DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity: Efficacy, Safety, and Anatomical Outcomes

  • Kang, Hyun Goo (Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Eun Young (Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Byeon, Suk Ho (Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sung Soo (Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Koh, Hyoung Jun (Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sung Chul (Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Min (Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2018.01.22
  • Accepted : 2018.03.19
  • Published : 2018.12.05

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy, safety, and anatomical outcomes associated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of intravitreal anti-VEGF (bevacizumab or ranibizumab) treatment of 153 eyes (83 infants) diagnosed with ROP at two tertiary hospitals from June 2011 to January 2017. The primary outcome was the rate of recurrence requiring additional treatment; secondary outcomes included incidence of major complications and final refractive error. Results: A total of 101 eyes were treated with bevacizumab, and 52 with ranibizumab. The bevacizumab and ranibizumab groups were characterized by mean birthweights of $941.8{\pm}296.1$ and $1,257.7{\pm}514.5g$, gestational ages at birth of $26.9{\pm}1.9$ and $28.1{\pm}3.2$ weeks, and postmenstrual ages at treatment of $40.4{\pm}2.4$ and $39.2{\pm}2.3$ weeks, respectively. The two groups differed significantly in birthweights and gestational ages at birth, but not in postmenstrual ages at treatment. The mean follow-up duration was $30.9{\pm}18.4$ months for the bevacizumab group, and $13.9{\pm}12.5$ months for ranibizumab. More cases were classified as zone 1 ROP in the ranibizumab group (44.2% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.001). Major surgical interventions included scleral encircling and vitrectomy (one and two eyes, respectively, both in the bevacizumab group). Retinal detachment was noted in one eye treated with bevacizumab. There was no significant difference in the most recent spherical equivalence for the two groups ($+0.10{\pm}3.66$ and $+0.22{\pm}3.00$ diopters for bevacizumab and ranibizumab, respectively). Univariable analysis revealed that only ROP stage influenced the occurrence of major complications (odds ratio, 9.046; p = 0.012). Conclusions: Intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment of ROP with both bevacizumab and ranibizumab achieved stable retinal vascularization with a low rate of complications and recurrence. Ranibizumab achieved similar anatomical outcomes as bevacizumab, without additional risk for major complications.

