DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Contribution of Lateral Interbody Fusion in Staged Correction of Adult Degenerative Scoliosis

  • Choi, Seung Won (Department of Neurosurgery, Chungnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Ames, Christopher (Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco) ;
  • Berven, Sigurd (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco) ;
  • Chou, Dean (Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco) ;
  • Tay, Bobby (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco) ;
  • Deviren, Vedat (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco)
  • Received : 2017.10.23
  • Accepted : 2017.12.17
  • Published : 2018.11.01

Abstract

Objective : Lateral interbody fusion (LIF) is attractive as a less invasive technique to address anterior spinal pathology in the treatment of adult spinal deformity. Its own uses and benefits in treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis are undefined. To investigate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of LIF, and staged LIF and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis patients, we analyzed radiographic and clinical outcomes of adult degenerative scoliosis patients who underwent LIF and posterior spinal fusion. Methods : Forty consecutive adult degenerative scoliosis patients who underwent LIF followed by staged PSF at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Long-standing 36" anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were taken preoperatively, at inter-stage, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery were reviewed. Outcomes were assessed through the visual analogue scale (VAS), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results : Forty patients with a mean age of 66.3 (range, 49-79) met inclusion criteria. A mean of 3.8 levels (range, 2-5) were fused using LIF, while a mean of 9.0 levels (range, 3-16) were fused during the posterior approach. The mean time between stages was 1.4 days (range, 1-6). The mean follow-up was 19.6 months. Lumbar lordosis was significantly restored from $36.4^{\circ}$ preoperatively up to $48.9^{\circ}$ (71.4% of total correction) after LIF and $53.9^{\circ}$ after PSF. Lumbar coronal Cobb was prominently improved from $38.6^{\circ}$ preoperatively to $24.1^{\circ}$ (55.8% of total correction) after LIF, $12.6^{\circ}$ after PSF respectively. The mean pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch was markedly improved from $22.2^{\circ}$ preoperatively to $8.1^{\circ}$ (86.5% of total correction) after LIF, $5.9^{\circ}$ after PSF. Correction of coronal imbalance and sagittal vertebral axis did not reach significance. The rate of perioperative complication was 37.5%. Five patients underwent revision surgery due to wound infection. No major perioperative medical complications occurred. At last follow-up, there were significant improvements in VAS, SF-36 Physical Component Summary and ODI scores. Conclusion : LIF provides significant corrections in the coronal and sagittal plane in the patients with adult degenerative scoliosis. However, LIF combined with staged PSF provides more excellent radiographic and clinical outcomes, with reduced perioperative risk in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.

