Acknowledgement
Supported by : Castell Foundation
References
- Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ; American Gastroenterological Association. AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 2005;128:209-224. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.008
- van Hoeij FB, Bredenoord AJ. Clinical application of esophageal highresolution manometry in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016;22:6-13.
- Herregods TV, Roman S, Kahrilas PJ, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Normative values in esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015;27:175-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12500
- Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012;24(suppl 1):57-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01834.x
- Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015;27:160-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12477
- Pandolfino JE, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ, Kahrilas PJ. High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2009;21:796-806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01311.x
- Schlottmann F, Herbella FA, Patti MG. Understanding the Chicago classification: from tracings to patients. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017;23:487-494. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm17026
- Tutuian R, Vela MF, Balaji NS, et al. Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;1:174-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1542-3565(03)70033-0
- Clayton SB, Rife C, Kalbfleisch JH, Castell DO. Viscous impedance is an important indicator of abnormal esophageal motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013;25:563-e455. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12117
- Bernhard A, Pohl D, Fried M, Castell DO, Tutuian R. Influence of bolus consistency and position on esophageal high-resolution manometry findings. Dig Dis Sci 2008;53:1198-1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-007-0014-z
- Sears VW Jr, Castell JA, Castell DO. Comparison of effects of upright versus supine body position and liquid versus solid bolus on esophageal pressures in normal humans. Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:857-864. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536799
- Xiao Y, Nicodeme F, Kahrilas PJ, Roman S, Lin Z, Pandolfino JE. Optimizing the swallow protocol of clinical high-resolution esophageal manometry studies. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012;24:e489-e496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01989.x
- Ang D, Misselwitz B, Hollenstein M, et al. Diagnostic yield of highresolution manometry with a solid test meal for clinically relevant, symptomatic oesophageal motility disorders: serial diagnostic study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;2:654-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30148-6
- Allen ML, Mellow MH, Robinson M. Manometry during food ingestion aids in the diagnosis of diffuse esophageal spasm. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:568-571.
- Zhang X, Xiang X, Tu L, Xie X, Hou X. Esophageal motility in the supine and upright positions for liquid and solid swallows through highresolution manometry. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013;19:467-472. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm.2013.19.4.467
- Xiao Y, Read A, Nicodeme F, Roman S, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE. The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012;24:e509-e516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.02001.x
- Zheng E, Gideon RM, Sloan J, Katz PO. Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction is often associated with coexistent abnormal esophageal body motility and abnormal bolus transit. Dis Esophagus 2017;30:1-4.
- Wang YT, Sifrim D. Use of solid boluses in high-resolution manometry. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013;19:422-423. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm.2013.19.4.422
- Nguyen HN, Domingues GR, Winograd R, et al. Impedance characteristics of normal oesophageal motor function. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;15:773-780. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.meg.0000059161.46867.2b
- Tutuian R, Castell DO. Clinical applications of esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance testing. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY) 2006;2:250-258.
- Kessing BF, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Clinical applications of esophageal impedance monitoring and high-resolution manometry. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2012;14:197-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-012-0253-9
- Bulsiewicz WJ, Kahrilas PJ, Kwiatek MA, Ghosh SK, Meek A, Pandolfino JE. Esophageal pressure topography criteria indicative of incomplete bolus clearance: a study using high-resolution impedance manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:2721-2728. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.467
- Park EJ, Lee JS, Lee TH, et al. High-resolution impedance manometry criteria in the sitting position indicative of incomplete bolus clearance. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014;20:491-496. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm14012
Cited by
- Role of the Rapid Drink Challenge Test in Esophageal Motility Disorder Diagnosis vol.26, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm20035
- Updates on diagnostic modalities for esophageal dysphagia vol.1481, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14453
- Diagnosis of Dysphagia: High Resolution Manometry & EndoFLIP vol.77, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2021.018
- European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) recommendations for the use of high‐resolution manometry of the esophagus vol.33, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14043
- Dysphagia lusoria: utility of high‐resolution impedance manometry to identify true disease vol.33, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14176