, Xie Q, Yang X, et al. Safe distance between electrotome and recurrent laryngeal nerve: an experimental canine model. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8(1):770-5.
  12. Wu CW, Chai YJ, Dionigi G, Chiang FY, Liu X, Sun H, et al. Recurrent laryngeal nerve safety parameters of the Harmonic Focus during thyroid surgery: Porcine model using continuous monitoring. Laryngoscope 2015;125(12):2838-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25412
  13. Dionigi G, Chiang FY, Kim HY, Randolph GW, Mangano A, Chang PY, et al. Safety of LigaSure in recurrent laryngeal nerve dissection-porcine model using continuous monitoring. Laryngoscope 2017;127(7):1724-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26271
  14. Kwak HY, Dionigi G, Kim D, Lee HY, Son GS, Lee JB, et al. Thermal injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve by THUNDERBEAT during thyroid surgery: findings from continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring in a porcine model. J Surg Res 2016;200(1):177-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.066
  15. Yang X, Cao J, Yan Y, Liu F, Li T, Han L, et al. Comparison of the safety of electrotome, Harmonic scalpel, and LigaSure for management of thyroid surgery. Head Neck 2017;39(6):1078-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24701
  16. Merrill DR, Bikson M, Jefferys JG. Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. J Neurosci Methods 2005;141(2):171-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.020
  17. Li T, Zhou G, Yang Y, Gao ZD, Guo P, Shen ZL, et al. Identifying a Safe Range of Stimulation Current for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve: Results from a Canine Model. Chin Med J 2016;129(15):1830-4. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.186636
  18. Lu IC, Wang HM, Kuo YW, Shieh CF, Chiang FY, Wu CW, et al. Electromyographic study of differential sensitivity to succinylcholine of the diaphragm, laryngeal and somatic muscles: a swine model. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2010;26(12):640-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1607-551X(10)70098-X
  19. Lu IC, Chang PY, Hsu HT, Tseng KY, Wu CW, Lee KW, et al. A comparison between succinylcholine and rocuronium on the recovery profile of the laryngeal muscles during intraoperative neuromonitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve: a prospective porcine model. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2013;29(9):484-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2013.01.002
  20. Puram SV, Chow H, Wu CW, Heaton JT, Kamani D, Gorti G, et al. Vocal cord paralysis predicted by neural monitoring electrophysiologic changes with recurrent laryngeal nerve compressive neuropraxic injury in a canine model. Head Neck 2016;38Suppl 1:E1341-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24225
  21. Puram SV, Chow H, Wu CW, Heaton JT, Kamani D, Gorti G, et al. Posterior cricoarytenoid muscle electrophysiologic changes are predictive of vocal cord paralysis with recurrent laryngeal nerve compressive injury in a canine model. Laryngoscope 2016;126(12):2744-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25967
  22. Shin SC, Sung ES, Choi SW, Kim SD, Jung DW, Kim SH, et al. Feasibility and safety of nerve stimulator attachment to energy-based devices: a porcine model study. Int J Surg 2017;48:155-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.10.071
  23. Kim HY, Tufano RP, Randolph G, Barczynski M, Wu CW, Chiang FY, et al. Impact of positional changes in neural monitoring endotracheal tube on amplitude and latency of electromyographic response in monitored thyroid surgery: Results from the Porcine Experiment. Head Neck 2016;38 Suppl 1:E1004-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24145