DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Does epithelioid angiomyolipoma have poorer prognosis, compared with classic angiomyolipoma?

  • Lee, Wonchul (Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Se Young (Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Chanwoo (Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Yoo, Sangjun (Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • You, Dalsan (Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Jeong, In Gab (Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Song, Cheryn (Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Kun Suk (Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Bumsik (Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Jun Hyuk (Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Ahn, Hanjong (Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Choung-Soo (Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2018.07.09
  • Accepted : 2018.08.27
  • Published : 2018.11.10

Abstract

Purpose: Classic angiomyolipoma (AML) is common benign kidney tumor. However, some studies have claimed that epithelioid angiomyolipoma (EAML) has malignant potential. We compared the patient characteristics and prognosis of EAML and classic AML to demonstrate predicting factors and poorer prognosis of EAML. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 231 patients who were diagnosed with EAML (n=27, 11.7%) or classic AML (n=204, 88.3%), were reviewed. All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scans before operation or needle biopsy. We assessed the age, sex, tumor size, body mass index, comorbidities, and Hounsfield unit (HU) according to each CT phase. We defined the unfavorable group as patients with recurrence, metastasis and death due to tumor progression. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict EAML. Results: EAML patients were younger (41.2 years vs. 49.1 years, p=0.001), predominantly male (55.6% vs. 28.4%, p=0.005), and had a larger tumor (7.5 cm vs. 4.2 cm, p<0.001). The median pre-contrast HU was not significantly different between EAML and classic AML ($29.9{\pm}23.7$ vs. $14.7{\pm}41.0$, p=0.071). In multivariable analysis, younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; p=0.032), male sex (OR, 3.33; p=0.013), and tumor larger than 4 cm (OR, 3.8; p=0.009) were significant predictive factors. Five patients (18.5%) had unfavorable outcomes, two patients had lymph node metastasis, and three patients had lung metastasis. Conclusions: Patient and tumor characteristics can be helpful in determining the type of AML preoperatively. Younger age, male sex, and larger tumor mass may increase the possibility of diagnosing EAML. EAML has malignant potential and requires careful follow-up.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Ministry of Health & Welfare

References

  1. Neumann HP, Schwarzkopf G, Henske EP. Renal angiomyolipomas, cysts, and cancer in tuberous sclerosis complex. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1998;5:269-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-9091(98)80005-3
  2. Aydin H, Magi-Galluzzi C, Lane BR, Sercia L, Lopez JI, Rini BI, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma: clinicopathologic study of 194 cases with emphasis on the epithelioid histology and tuberous sclerosis association. Am J Surg Pathol 2009;33:289-97. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e31817ed7a6
  3. Armah HB, Parwani AV. Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009;133:648-54.
  4. He W, Cheville JC, Sadow PM, Gopalan A, Fine SW, Al-Ahmadie HA, et al. Epithelioid angiomyolipoma of the kidney: pathological features and clinical outcome in a series of consecutively resected tumors. Mod Pathol 2013;26:1355-64. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2013.72
  5. Brimo F, Robinson B, Guo C, Zhou M, Latour M, Epstein JI. Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma with atypia: a series of 40 cases with emphasis on clinicopathologic prognostic indicators of malignancy. Am J Surg Pathol 2010;34:715-22.
  6. Varma S, Gupta S, Talwar J, Forte F, Dhar M. Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma: a malignant disease. J Nephrol 2011;24:18-22.
  7. Martignoni G, Pea M, Bonetti F, Brnelli M, Eble JN. Oncocytoma-like angiomyolipoma. A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 2 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002;126:610-2.
  8. Mai KT, Perkins DG, Collins JP. Epithelioid cell variant of renal angiomyolipoma. Histopathology 1996;28:277-80. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2559.1996.d01-421.x
  9. Lei JH, Liu LR, Wei Q, Song TR, Yang L, Yuan HC, et al. A four-year follow-up study of renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma: a multi-center experience and literature review. Sci Rep 2015;5:10030. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10030
  10. Lopez-Beltran A, Scarpelli M, Montironi R, Kirkali Z. 2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults. Eur Urol 2006;49:798-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.035
  11. Faraji H, Nguyen BN, Mai KT. Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma: a study of six cases and a meta-analytic study. Development of criteria for screening the entity with prognostic significance. Histopathology 2009;55:525-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03420.x
  12. Lavrut PM, Paparel P, Decaussin-Petrucci M. Epithelioid angiomyolipoma of the kidney: about one case and malignant features evaluation. Ann Pathol 2017;37:182-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annpat.2017.01.005
  13. Nese N, Martignoni G, Fletcher CD, Gupta R, Pan CC, Kim H, et al. Pure epithelioid PEComas (so-called epithelioid angiomyolipoma) of the kidney: a clinicopathologic study of 41 cases: detailed assessment of morphology and risk stratification. Am J Surg Pathol 2011;35:161-76. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e318206f2a9
  14. Huang KH, Huang CY, Chung SD, Pu YS, Shun CT, Chen J. Malignant epithelioid angiomyolipoma of the kidney. J Formos Med Assoc 2007;106(2 Suppl):S51-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60353-3
  15. Yamamoto T, Ito K, Suzuki K, Yamanaka H, Ebihara K, Sasaki A. Rapidly progressive malignant epithelioid angiomyolipoma of the kidney. J Urol 2002;168:190-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64862-8
  16. Adanur S, Keskin E, Ziypak T, Koc E, Demirci E, Yapanoglu T, et al. Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma mimicking urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2014;86:235-6. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2014.3.235
  17. Folpe AL, Kwiatkowski DJ. Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms: pathology and pathogenesis. Hum Pathol 2010;41:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2009.05.011
  18. Liu Y, Qu F, Cheng R, Ye Z. CT-imaging features of renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma. World J Surg Oncol 2015;13:280. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0700-9
  19. Zhu J, Li H, Ding, L, Cheng H. Imaging appearance of renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma: a case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e9563. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009563
  20. Cibas ES, Goss GA, Kulke MH, Demetri GD, Fletcher CD. Malignant epithelioid angiomyolipoma ('sarcoma ex angiomyolipoma') of the kidney: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25:121-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200101000-00014
  21. Park HK, Zhang S, Wong MK, Kim HL. Clinical presentation of epithelioid angiomyolipoma. Int J Urol 2007;14:21-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01665.x
  22. Benson C, Vitfell-Rasmussen J, Maruzzo M, Fisher C, Tunariu N, Mitchell S, et al. A retrospective study of patients with malignant PEComa receiving treatment with sirolimus or temsirolimus: the royal marsden hospital experience. Anticancer Res 2014;34:3663-8.

Cited by

  1. A Primary Adrenal Epithelioid Angiomyolipoma (PEComa) in a Patient with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Report of a Case and Review of the Literature vol.2020, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5131736
  2. Varying Outcomes among Patients with Large Angiomyolipomas according to the Treatment Method vol.105, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1159/000515990
  3. Exceptional features of metastatic lung epithelioid angiomyiolipoma on FNA cytology: When cytology questions histology vol.49, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.24554
  4. PEComa in the rectum: A case report and review of the literature on epithelioid angiomyolipoma vol.86, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106301