방사선산업학회지 (Journal of Radiation Industry)

한국방사선산업학회 (Korean Society of Radiation Industry)
권호 표지

유방촬영의 영상획득 방법에 따른 해상력 차트의 비교 분석

Comparative Analysis According to Acquisition Type by Using the Resolution Phantom for Mammography Equipment

  • 김재훈 (목포한국병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 지연상 (광주보건대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 동경래 (광주보건대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 곽종길 (동신대학교 보건의료학과)
  • Kim, Jae-Hoon (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mokpo Hankook Hospital) ;
  • Ji, Yun-Sang (Department of Radiological Technology, Gwangju Health University) ;
  • Dong, Kyung-Rae (Department of Radiological Technology, Gwangju Health University) ;
  • Kwak, Jong-Gil (Dpartment of Public Health and Medicine, Dongshin University Graduate School)
  • 투고 : 2018.08.24
  • 심사 : 2018.10.21
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31

⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Nowadays, diseases related with breast are increasing rapidly and because of this high quality of resolution images is required to get clear detail specially for early detection and diagnosis. It has a tendency to use digital equipments than analog one in clinic. In this experiment, DR, CR, and Film are used for the resolution applied by AEC. Resolution phantom in DR was $7LP{\cdot}mm^{-1}$ in both verticality and horizontality. In CR, however, it was $6LP{\cdot}mm^{-1}$ in both which was lower this standard. The resolution stayed in range of standard in Film but it showed differences between $11{\sim}14LP{\cdot}mm^{-1}$ Overall, the difference of resolution was displayed Film, DR and CR, in order, which means the study is needed for more high quality of digital images.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Gwangju Health University

참고문헌

  1. Haus AG. 1982. Physical principles and radiation dose in mammography. Med. Radiogr. Photogr. 58(3):70-80.
  2. Kim MY and Kim HS. 2012. The Evaluation of Radiation Dose by Exposure Method in Digital Magnification Mammography. J. Radiol. Sci. Technol. 35(4):293-297.
  3. Kim SJ and Ji TJ. 2006. Actual condition on accuracy control of mammography equipment in Kyeongsangbuk-do. J. Radiol. Sci. Technol. 29(1):29-37.
  4. Kim SY, Kim MH and Oh KK. 2000. Analysis and Comparison of Breast Density according to Age on Mammogram between Korean and Western Women. Korean J. Radiol. 42:1009-1014. https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.2000.42.6.1009
  5. Kwoen DC, Lee EM and Park P. 2003. Measurement of the Compression Force and Thickness applied during Mammography. J. Radiol. Sci. Technol. 26(2):229-235.
  6. Lee IJ, Kim HS, Kim SS and Huh J. 2002. A Study on the Image Quality of Mammography and the Average Glandular Dose. J. Radiol. Sci. Technol. 25(2):47-55.
  7. Lee IJ, Kim JM and Huh J. 1998. Measurement of X-ray Quality in Mammography Unit. J. Radiol. Sci. Technol. 21(2):5-10.
  8. Shin GS, Kim JM, Kim YH, Choi JH and Kim CK. 2007. Comparison of Avergae Glandular Dose in Screen-Film and Digital Mammography Using Breast Tissue-Equivalent Phantom. J. Radiol. Sci. Technol. 30(1):13-23.
  9. Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B, Chen HH, Smith RA and Duffy SW. 2003. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 361(9367):1405-1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13143-1
  10. Yang HJ, Ko SK and Joo MH. 2007. Evaluation of MTF Image by Target/Filter Combined of X-ray Tube Using Mammography. J. Radiol. Sci. Technol. 30(2):113-119.