The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shear bond strength of luting cements to fixed superstructure metal surfaces under various seating forces

  • Ozer, Fusun (School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) ;
  • Pak-Tunc, Elif (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University) ;
  • Dagli, Nesrin Esen (School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) ;
  • Ramachandran, Deepika (School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) ;
  • Sen, Deniz (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University) ;
  • Blatz, Markus Bernhard (School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania)
  • Received : 2017.10.24
  • Accepted : 2018.08.22
  • Published : 2018.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. In this study, the shear bond strengths (SBS) of luting cements to fixed superstructure metal surfaces under various seating forces were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seven different cements [Polycarboxylate (PCC), Glass-Ionomer (GIC), Zinc phospahate (ZPC), Self-adhesive resin (RXU), Resin (C&B), and Temporary cements ((RXT) and (TCS))] were bonded to a total number of 224 square blocks ($5{\times}5{\times}3mm$) made of one pure metal [Titanium (CP Ti) and two metal alloys [Gold-Platinum (Au-Pt) and Cobalt-Chrome (Co-Cr)] under 10 N and 50 N seating forces. SBS values were determined and data were analyzed with 3-way ANOVA. Pairwise comparisons and interactions among groups were analyzed with Tukey's simultaneous confidence intervals. RESULTS. Overall mean scores indicated that Co-Cr showed the highest SBS values ($1.96{\pm}0.4$) (P<.00), while Au-Pt showed the lowest among all metals tested ($1.57{\pm}0.4$) (P<.00). Except for PCC/CP Ti, RXU/CP Ti, and GIC/Au-Pt factor level combinations (P<.00), the cements tested under 10 N seating force showed no significantly higher SBS values when compared to the values of those tested under 50 N seating force (P>.05). The PCC cement showed the highest mean SBS score ($3.59{\pm}0.07$) among all cements tested (P<.00), while the resin-based temporary luting cement RXT showed the lowest ($0.39{\pm}0.07$) (P<.00). CONCLUSION. Polycarboxylate cement provides reliable bonding performance to metal surfaces. Resin-based temporary luting cements can be used when retrievability is needed. GIC is not suitable for permanent cementation of fixed dental prostheses consisting of CP Ti or Au-Pt substructures.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee A, Okayasu K, Wang HL. Screw- versus cement-retained implant restorations: current concepts. Implant Dent 2010;19: 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181bb9033
  2. Mehl C, Harder S, Steiner M, Vollrath O, Kern M. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns. J Prosthodont 2013;22:618-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12058
  3. Mehl C, Harder S, Shahriari A, Steiner M, Kern M. Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:1106-15.
  4. Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70203-8
  5. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Bogacki MT, Tietge JD. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:737-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90194-F
  6. Heinemann F, Mundt T, Biffar R. Retrospective evaluation of temporary cemented, tooth and implant supported fixed partial dentures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006;34:86-90.
  7. Chaar MS, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:697-711. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02209.x
  8. Mehl C, Harder S, Schwarz D, Steiner M, Vollrath O, Kern M. In vitro influence of ultrasonic stress, removal force preload and thermocycling on the retrievability of implant-retained crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:930-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02236.x
  9. Good ML, Mitchell CA, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. Quantification of all-ceramic crown margin surface profile from tryin to 1-week post-cementation. J Dent 2009;37:65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.011
  10. Watanabe K, Ohnishi E, Kaneshima T, Mine A, Yatani H. Porcelain veneer bonding to enamel with plasma-arc light resin curing. Dent Mater J 2002;21:61-8. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.21.61
  11. Carter SM, Wilson PR. The effects of die-spacing on post-cementation crown elevation and retention. Aust Dent J 1997; 42:192-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1997.tb00121.x
  12. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Lilly KR. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part II. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:885-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90544-K
  13. Vermilyea SG, Kuffler MJ, Huget EF. The effects of die relief agent on the retention of full coverage castings. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:207-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90015-X
  14. Hembree JH Jr, Cooper EW Jr. Effect of die relief on reten- tion of cast crowns and inlays. Oper Dent 1979;4:104-7.
  15. Haddad MF, Rocha EP, Assuncao WG. Cementation of prosthetic restorations: from conventional cementation to dental bonding concept. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:952-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31820fe205
  16. Bagheri R. Film thickness and flow properties of resin-based cements at different temperatures. J Dent (Shiraz) 2013;14:57- 63.
  17. Wilson PR. Low force cementation. J Dent 1996;24:269-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00074-7
  18. Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:327-35.
  19. Piemjai M. Effect of seating force, margin design, and cement on marginal seal and retention of complete metal crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:412-6.
