Comparative Analysis of the Long-term Management Plan of Natural Parks - A Focus on Jeollabuk-do Provincial Parks -

  • Jeong, Nara (Urban Agriculture Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kang, Sanghui (Institute of Recreation and Landscape Planning, Chonbuk National Universty) ;
  • Ahn, Deugsoo (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Chonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.11.23
  • 심사 : 2018.12.10
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31

초록

The purpose of the present study was to compare the long-term management objectives, policy objectives, implementation plans, and detailed plans of four provincial parks established in 2013 using various analysis frameworks. Through this, the study aimed to identify the characteristics of the management plan and extract the implementation plan important to each park by analyzing the priorities in the detailed plan. The long-term management objectives of most parks were to maintain recreational functions by utilizing all the resources of the park, rather than merely preserving the ecosystem. From an ecological perspective, information on major plants and legal protection species are included for most parks, and geological and topographic features considered a major resource. For sustainable forests, it is important to induce the dispersion of concentrated use space. Efficient management systems are distinctively differentiated among the parks. For regional revitalization, the management of programs to link provincial parks and their surrounding areas has become most important. From an ecological perspective, priorities differed for the parks according to their ecological characteristics. For sustainable forests, Moaksan Provincial Park prioritized the visitor reservation system related to the overall park, while the other three parks prioritized alleviating the concentrated use of specific areas. From an efficient management perspective, Daedunsan Provincial Park prioritized aspects related to the cableway. Maisan Provincial Park prioritized inducing the linkage between the use of natural and cultural resources, and Seonunsan Provincial Park prioritized establishing an ecological and cultural commentary operating system. For the base-type leisure activity space, Moaksan Provincial Park prioritized the systematic management and operation of the pilgrimage route, Maisan Provincial Park the connection between the Maisan geography and residents' income, and Seonunsan Provincial Park providing a space for ecological education.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, D..Jeong, N.(2017). Assessment of Use Suitability for Resource Management in Natural Parks : Focusing on Jeollabuk-do Provincial Park. Journal of East Asian Landscape Studies. 11(2): 47-54.
  2. Bae, M..Lee, J.(2006). The Decision Model of Visit's Satisfaction in Natural Parks. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation. 10(4): 1-10.
  3. Bae, M..Shin, S.(2003). An Evaluation on Use Suitability of Recreation Resource in Natural Parks. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology. 17(3): 285-294.
  4. Baek, M..Shin, W..Yeoun, P..Lee, J..Lee, E.(2011). A Study on Visual Preference of Forest Landscapes in National Park Trail. Proceeding of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation Conference. pp. 109-109.
  5. Do, K.(2000). A study on the Environmentally Sound Management of National Park. Master's Thesis. Chungang University.
  6. Han, S..Cho, K.(2006). Estimating Non-market Valuation of National Park Using ITCM - Juwangsan National Park-. Korean Journal of Tourism Research. 21(1): 113-129.
  7. Han, S..Kwon, H.(2018). Developing a Long-term Forecasting Model for National Park Demand. Journal of Korean institute of forest recreation. 22(3): 57-63. https://doi.org/10.34272/forest.2018.22.3.006
  8. Heo, K.(2007). A Study on Management of Provincial Parks Lying in Two or More Administrative Sectors. Korea real estate review. 17(1): 183-199.
  9. Ju, H..Jeong, J.(2013). Analysis of Relative Importance and Priority of the Korea National Park Service's Core Function: Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Korean Journal of Local Government & Administration Studies. 27(2): 443-464. https://doi.org/10.18398/kjlgas.2013.27.2.443
  10. Kang, S..Jeong, N..Ahn, D.(2016). A Comparative Analysis of Landscape Elements and Landscape Management Plans in Nature Parks. Journal East Asian Landscape Studies. 10(4): 7-14.
  11. Kim, D..Cho, J..Baek, J.(2008). A Study on the Change of Management System According to Analysis of Administration Data1a - In the Case Study of Woraksan National Park-. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecolog. 22(1): 11-117.
  12. Kim, J.(2015). Facility Management Strategy of a Korea National Park Based on Importance-Performance Analysis. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology. 29(6): 952-958. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2015.29.6.952
  13. Kim, T.(2008). Comparison of Economic Value between Mountain and Marine National Park - Focused on Mt. Juwang and Dadohae Marine National Park-. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation. 12(4): 9-18.
  14. Lee, S.(2011). Determinants of Demand for a Natural Park - Estimating Participation and Consumption. Korean Journal of Tourism Research. 26(3): 339-360.
  15. Oh, H..Han, Y..Kang, H..Kim, D..You, J.(2013). The Characteristics of Actual Vegetation to Manage the Function of Forest Recreation in Bukhansan National Park. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation. 17(4): 169-182. https://doi.org/10.34272/forest.2013.17.4.017
  16. Shin, J.Park, J..Jung, M.(2016). Significance and Achievement of Natural Resources Survey of the Institute of Korea National Park Service - Focused on the Results of Geomorphological and Geological Field of 2015 Chiak National Park Survey -. The Geographical Journal of Korea. 50(4): 401-409.
  17. Sim, K.(2012). Estimating the Economic Value of Environmental Resources for Systematic National Park Management : A Case of Jirisan National Park. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation. 1(1): 121-126.
  18. Sim, K..Kwon, H..Song, D..Do, G..Kim, I.(2012). A Study on the Present Condition and Visitors' Perception of Eco-tourism in Korea National Parks. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation. 16(2): 85-91.
  19. http://www.knps.or.kr
  20. https://www.iucn.org