Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • 제40권
  • /
  • Pages.18.1-18.6
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
대한악안면성형재건외과학회 (Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Postoperative long-term results for the comparison of the symmetry of the upper lip during lip closure according to Millard and Pfeifer

  • 투고 : 2018.05.31
  • 심사 : 2018.06.27
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: Clefts in newborns are associated with severe morphological and functional impairment. Especially the lip is of importance as if the treatment result is unsatisfactory, it can lead to psychological changes in the patient. Different operative procedures have been developed over the last decades. The aim of the presented study was the comparison of the surgical techniques according to Millard and Pfeifer regarding the temporal development of the postoperative symmetry of the lip height and mouth width. Methods: Digitized photographs of patients from the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery at the University of Göttingen were evaluated from 1979 to 1996. With a video analysis program, the lip height and mouth width were analyzed regarding the symmetry. We demonstrated the symmetry values over a period of 8 years in order to show the influence of growth on postoperative results. Results: The development of the vertical symmetry of the Philtrum and the lip vermillion on the cleft side in comparison to the healthy side behaves differently depending on Pfeifer and Millard. The lip height of the cleft lip was shorter in both techniques than on the healthy side, but Pfeifer's difference was significantly more pronounced. The lip vermillion height on the cleft side was slightly shorter in the Millard group and markedly larger in the Pfeifer group. Both techniques can achieve good symmetry results for the vertical dimension of the lip. According to Pfeifer, the development of the horizontal dimension on the cleft side is bigger within the first 4 years than on the healthy side; according to the Millard technique, the horizontal development is smaller. These differences are greater within the first 6 years and approach between the 6th and 8th year. Conclusions: The Millard technique demonstrates better results concerning the philtrum and vermillion symmetry during growth within the first 6 years. Over the whole study period, growth corrects the philtrum and vermillion symmetry within the Pfeifer group.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Tolarova MM, Cervenka J (1998) Classification and birth prevalence of orofacial clefts. Am J Med Genet 75:126-137. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19980113)75:2<126::AID-AJMG2>3.0.CO;2-R
  2. Aniansson G, Svensson H, Becker M, Ingvarsson L (2002) Otitis media and feeding with breast milk of children with cleft palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 36:9-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/028443102753478318
  3. Burt JD, Byrd HS (2000) Cleft lip: unilateral primary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:1043-1055 quiz 1056-1047. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200003000-00032
  4. Le MA (1949) A method of cutting and suturing the lip in the treatment of complete unilateral clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 4:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-194901000-00001
  5. Tennison CW (1952) The repair of the unilateral cleft lip by the stencil method. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 9:115-120. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-195202000-00005
  6. Millard DR (1968) Extensions of the rotation-advancement principle for wide unilateral cleft lips. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:535-544. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196812000-00004
  7. Knezevic P, Vuletic M, Blivajs I, Dediol E, Macan D, Virag M (2017) The modification of rotation-advancement flap made in 1950. Acta Stomatol Croat 51:60-64. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc51/1/8
  8. Pfeifer G (1970) Lip corrections following earlier cleft surgery by way of wave-line incisions. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 25:569-576.
  9. Madzharov MM, Madzharova LM (1992) Age-dependent changes in the size of the upper lip in Bulgarians. Acta Chir Plast 34:71-78.
  10. Fasika OM (1993) Lip parameters in Nigerian children. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:446-449. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199303000-00009
  11. Lee TJ (1999) Upper lip measurements at the time of surgery and follow-up after modified rotation-advancement flap repair in unilateral cleft lip patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:911-915. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199909020-00003
  12. Randal P (1975) Cleft Lip Clin Plast Surg 2:215-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1298(20)30069-9
  13. Kirsten K (1982) Vergleichende Untersuchungen an zwei Kindergruppen mit operierten Lippenspalten zur Bewertung des Wellenschnittverfahrens. In: Proceedings of the Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspalten. Thieme-Verlag, Stuttgart.
  14. Maerker R, Bull H (1982) Ergebnisse bei Schulkindern nach primarer Lippenplastik mit dem Wellenschnittverfahren. In: Gs P (ed) Proceedings of the Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspalten. Thieme-Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 43-46.
  15. Bitter K (2000) Chirurgische Erstbehandlung der Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspalten im Jahr 2000. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 4. 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022960
  16. Mohler LR (1987) Unilateral cleft lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 80:511-517. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198710000-00005
  17. Ness JA, Sykes JM (1993) Basics of Millard rotation-advancement technique for repair of the unilateral cleft lip deformity. Facial Plast Surg 9:167-176. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1064608
  18. Becker M, Svensson H, McWilliam J, Sarnas KV, Jacobsson S (1998) Millard repair of unilateral isolated cleft lip: a 25-year follow-up. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 32:387-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/02844319850158471
  19. Mulliken JB, Martinez-Perez D (1999) The principle of rotation advancement for repair of unilateral complete cleft lip and nasal deformity: technical variations and analysis of results. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:1247-1260. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199910000-00003
  20. Saunders DE, Malek A, Karandy E (1986) Growth of the cleft lip following a triangular flap repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:227-238. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198602000-00009
  21. Noordhoff J, Chen Y, Chen K, Hong K, Lo L (1995) The surgical technique for the complete unilateral cleft lip-nasal deformaty. Oper Tech Plast Reconstr Surg 2:167-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-0949(95)80006-9
  22. Vander Woude DL, Mulliken JB (1997) Effect of lip adhesion on labial height in two-stage repair of unilateral complete cleft lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 100: 567-572 discussion 573-564. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199709000-00001
  23. Cho B (2001) Unilateral complete cleft lip and palate repair using lip adhesion and passive alveolar molding appliance. J Craniofac Surg 12:148-156. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200103000-00012
  24. Millard DR Jr, Latham RA (1990) Improved primary surgical and dental treatment of clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:856-871. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199011000-00006
  25. Noordhoff J (1984) Reconstruction of vermillion in unilateral and bilateral cleft lips. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 73:52-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198401000-00011
  26. Lewis MB (1993) Unilateral cleft lip repair. Z-plasty. Clin Plast Surg 20:647-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1298(20)32434-2