Keywords

References

  1. Blencowe H, Lawn JE, Vazquez T, et al. Preterm-associated visual impairment and estimates of retinopathy of prematurity at regional and global levels for 2010. Pediatr Res 2013;74 Suppl 1:35-49. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2013.205
  2. Kushner BJ, Essner D, Cohen IJ, Flynn JT. Retrolental Fibroplasia. II. Pathologic correlation. Arch Ophthalmol 1977;95:29-38. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1977.04450010031002
  3. Tsui I, Chu A. Hot topics in retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatr Ann 2017;46:e415-22. https://doi.org/10.3928/19382359-20171023-02
  4. Casteels I, Cassiman C, Van Calster J, Allegaert K. Educational paper: retinopathy of prematurity. Eur J Pediatr 2012;171:887-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-011-1610-7
  5. Malcolm W. Beyond the NICU: comprehensive care of the high-risk infant. New York: McGraw Hill Professional; 2014. p. 347-65.
  6. Darlow BA. Retinopathy of prematurity: new developments bring concern and hope. J Paediatr Child Health 2015;51:765-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12860
  7. Goggin M, O'Keefe M. Childhood blindness in the Republic of Ireland: a national survey. Br J Ophthalmol 1991;75:425-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.75.7.425
  8. Hoogerwerf A, Schalij-Delfos NE, van Schooneveld MJ, Termote JU. Incidence of retinopathy of prematurity over the last decade in the Central Netherlands. Neonatology 2010;98:137-42. https://doi.org/10.1159/000280386
  9. Isaza G, Arora S, Bal M, Chaudhary V. Incidence of retinopathy of prematurity and risk factors among premature infants at a neonatal intensive care unit in Canada. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2013;50:27-32. https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20121127-02
  10. Hwang JH, Lee EH, Kim EA. Retinopathy of prematurity among very-low-birth-weight infants in Korea: incidence, treatment, and risk factors. J Korean Med Sci 2015;30 Suppl 1:S88-94. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2015.30.S1.S88
  11. Mintz-Hittner HA, Kennedy KA, Chuang AZ; BEAT-ROP Cooperative Group. Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for stage 3+ retinopathy of prematurity. N Engl J Med 2011;364:603-15. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1007374
  12. Geloneck MM, Chuang AZ, Clark WL, et al. Refractive outcomes following bevacizumab monotherapy compared with conventional laser treatment: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014;132:1327-33. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.2772
  13. Kong L, Bhatt AR, Demny AB, et al. Pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab and its effects on serum VEGF and IGF-1 in infants with retinopathy of prematurity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015;56:956-61. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-15842
  14. Wu WC, Lien R, Liao PJ, et al. Serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and related factors after intravitreous bevacizumab injection for retinopathy of prematurity. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015;133:391-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.5373
  15. Morin J, Luu TM, Superstein R, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes following bevacizumab injections for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics 2016 Mar 17. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3218.
  16. Jang SY, Choi KS, Lee SJ. Delayed-onset retinal detachment after an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab for zone 1 plus retinopathy of prematurity. J AAPOS 2010;14:457-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.05.011
  17. Yonekawa Y, Wu WC, Nitulescu CE, et al. Progressive retinal detachment in infants with retinopathy of prematurity treated with intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab. Retina 2018;38:1079-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001685
  18. Lee BJ, Kim JH, Heo H, Yu YS. Delayed onset atypical vitreoretinal traction band formation after an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in stage 3 retinopathy of prematurity. Eye (Lond) 2012;26:903-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2012.111
  19. Wang J, Xiang D. Early clinical characteristics of bacterial endophthalmitis in retinopathy of prematurity after intravitreal bevacizumab injection: a case report. Exp Ther Med 2017;13:3563-6. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.4406
  20. Wu WC, Kuo HK, Yeh PT, et al. An updated study of the use of bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity in Taiwan. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;155:150-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.06.010
  21. Chen SN, Lian I, Hwang YC, et al. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: comparison between ranibizumab and bevacizumab. Retina 2015;35:667-74. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000380
  22. Huang Q, Zhang Q, Fei P, et al. Ranibizumab injection as primary treatment in patients with retinopathy of prematurity: anatomic outcomes and influencing Factors. Ophthalmology 2017;124:1156-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.018
  23. Csaky K, Do DV. Safety implications of vascular endothelial growth factor blockade for subjects receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148:647-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.06.014
  24. Semeraro F, Morescalchi F, Duse S, et al. Aflibercept in wet AMD: specific role and optimal use. Drug Des Devel Ther 2013;7:711-22.
  25. Ferrara N, Damico L, Shams N, et al. Development of ranibizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antigen binding fragment, as therapy for neovascular agerelated macular degeneration. Retina 2006;26:859-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.iae.0000242842.14624.e7
  26. International Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity revisited. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:991-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.123.7.991
  27. Good WV; Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Final results of the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ETROP) randomized trial. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2004;102:233-48.
  28. Chen Y, Fen J, Meng X. Effects of ranibizumab in zone I and zone II retinopathy of prematurity patients. Chinese J Ophthalmol 2015;31:6-9.
  29. Darlow BA, Ells AL, Gilbert CE, et al. Are we there yet? Bevacizumab therapy for retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2013;98:F170-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2011-301148
  30. Chen J, Smith LE. Retinopathy of prematurity. Angiogenesis 2007;10:133-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-007-9066-0
  31. Hartnett ME, Penn JS. Mechanisms and management of retinopathy of prematurity. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2515-26. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1208129
  32. Micieli JA, Surkont M, Smith AF. A systematic analysis of the off-label use of bevacizumab for severe retinopathy of prematurity. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148:536-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.05.031
  33. Klaassen I, van Geest RJ, Kuiper EJ, et al. The role of CTGF in diabetic retinopathy. Exp Eye Res 2015;133:37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2014.10.016
  34. Hartnett ME. Vascular endothelial growth factor antagonist therapy for retinopathy of prematurity. Clin Perinatol 2014;41:925-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2014.08.011
  35. Geisen P, Peterson LJ, Martiniuk D, et al. Neutralizing antibody to VEGF reduces intravitreous neovascularization and may not interfere with ongoing intraretinal vascularization in a rat model of retinopathy of prematurity. Mol Vis 2008;14:345-57.
  36. Hong YR, Kim YH, Kim SY, et al. Plasma concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor in retinopathy of prematurity after intravitreal bevacizumab injection. Retina 2015;35:1772-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000535
  37. Avery RL, Castellarin AA, Steinle NC, et al. Systemic pharmacokinetics following intravitreal injections of ranibizumab, bevacizumab or aflibercept in patients with neovascular AMD. Br J Ophthalmol 2014;98:1636-41. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305252
  38. Hoerster R, Muether P, Dahlke C, et al. Serum concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor in an infant treated with ranibizumab for retinopathy of prematurity. Acta Ophthalmol 2013;91:e74-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02469.x
  39. Castellanos MA, Schwar tz S, Garcia-Aguir re G, Quiroz-Mercado H. Short-term outcome after intravitreal ranibizumab injections for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity. Br J Ophthalmol 2013;97:816-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302276
  40. Isaac M, Mireskandari K, Tehrani N. Does bevacizumab alter vascularization potential in retinopathy of prematurity? Ophthalmology 2016;123:2042-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.04.024
  41. Hwang CK, Hubbard GB, Hutchinson AK, Lambert SR. Outcomes after intravitreal bevacizumab versus laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: a 5-year retrospective analysis. Ophthalmology 2015;122:1008-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.12.017

Cited by

  1. Update on Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Safety for Retinopathy of Prematurity vol.9, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/apo.0000000000000302
  2. Ursodeoxycholic Acid Halts Pathological Neovascularization in a Mouse Model of Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy vol.9, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061921
  3. Gene Therapy Intervention in Neovascular Eye Disease: A Recent Update vol.28, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.06.029
  4. Pathogenetically oriented approach to prevention of retinopathy of prematurity (experimental study) vol.137, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202113703126
  5. Refractive outcomes after intravitreal injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor versus laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: a meta-analysis vol.11, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042384