  20. Fonseca RG, de Almeida JG, Haneda IG, Adabo GL. Effect of metal primers on bond strength of resin cements to base metals. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:262-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60050-0
  21. Yoshida K, Kamada K, Tanagawa M, Atsuta M. Shear bond strengths of three resin cements used with three adhesive primers for metal. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:254-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90481-3
  22. Matinlinna JP, Lung CYK, Tsoi JKH. Silane adhesion mechanism in dental applications and surface treatments: A review. Dent Mater 2018;34:13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.002
  23. Özcan M, Matinlinna J. Surface conditioning protocol for the adhesion of resin-based cements to base and noble alloys: How to condition and why? J Adhes Dent 2015;17:372-3.
  24. Cherkasski B, Wilson PR. The effect of oscillation, low seating force and dentine surface treatment on pulpward pressure transmission during crown cementation: a laboratory study. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:957-63. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01168.x
  25. Black S, Amoore JN. Measurement of forces applied during the clinical cementation of dental crowns. Physiol Meas 1993;14:387-92. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/14/3/018
  26. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. 8th ed. NC, John Wiley & Sons, 2012, p. 174-88.
  27. Jorgensen KD. Factors affecting the film thickness of zinc phosphate cements. Acta Odontol Scand 1960;18:479-90. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356009043879
  28. D’Souza R, Shetty O, Puppala P, Shetty N. A better bond: Luting simplified. Int J Prosthet Rest Dent 2012;2:77-81.
  29. Mitchell CA, Abbariki M, Orr JF. The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coverage crowns. Dent Mater 2000;16:198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00009-9
  30. Sen D. Cementation. 1st ed. Istanbul, Quintessence Publishing, 2012. p. 9-31.
  31. Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:343-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130401.x
  32. Hattar S, Hatamleh M, Khraisat A, Al-Rabab'ah M. Shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to base metal alloy. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:411-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.022
  33. Bauer J, Costa JF, Carvalho CN, Souza DN, Loguercio AD, Grande RH. Influence of alloy microstructure on the microshear bond strength of basic alloys to a resin luting cement. Braz Dent J 2012;23:490-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000500004
  34. Raeisosadat F, Ghavam M, Hasani Tabatabaei M, Arami S, Sedaghati M. Bond strength of resin cements to noble and base metal alloys with different surface treatments. J Dent (Tehran) 2014;11:596-603.
  35. Kious AR, Roberts HW, Brackett WW. Film thicknesses of recently introduced luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101: 189-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60026-3
  36. Anusavice KJ. Phillips' Science of dental materials. 11th ed. Missouri, W.B. Saunders Company, 2003. p. 621-54.
  37. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig's restorative dental materials. 13th ed. Philadelphia, Elsevier Mosby, 2012. p. 327-47.
  38. Almilhatti HJ, Neppelenbroek KH, Vergani CE, Machado AL, Pavarina AC, Giampaolo ET. Adhesive bonding of resin composite to various titanium surfaces using different metal conditioners and a surface modification system. J Appl Oral Sci 2013;21:590-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-775720130255
  39. Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS. Effect acidic and alkaline/heat treatments on the bond strength of different luting cements to commercially pure titanium. J Dent 2009;37:255-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.11.021
  40. Kern M, Thompson VP. Durability of resin bonds to pure titanium. J Prosthodont 1995;4:16-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1995.tb00309.x
  41. Technical data sheet RelyX U200. 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA; 2011.
  42. Safety data sheet C&B. BISCO, Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA; 2015.
  43. Yoshida K, Kamada K, Sawase T, Atsuta M. Effect of three adhesive primers for a noble metal on the shear bond strengths of three resin cements. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:14-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00625.x
  44. McIntyre FM, Sorensen SE, Carter JM, Johnson RR. The effect of film thickness on the bond strength of polycarboxylate cement. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:461-7.
  45. Orsi IA, Varoli FK, Pieroni CH, Ferreira MC, Borie E. In vitro tensile strength of luting cements on metallic substrate. Braz Dent J 2014;25:136-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201302290
  46. Subramaniam P, Kondae S, Gupta KK. Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2010;34:309-12. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.34.4.p5h1068v41ggt450
  47. Hibino Y, Kuramochi K, Hoshino T, Moriyama A, Watanabe Y, Nakajima H. Relationship between the strength of glass ionomers and their adhesive strength to metals. Dent Mater 2002;18:552-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00086-0

Cited by

  1. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant-supported prosthesis: An in vitro study vol.12, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.2.75
  2. In Vitro Bonding Performance of Modern Self-Adhesive Resin Cements and Conventional Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements to Prosthetic Substrates vol.10, pp.22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228157
  3. Effect of Cement Layer Thickness on the Immediate and Long-Term Bond Strength and Residual Stress between Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic and Human Dentin vol.14, pp.18, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185153