DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prostatectomy Provides Better Symptom-Free Survival Than Radiotherapy Among Patients With High-Risk or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer After Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy

  • Kim, Sung Han (Department of Urology, Center for Prostate Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Song, Mi Kyung (Biometrics Research Branch and Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, National Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Park, Weon Seo (Department of Pathology, Center for Prostate Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Joung, Jae Young (Department of Urology, Center for Prostate Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Seo, Ho Kyung (Department of Urology, Center for Prostate Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Chung, Jinsoo (Department of Urology, Center for Prostate Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Kang Hyun (Department of Urology, Center for Prostate Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital)
  • Received : 2018.11.01
  • Accepted : 2018.12.07
  • Published : 2018.12.30

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the radiation therapy (RT) and radical prostatectomy (RP) of high-risk or locally advanced prostate cancer (PC) patients after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients underwent RT (42 patients) or RP (152 patients) after NHT at a single center during 2003-2014. Times to biochemical recurrence (BCR), pelvic local recurrence (PLR), metastasis, clinical painful symptom progression (CPSP), castration-resistant PC (CRPC), and overall survival were compared between the RT and RP groups, after adjustment for TN stage, using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: Significant inter-group differences were observed for age, Gleason score, initial PSA, and clinical and pathological T stages (all p<0.05). During a median follow-up of 71.7 months, the overall incidences of BCR, PLR, metastasis, CPSP, CRPC, and death were 49.5%, 16.5%, 8.3%, 7.7%, 7.7%, and 17.5%, respectively. The median times to BCR were 100 months for RT and 36.2 months for RP (p=0.004), although the median times were not reached for the other outcomes (all p>0.05). The independent predictor of CPSP was RP (hazard ratio, 0.291; p=0.013). Conclusions: Despite significantly different baseline parameters, RP provided better CPSP-free survival than RT among patients with localized high-risk or locally advanced PC.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Korean National Cancer Center

References

  1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010;127:2893-917. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25516
  2. Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, van der Kwast T, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2014;65:467-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.002
  3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Guidelines for Patients: Prostate Cancer. ver 3. Fort Wathington (PA): National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2016.
  4. Carroll PR, Parsons JK, Andriole G, Bahnson RR, Castle EP, Catalona WJ, et al. NCCN Guidelines insights: prostate cancer early detection, version 2.2016. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2016;14:509-19. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2016.0060
  5. Pompe RS, Karakiewicz PI, Tian Z, Mandel P, Steuber T, Schlomm T, et al. Oncologic and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy for high or very high risk prostate cancer: European Validation of the Current NCCN(R) Guideline. J Urol 2017;198:354-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.070
  6. Shelley MD, Kumar S, Wilt T, Staffurth J, Coles B, Mason MD. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials of neo-adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 2009;35:9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.08.002
  7. Schulman CC, Debruyne FM, Forster G, Selvaggi FP, Zlotta AR, Witjes WP. 4-Year follow-up results of a European prospective randomized study on neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy in T2-3N0M0 prostate cancer. European Study Group on Neoadjuvant Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2000;38:706-13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000020366
  8. Zilli T, Dal Pra A, Kountouri M, Miralbell R. Prognostic value of biochemical response to neoadjuvant androgen deprivation before external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev 2016;46:35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.03.016
  9. Hoffman RM, Koyama T, Fan KH, Albertsen PC, Barry MJ, Goodman M, et al. Mortality after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013;105:711-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt059
  10. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL; ISUP Grading Committee. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:1228-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1
  11. Kim YJ, Cho KH, Pyo HR, Lee KH, Moon SH, Kim TH, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Comparison of treatment outcomes. Strahlenther Onkol 2015;191:321-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-014-0765-3
  12. Cheung R. In regards to Roach et al. defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;65:965-974). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;66:1274.
  13. Gillessen S, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bossi A, Bristow R, et al. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: the report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference APCCC 2017. Eur Urol 2018;73:178-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.002
  14. Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends--an update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25:16-27. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0578
  15. van den Ouden D, Schroder FH. The treatment of locally advanced (T3) prostatic carcinoma using radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. A review. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 1998;29:74-9.
  16. Grimm P, Billiet I, Bostwick D, Dicker AP, Frank S, Immerzeel J, et al. Comparative analysis of prostate-specific antigen free survival outcomes for patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treatment by radical therapy. Results from the Prostate Cancer Results Study Group. BJU Int 2012;109 Suppl 1:22-9.
  17. Pollack A, Zagars GK, Smith LG, Lee JJ, von Eschenbach AC, Antolak JA, et al. Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:3904-11. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.23.3904
  18. Bolla M, Gonzalez D, Warde P, Dubois JB, Mirimanoff RO, Storme G, et al. Improved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin. N Engl J Med 1997;337:295-300. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199707313370502
  19. Gomella LG, Zeltser I, Valicenti RK. Use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy to prevent or delay recurrence of prostate cancer in patients undergoing surgical treatment for prostate cancer. Urology 2003;62 Suppl 1:46-54.
  20. Cooperberg MR, Vickers AJ, Broering JM, Carroll PR. Comparative risk-adjusted mortality outcomes after primary surgery, radiotherapy, or androgen-deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Cancer 2010;116:5226-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25456
  21. Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL, Canby-Hagino ED, D'Amico AV, Dmochowski RR, et al. Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol 2007;177:540-5.
  22. Prabhakar R, Oates R, Daryl J, Chang J, Geso M, Cramb J. Rectal complication probability from composite volumes derived from daily cone beam computed tomography in prostate cancer radiotherapy. J Cancer Res Ther 2016;12:374-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.174529
  23. Wortel RC, Witte MG, van der Heide UA, Pos FJ, Lebesque JV, van Herk M, et al. Dose-surface maps identifying local dose-effects for acute gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2015;117:515-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.10.020
  24. Cicchetti A, Rancati T, Ebert M, Fiorino C, Palorini F, Kennedy A, et al. Modelling late stool frequency and rectal pain after radical radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients: Results from a large pooled population. Phys Med 2016;32:1690-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.09.018
  25. Bono AV, Pagano F, Montironi R, Zattoni F, Manganelli A, Selvaggi FP, et al. Effect of complete androgen blockade on pathologic stage and resection margin status of prostate cancer: progress pathology report of the Italian PROSIT study. Urology 2001;57:117-21.
  26. Soloway MS, Pareek K, Sharifi R, Wajsman Z, McLeod D, Wood DP Jr, et al. Neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy in cT2bNxMo prostate cancer: 5-year results. J Urol 2002;167:112-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65393-1
  27. Fahmy O, Khairul-Asri MG, Hadi SHSM, Gakis G, Stenzl A. The role of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int 2017;99:249-56. https://doi.org/10.1159/000478789
  28. Kumar S, Shelley M, Harrison C, Coles B, Wilt TJ, Mason MD. Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(4):CD006019.
  29. Ward JF, Slezak JM, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Zincke H. Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome. BJU Int 2005;95:751-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05394.x