DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mercury Ions Mediated Phosphorus Containing Carbon Dots as Fluorescent Probe for Biothiols Screening

  • Du, Han (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering Shanghai Institute of Technology) ;
  • Xu, Hu (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering Shanghai Institute of Technology) ;
  • Zhao, Yun (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering Shanghai Institute of Technology) ;
  • Li, Dan (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering Shanghai Institute of Technology) ;
  • Wang, Yuhong (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering Shanghai Institute of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2018.04.17
  • 심사 : 2018.09.06
  • 발행 : 2018.10.31

초록

In this study, we report the mercury ions ($Hg^{2+}$) mediated phosphorus-containing carbon dots (PCDs) as a selective "off-on" fluorescence probe for glutathione (GSH), cysteine (Cys) and homocysteine (Hcys). PCDs obtained by hydrothermal reaction are sensitive to $Hg^{2+}$ ions and its fluorescence can be significantly quenched owing to the electron transfer from the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of PCDs to $Hg^{2+}$. Interestingly, the weak fluorescence of $Hg^{2+}$-mediated PCDs could be gradually recovered with the addition of GSH, Cys and Hcys. This can be attributed to the formation of $Hg^{2+}-S$ complex due to the super affinity of $Hg^{2+}$-sulfydryl bond. The formation of $Hg^{2+}-S$ complex extremely reduces the oxidation ability of $Hg^{2+}$ that inhibits the electron transfer from LUMO of PCDs to $Hg^{2+}$ and re-opens the native electron transition from LUMO to the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of PCDs. Thus, the green fluorescence of PCDs is switched on. Furthermore, the present $Hg^{2+}$-mediated PCDs assay exhibits a high selectivity for GSH, Cys and Hcy and has been successfully used to detect the total biothiols content in human urine samples.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. J. X. Dong, X. F. Song, Y. Shi, Z. F. Gao, B. L. Li and N. B. Li, Biosens. Bioelectron. 281, 473 (2016).
  2. N. Zhang, F. Qu, H. Q. Luo and N. B. Li, Biosens. Bioelectron. 42, 214 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2012.10.090
  3. B. Y. Han, J. P. Yuan and E. K. Wang, Anal. Chem. 81, 5569 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac900769h
  4. K. S. Park, M. I. Kim, M. A. Woo and H. G. Park, Biosens. Bioelectron. 45, 65 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2013.01.047
  5. Z. J. Li, X. J. Zheng, L. Zhang, R. P. Liang and Z. M. Li, Biosens. Bioelectron. 68, 668 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2015.01.062
  6. X. Zhai, P. Zhang, C. Liu, T. Bai, W. Li, L. Dai, L. W. Chen and L. W. Guang, Chem. Commun. 48, 7955 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc33869f
  7. F. Yan, Q. Ye, J. Xu, J. He, L. Chen and X. Zhou, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 251, 753 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.05.050
  8. A. Gupta, N. C. Verma, S. Khan and C. K. Nandi, Biosens. Bioelectron. 81, 465 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.03.018
  9. V. Borse, M. Thakur, S. Sengupta and R. Srivastava, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 248, 481 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.03.158
  10. J. Gu, D. Hu, W. Wang, Q. Zhang, Z. Meng and X. Jia, Biosens. Bioelectron. 68, 27 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.12.027