DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Postoperative malocclusion after maxillofacial fracture management: a retrospective case study

  • Kim, Sang-Yun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Yong-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2018.06.29
  • 심사 : 2018.08.27
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31

초록

Purpose: Various complications occur when a maxillofacial fracture is malunionized or improperly resolved. Malocclusion is the most common complication, followed by facial deformity, temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD), and neurological symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dental treatment of postoperative complications after maxillofacial fracture. Materials and methods: In this study, nine patients with a postoperative complication after maxillofacial fracture who had been performed the initial operation from other units and were referred to the authors' department had been included. Of the nine patients, six had mandibular fractures, one had maxillary fractures, one had maxillary and mandibular complex fractures, and one had multiple facial fractures. All the patients had tooth fractures, dislocations, displacements, and alveolar bone fractures at the time of trauma, but complications occurred because none of the patients underwent preoperative and postoperative dental treatment. Malocclusion and TMD are the most common complications, followed by dental problems (pulp necrosis, tooth extrusion, osteomyelitis, etc.) due to improper treatment of teeth and alveolar bone injuries. The patients were referred to the department of dentistry to undergo treatment for the complications. One of the nine patients underwent orthognathic surgery for a severe open bite. Another patient underwent bone reconstruction using an iliac bone graft and vestibuloplasty with extensive bone loss. The other patients, who complained of moderate occlusal abnormalities and TMDs such as mouth-opening limitation, underwent occlusal treatment by prosthodontic repair and temporomandibular joint treatment instead of surgery. Results: One patient who underwent orthognathic surgery had complete loss of open bite and TMD after surgery. One patient who underwent reconstruction using an iliac bone graft had a good healing process. Other patients were treated with splint, injection, and physical therapy for mouth-opening limitation and temporomandibular joint pain. After treatment, the TMDs were resolved, but the remaining occlusal abnormalities were resolved with prosthetic restoration. Conclusions: Considering the severity of malocclusion and TMJ symptom and the feasibillity of reoperation, nonsurgical methods such as orthodontic and prosthodontic treatments and splint therapy can be used to manage the dental and TMD complication after the trauma surgery. However, reoperation needs to be strongly considered for severe malocclusion and TMD problem.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim YK, Yun PY, Kim JH (2005) Evaluation of efficacy of TMJ arthrocentesis in the patients with mandibular fracture. J Korean Oral Maxillofac Surg 31:532-535
  2. Iatrou I, Theologie-Lygidakis N, Tzerbos F (2010) Surgical protocols and outcome for the treatment of maxillofacial fractures in children: 9 years' experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 38(7):511-516 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2010.02.008
  3. de Matos FP, Arnez MF, Sverzut CE, Trivellato AE (2010) A retrospective study of mandibular fracture in a 40-month period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39(1):10-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.10.005
  4. Zweig BE (2009) Complications of mandibular fractures. Atlas Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am 17:93-101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2008.10.005
  5. Singaram M, Udhayakumar RK (2016) Prevalence, pattern, etiology, and management of maxillofacial trauma in a developing country: a retrospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:174-181 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.4.174
  6. Vega LG (2011) Reoperative mandibular trauma: management of posttraumatic mandibular deformities. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am 23:47-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2010.12.003
  7. Khandeparker PVS, Dhupar V, Khandeparker RVS et al (2016) Transbuccal versus transoral approach for management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, clinical and radiographic study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:144-150 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.3.144
  8. Koury M (1997) Complications of mandibular fractures. In: Kaban L, Pogrel A, Perrott D (eds) Complications in oral and maxillofacial surgery, 1st edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 121-146
  9. Haug RH, Schwimmer A (1994) Fibrous union of the mandible: a review of 27 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52(8):832-839 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(94)90230-5
  10. Mathog RH, Toma V, Clayman L et al (2000) Nonunion of the mandible: an analysis of contributing factors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58(7):746-752 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2000.7258
  11. Ellis E (1996) Complications of rigid internal fixation for mandibular fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma 2(2):32-39
  12. Ellis E, Walker R (2009) Treatment of malocclusion and TMJ dysfunction secondary to condylar fractures. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstruct 2(1):1-18 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1102900
  13. Ellis E, Throckmorton G (2005) Treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures: biological considerations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63(1):115-134 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.02.019
  14. Steidler NE, Cook RM, Reade PC (1980) Residual complications in patients with major middle third facial fractures. Int J Oral Surg 9(4):259-266 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9785(80)80032-9
  15. Yadav S, Mittal HC, Malik S, Dhupar V, Sachdeva A, Malhotra V, Singh G, Yadav S, Mittal HC, Malik S et al (2016) Post-traumatic and postoperative neurosensory deficits of the inferior alveolar nerve in mandibular fracture: a prospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 42(5):259-264 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.5.259
  16. Lim HY, Jung TY, Park SJ (2017) Evaluation of postoperative complications according to treatment of third molars in mandibular angle fracture. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:37-41 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.1.37

피인용 문헌

  1. Bioactive surface-modified Ti with titania nanotube arrays to design endoprosthesis for maxillofacial surgery: structural formation, morphology, physical properties and osseointegration vol.15, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605x/ab763c
  2. Osteotomy and iliac bone graft for the treatment of malunion caused by failed mandibular fracture reduction vol.21, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00395
  3. The role of prosthetic, orthodontic and implant-supported rehabilitation in the management of secondary malocclusion to maxillofacial trauma- A systematic review vol.33, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.12.004
  4. Recovery of Post-Traumatic Temporomandibular Joint after Mandibular Fracture Immobilization: A Literature Review vol.11, pp.21, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110239