DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of an Excel Program for the Updated Eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer Breast Cancer Staging System

개정된 제8판 American Joint Committee on Cancer 유방암 병기 설정을 위한 Excel 프로그램 개발

  • Jo, Jaewon (Department of Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Eui Tae (Department of Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine) ;
  • Min, Jun Won (Department of Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chang, Myung-Chul (Department of Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine)
  • 조재원 (단국대학교 의과대학 외과학교실) ;
  • 김의태 (단국대학교 의과대학 외과학교실) ;
  • 민준원 (단국대학교 의과대학 외과학교실) ;
  • 장명철 (단국대학교 의과대학 외과학교실)
  • Received : 2017.11.20
  • Accepted : 2018.10.28
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: The eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer was recently published to more accurately predict the prognosis by adding biomarkers such as estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. However, this system is very complicated and difficult to use by clinicians. The authors developed a program to aid in setting up the staging system and confirmed its usefulness by applying it to theoretical combinations and actual clinical data. Methods: The program was developed using the Microsoft Excel Macro. It was used for the anatomic, clinical and pathological prognostic staging of 588 theoretical combinations. The stages were also calculated the stages using 840 patients with breast cancer without carcinoma in situ or distant metastasis who did not undergo preoperative chemotherapy. Results: The anatomic, clinical and pathological prognostic stages were identical in 240 out of 588 theoretical combinations. In the actual patients' data, stages IB and IIIB were more frequent in clinical and pathological prognostic stages than in the anatomic stage. The anatomic stage was similar to the clinical prognostic stage in 58.2% and to the pathological prognostic stage in 61.9% of patients. Oncotype DX changed the pathological prognostic stage in 2.1% of patients. Conclusion: We developed a program for the new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system that will be useful for clinical prognostic prediction and large survival data analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. Amin MB; American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017.
  2. Updated breast chapter for 8th edition. American Joint Committee on Cancer. https://cancerstaging.org/references-tools/deskreferences/Pages/Breast-Cancer-Staging.aspx. Accessed November 18th, 2017.
  3. Mittendorf EA. Updates to the 8th edition AJCC staging system for breast cancer. https://s3.amazonaws.com/dntstatic//2d7e807e- 7c87-49fe-4ebb-ebc96fb0ba2e. Accessed November 18th, 2017.
  4. Hyams DM, Schuur E, Angel Aristizabal J, Bargallo Rocha JE, Cabello C, Elizalde R, et al. Selecting postoperative adjuvant systemic therapy for early stage breast cancer: a critical assessment of commercially available gene expression assays. J Surg Oncol 2017; 115:647-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24561
  5. Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB, Mittendorf EA, Rugo HS, Solin LJ, et al. Breast Cancer-Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:290-303. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21393