Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • Volume 40
  • /
  • Pages.8.1-8.6
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The influence of bone graft procedures on primary stability and bone change of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets

  • Jun, Sang Ho (Department of Dentistry, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Park, Chang-Joo (Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Hwang, Suk-Hyun (Department of Medicine, Korea University Graduate School) ;
  • Lee, Youn Ki (Department of Medicine, Korea University Graduate School) ;
  • Zhou, Cong (Department of Medicine, Korea University Graduate School) ;
  • Jang, Hyon-Seok (Department of Dentistry, Korea University Ansan Hospital) ;
  • Ryu, Jae-Jun (Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Korea University Anam Hospital)
  • Received : 2018.02.04
  • Accepted : 2018.03.13
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: This study was to evaluate the effect of bone graft procedure on the primary stability of implants installed in fresh sockets and assess the vertical alteration of peri-implant bone radiographically. Methods: Twenty-three implants were inserted in 18 patients immediately after tooth extraction. The horizontal gap between the implant and bony walls of the extraction socket was grafted with xenografts. The implant stability before and after graft procedure was measured by Osstell Mentor as implant stability quotient before bone graft (ISQ bbg) and implant stability quotient after bone graft (ISQ abg). Peri-apical radiographs were taken to measure peri-implant bone change immediately after implant surgery and 12 months after implant placement. Data were analyzed by independent t test; the relationships between stability parameters (insertion torque value (ITV), ISQ abg, and ISQ bbg) and peri-implant bone changes were analyzed according to Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: The increase of ISQ in low primary stability group (LPSG) was 6.87 ± 3.62, which was significantly higher than the increase in high primary stability group (HPSG). A significant correlation between ITV and ISQ bbg (R = 0.606, P = 0.002) was found; however, age and peri-implant bone change were not found significantly related to implant stability parameters. It was presented that there were no significant peri-implant bone changes at 1 year after bone graft surgery. Conclusions: Bone graft procedure is beneficial for increasing the primary stability of immediately placed implants, especially when the ISQ of implants is below 65 and that bone grafts have some effects on peri-implant bone maintenance.

Keywords

References

  1. Becker W (2006) Immediate implant placement: treatment planning and surgical steps for successful outcomes. Br Dent J 201:199-205 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813881
  2. Gelb DA (1993) Immediate implant surgery: three-year retrospective evaluation of 50 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 8:388-399
  3. Rosenquist B, Ahmed M (2000) The immediate replacement of teeth by dental implants using homologous bone membranes to seal the sockets: clinical and radiographic findings. Clin Oral Implants Res 11:572-582 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011006572.x
  4. Malo P, Friberg B, Polizzi G, Gualini F, Vighagen T, Rangert B (2003) Immediate and early function of Branemark System implants placed in the esthetic zone: a 1-year prospective clinical multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 5(Suppl 1):37-46 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00014.x
  5. Kim DW, Heo HA, Lim SG, Lee W, Kim YS, Pyo SW (2011) Bone response around immediately placed titanium implant in the extraction socket of diabetic and insulin-treated rat maxilla. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:30-35 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2011.37.1.30
  6. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada J (2003) Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:31-39
  7. Ha JW, Kim SG, Kim HH, Moon SY, Lim SC (2008) Histomorphometric analysis of an immediate non-functional loaded implant in dogs. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:90-94
  8. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a longlasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 52:155-170 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  9. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Willings M, Coulthard P, Worthington HV (2007) The effectiveness of immediate, early, and conventional loading of dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22:893-904
  10. Araujo MG, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J (2006) Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 17:606-614 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01315.x
  11. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T (2003) Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 23:313-323
  12. Chen ST, Buser D (2009) Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24:186-217
  13. Ortega-Martinez J, Perez-Pascual T, Mareque-Bueno S, Hernandez-Alfaro F, Ferres-Padro E (2012) Immediate implants following tooth extraction. A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 17:251-261
  14. Spinato S, Agnini A, Chiesi M, Agnini AM, Wang HL (2012) Comparison between graft and no-graft in an immediate placed and immediate nonfunctional loaded implant. Implant Dent 21:97-103 https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e318248866c
  15. Harel N, Moses O, Palti A, Ormianer Z (2013) Long-term results of implants immediately placed into extraction sockets grafted with ${\beta}$-tricalcium phosphate: a retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:e63-e68
  16. Tozum TF, Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA (2008) Relationship between dental implant stability determined by resonance frequency analysis measurements and peri-implant vertical defects: an in vitro study. J Oral Rehabil 35:739-744 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01840.x
  17. Zhou C, Yu LM, Dong C, Cong LY, Shi HB, Jun SH, Kwon JJ, Jiang L, Jin GC (2015) The stability analysis of implants installed in osteotomies with different types of controlled bone defects. J Wuhan Univ Technol-Mat Sci Edit 1:210-215
  18. Akca K, Kokat AM, Comert A, Akkocaoglu M, Tekdemir I, Cehreli MC (2010) Torque-fitting and resonance frequency analyses of implants in conventional sockets versus controlled bone defects in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:169-173 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.11.019
  19. Rabel A, Kohler SG, Schmidt-Westhausen AM (2007) Clinical study on the primary stability of two dental implant systems with resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Investig 11:257-265 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0115-2
  20. Santos PL, Gulinelli JL, Telles Cda S, Betoni Junior W, Okamoto R, Chiacchio Buchignani V, Queiroz TP (2013) Bone substitutes for peri-implant defects of postextraction implants. Int J Biomater 2013:307136
  21. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J (2004) Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 31:820-828 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.x
  22. Mc Glumphy EA, Larsen PF (2003) Contemporary implant dentistry. In: Peterson LJ, Ellis E, Hupp JR et al (eds) Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery, 4th edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 305-342
  23. Viswambaran M, Arora V, Tripathi RC, Dhiman RK (2014) Clinical evaluation of immediate implants using different types of bone augmentation materials. Med J Armed Forces India 70:154-162 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.04.020
  24. Atalay B, Oncu B, Emes Y, Bultan O, Aybar B, Yalcin S (2013) Immediate implant placement without bone grafting: a retrospective study of 110 cases with 5 years of follow-up. Implant Dent 22:360-365 https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31828edd02
  25. Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J (2003) Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 30:809-818 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00366.x
  26. Scala A, Lang NP, Schweikert MT, de Oliveira JA, Rangel-Garcia I Jr, Botticelli D (2014) Sequential healing of open extraction sockets. An experimental study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 25:288-295
  27. Barone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Calvo Guirado JL, Covani U (2008) Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol 79:1370-1377 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070628

Cited by

  1. Primary stability of implants with peri-implant bone defects of various widths: an in vitro investigation vol.49, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2019.49.1.39
  2. Evaluation of the Bone Regeneration Effect of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein-2 on Subperiosteal Bone Graft in the Rat Calvarial Model vol.12, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101613
  3. Bone Regeneration in Peri-Implant Defect Using Autogenous Tooth Biomaterial Enriched with Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Animal Model vol.10, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10061939
  4. Effect of Ultraviolet Irradiation on Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Comparative Histomorphometric Study in Canine Models vol.10, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124216
  5. Dental Implants Inserted in Fresh Extraction Sockets versus Healed Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.14, pp.24, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247903