A Study on the Interactive Architecture in Nature Environment

  • Received : 2018.10.29
  • Accepted : 2018.11.05
  • Published : 2018.12.25

Abstract

The context of innovation in which we evolve today, subtracts us in a spacial reality and virtuality (digital) that aimed less and less to interact with natural processes which could converge to new possible relationships in the world. We constantly live in presence of fluctuations and imperceptible natural energies (wind, solar radiation, etc.) defined by flows, their own physicality, which remains without being virtual, elusive. This study first outlines how these energies already exploited within the framework of production, could be thought as interactive of our habitat's space dimension, as a prolongation of a physical and material environment built by men and for men, giving rise to new social, cultural dynamics, and making natural complexity of our space vivid, comprehensible with new visual and physical clues. In recent days, where lifestyles are changing, architecture no longer needs to limit its scope of creation to only built structures. Based on a deeper understanding of human and through new potential advanced technologies (kinetic system, etc), it is time to fundamentally diagnose what environments or devices contribute to our lives. Architecture becomes ${\ll}interface{\gg}$, step up its fundamental role, and newly defines the sturdy image and tectonics of existing environment, establishing a stance to search for a new typology. In the end, building will show two simultaneous and distinctive connections related to its physical existence: reality in its function and irreductibility, in its ability to forge new dynamic connections with its environment, hybridizing the spatial dimension to a new form of physicality, adaptive and incessantly flexible in the dimension time, becoming a vessel for ever changing contemporary lifestyles.

Keywords

References

  1. Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham & London, Duke University Press, p.179.
  2. Ulrich Obrist, H. (2001). Battery, Kraftwerk, and Laborato-ry(Alexander Dorner Revisited). In (ed.) Carin Kuoni, Words of Wisdom, New York, p.128.
  3. Kim, Y.S., Seo, J.H., Ryu, R. (2015). A Study on the interaction Envelop Design through Ned Kahn's Works. International Journal of Smart Home, 9(10), pp.37-46.
  4. Kahn, N. (2016). <> in Interactive Architecture: Adaptive World. Princeton Architectural Press, pp.28-35.
  5. http://nedkahn.com/, Ned Kahn : Ned Kahn Studio.
  6. Madeleine, G. (2002). Olafur Eliasson. Phaidon Press, London & New York, p.160.
  7. Olafur, E. (2006). <>, in Your Engagement has Consequences on the Relativity of Your Reality. Baden, Lars Muller, 62-64.
  8. Olafur, E., Philip U. (2012). Studio Olafur Eliasson: An Encyclopedia. Taschen, p.532.
  9. Philippe, R. (2005). Decorsterd and Rahm-Distortions: Architecture 2000-2005. Editions HYX, Orleans, France, p.124.
  10. Philippe, R. (2006). Interior weather, "Environment: Approaches for Tomorrow". curated by Giovanna Borasi and Mirko Zardini, Montreal, Canada, p.160.
  11. Philippe, R. (2009). Architecture meteorologique. Archibooks, Paris, France, p.123.
  12. Jan, K., Florian, S., Matthias, O., Hauke, J. (2012). Bio-inspired Kinetic GFRP-façade for the Thematic Pavilion of the EXPO 2012. IASS Annual Symposium, 2012-5, pp.790-798.