Keywords

References

  1. Acosta FL, Liu J, Slimack N, Moller D, Fessler R, Koski T : Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study. J Neurosurg Spine 15 : 92-96, 2011 https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.3.SPINE10425
  2. Aharinejad S, Bertagnoli R, Wicke K, Firbas W, Schneider B : Morphometric analysis of vertebrae and intervertebral discs as a basis of disc replacement. Am J Anat 189 : 69-76, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001890109
  3. Amin BY, Mummaneni PV, Ibrahim T, Zouzias A, Uribe J : Four-level minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 35(2 Suppl) : Video 10, 2013
  4. Anand N, Baron EM, Khandehroo B, Kahwaty S : Long-term 2- to 5-year clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38 : 1566-1575, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829cb67a
  5. Anand N, Baron EM, Khandehroo B : Is circumferential minimally invasive surgery effective in the treatment of moderate adult idiopathic scoliosis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472 : 1762-1768, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3565-2
  6. Baghdadi YM, Larson AN, Dekutoski MB, Cui Q, Sebastian AS, Armitage BM, et al. : Sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters after lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative scoliosis: a case-control study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 : E166- E173, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000073
  7. Benner B, Ehni G : Degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 4 : 548-552, 1979
  8. Berjano P, Lamartina C : Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22 Suppl 2 : S242-S253, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2426-5
  9. Berven SH, Deviren V, Smith JA, Hu SH, Bradford DS : Management of fixed sagittal plane deformity: outcome of combined anterior and posterior surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 : 1710-1715; discussion 1716, 2003
  10. Birknes JK, White AP, Albert TJ, Shaffrey CI, Harrop JS : Adult degenerative scoliosis: a review. Neurosurgery 63(3 Suppl) : 94-103, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000325485.49323.B2
  11. Caputo AM, Michael KW, Chapman TM, Jennings JM, Hubbard EW, Isaacs RE, et al. : Extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. J Clin Neurosci 20 : 1558-1563, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2012.12.024
  12. Castro C, Oliveira L, Amaral R, Marchi L, Pimenta L : Is the lateral transpsoas approach feasible for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472 : 1776-1783, 2013
  13. Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, Uribe JS : Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28 : E8, 2010
  14. Grubb SA, Lipscomb HJ, Coonrad RW : Degenerative adult onset scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13 : 241-245, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198803000-00004
  15. Isaacs RE, Hyde J, Goodrich JA, Rodgers WB, Phillips FM : A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: perioperative outcomes and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(26 Suppl) : S322-S330, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182022e04
  16. Johnson RD, Valore A, Villaminar A, Comisso M, Balsano M : Pelvic parameters of sagittal balance in extreme lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disc disease. J Clin Neurosci 20 : 576-581, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2012.05.032
  17. Khajavi K, Shen AY : Two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes of a minimally invasive, lateral, transpsoas approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Eur Spine J 23 : 1215-1223, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3246-6
  18. Lippman CR, Spence CA, Youssef AS, Cahill DW : Correction of adult scoliosis via a posterior-only approach. Neurosurg Focus 14 : e5, 2003
  19. Lonner BS, Murthy SK, Boachie-Adjei O : Single-staged double anterior and posterior spinal reconstruction for rigid adult spinal deformity: a report of four cases. Spine J 5 : 104-108, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.04.008
  20. Mundis GM, Akbarnia BA, Phillips FM : Adult deformity correction through minimally invasive lateral approach techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(26 Suppl) : S312-S321, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318202495f
  21. Oskouian RJ Jr, Shaffrey CI : Degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 17 : 299-315, vii, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2006.05.002
  22. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR : Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6 : 435-443, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.012
  23. Phillips FM, Isaacs RE, Rodgers WB, Khajavi K, Tohmeh AG, Deviren V, et al. : Adult degenerative scoliosis treated with XLIF: clinical and radiographical results of a prospective multicenter study with 24-month follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38 : 1853-1861, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a43f0b
  24. Rhee JM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K, Edwards C, et al. : Staged posterior surgery for severe adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 : 2116-2121, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000090890.02906.A4
  25. Shufflebarger HL, Grimm JO, Bui V, Thomson JD : Anterior and posterior spinal fusion. staged versus same-day surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16 : 930-933, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199108000-00011
  26. Silva FE, Lenke LG : Adult degenerative scoliosis: evaluation and management. Neurosurg Focus 28 : E1, 2010
  27. Tempel ZJ, Gandhoke GS, Bonfield CM, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS : Radiographic and clinical outcomes following combined lateral lumbar interbody fusion and posterior segmental stabilization in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 36 : E11, 2014
  28. Tormenti MJ, Maserati MB, Bonfield CM, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS : Complications and radiographic correction in adult scoliosis following combined transpsoas extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. Neurosurg Focus 28 : E7, 2010
  29. Yadla S, Maltenfort MG, Ratliff JK, Harrop JS : Adult scoliosis surgery outcomes: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 28 : E3, 2010

Cited by

  1. Sagittal spinopelvic alignment after spinal fusion in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a meta-analysis vol.34, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2020.1725437
  2. Limited Cost Benefit of Lateral Interbody Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery vol.46, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000003703
  3. Planned two-stage surgery using lateral lumbar interbody fusion and posterior corrective fusion: a retrospective study of perioperative complications vol.30, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06879-0