Is hyperbaric oxygen therapy more effective than normobaric oxygen therapy for improving acute neuropsychologic status due to carbon monoxide poisoning?

고압산소치료가 정상압 산소치료에 비해 일산화탄소 중독의 급성 신경-정신 상태 개선에 더 효과적인가?

  • Koh, Chan Young (Department of Emergency Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Hyun Young (Department of Emergency Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Han Joo (Department of Emergency Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine)
  • 고찬영 (단국대학교 의과대학 응급의학교실) ;
  • 조현영 (단국대학교 의과대학 응급의학교실) ;
  • 최한주 (단국대학교 의과대학 응급의학교실)
  • Received : 2018.04.08
  • Accepted : 2018.10.10
  • Published : 2018.10.31

Abstract

Objective: The evidence that hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy is more effective for improving the acute neuropsychological status (ANS) of carbon monoxide poisoning than normobaric oxygen (NBO) therapy is not convincing. This is because the levels of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) do not correlate with the clinical severity of carbon monoxide poisoning and there is no universally accepted severity scale of carbon monoxide poisoning. This paper suggests a new scale for the clinical and neurological severity of carbon monoxide poisoning, called the ANS, and assesses the effect of HBO therapy for each level of ANS compared to NBO therapy. Methods: A total of 217 patients who had been hospitalized because of carbon monoxide poisoning from January 2009 to July 2013 were studied. ANS was suggested as a new severity scale of carbon monoxide poisoning considered in the Glasgow Coma Scale, acute neuro-psychologic signs and symptoms, or cardiac ischemia on the initial medical contact. HBO therapy is indicated in those who have a loss of consciousness, seizure, coma, abnormal findings on a neurological examination, pregnancy, persistent cardiac ischemia, level of COHb >25%, or severe metabolic acidosis (pH <7.2). The end point is the day of discharge, and recovery is defined as a normal neuro-psychological status without any sequelae. Results: The levels of troponin T and creatinine increased significantly with increasing ANS score. In the moderate to severe group (ANS 2 and 3), the recovery rate was significantly higher when treated with HBO therapy than with NBO therapy (P=0.030). On the other hand, the development of delayed neuro-psychological sequelae (DNS) did not correlate with any level of ANS, type of oxygen therapy, or recovery on discharge. Conclusion: In the moderate to severe poisoned group, HBO therapy is more effective for improving the ANS from carbon monoxide poisoning than NBO therapy. On the other hand, the development of DNS of HBO therapy is no more preventable than with NBO therapy. Although the level of ANS is low, the patient needs to be provided with sufficient information and a follow-up visit is recommended for any abnormal symptoms because the ANS does not correlate with the development and degree of DNS.

Keywords

References

  1. O'Donnell P, Buxton PJ, Pitkin A, Jarvis LJ. The magnetic resonance imaging appearances of the brain in acute carbon monoxide poisoning. Clin Radiol 2000;55:273-80. https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.1999.0369
  2. Prockop LD, Chichkova RI. Carbon monoxide intoxication: an updated review. J Neurol Sci 2007;262:122-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2007.06.037
  3. Prockop LD. Carbon monoxide brain toxicity: clinical, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and neuropsychological effects in 9 people. J Neuroimaging 2005;15:144-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2005.tb00299.x
  4. Choi IS. Delayed neurologic sequelae in carbon monoxide intoxication. Arch Neurol 1983;40:433-5. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1983.04050070063016
  5. Guzman JA. Carbon monoxide poisoning. Crit Care Clin 2012;28:537-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2012.07.007
  6. Weaver LK, Hopkins RO, Larson-Lorh V, Howe S, Haberstock D. Double blind, controlled, prospective, randomized clinical trial (RCT) in patients with acute carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning: outcome of patients tested with normobaric oxygen or hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2): an interim report. Undersea Hyperb Med 1995;22(Suppl):14.
  7. Thom SR, Taber RL, Mendiguren II, Clark JM, Hardy KR, Fisher AB. Delayed neuropsychologic sequelae after carbon monoxide poisoning: prevention by treatment with hyperbaric oxygen. Ann Emerg Med 1995;25:474-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70261-X
  8. Hampson NB, Scott KL, Zmaeff JL. Carboxyhemoglobin measurement by hospitals: implications for the diagnosis of carbon monoxide poisoning. J Emerg Med 2006;31:13-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.09.010
  9. Seger D. The science (or lack thereof) in the treatment of carbon monoxide poisoning. Am J Emerg Med 1994;12:389-90.
  10. Varon J, Marik PE, Fromm RE Jr, Gueler A. Carbon monoxide poisoning: a review for clinicians. J Emerg Med 1999;17:87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-4679(98)00128-0
  11. Ely EW, Moorehead B, Haponik EF. Warehouse workers' headache: emergency evaluation and management of 30 patients with carbon monoxide poisoning. Am J Med 1995;98:145-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80398-2
  12. Buckley NA, Juurlink DN, Isbister G, Bennett MH, Lavonas EJ. Hyperbaric oxygen for carbon monoxide poisoning. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(4):CD002041.
  13. Silver S, Smith C, Worster A; BEEM (Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine) Team. Should hyperbaric oxygen be used for carbon monoxide poisoning? CJEM 2006;8:43-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1481803500013385
  14. Kao LW, Nanagas KA. Carbon monoxide poisoning. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2004;22:985-1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2004.05.003
  15. Dean BS, Verdile VP, Krenzelok EP. Coma reversal with cerebral dysfunction recovery after repetitive hyperbaric oxygen therapy for severe carbon monoxide poisoning. Am J Emerg Med 1993;11:616-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-6757(93)90016-5
  16. Deng DH, You ZQ, Qi B. Clinical effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on groupment acute carbon monoxide poisoning. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi 2013;31:540-1.
  17. Pang L, Wu Y, Dong N, et al. Elevated serum ubiquitin Cterminal hydrolase-L1 levels in patients with carbon monoxide poisoning. Clin Biochem 2014;47:72-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.09.015
  18. Grieb G, Simons D, Schmitz L, Piatkowski A, Grottke O, Pallua N. Glasgow Coma Scale and laboratory markers are superior to COHb in predicting CO intoxication severity. Burns 2011;37:610-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2010.03.007
  19. Ilano AL, Raffin TA. Management of carbon monoxide poisoning. Chest 1990;97:165-9. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.97.1.165
  20. Coburn RF, Forster RE, Kane PB. Considerations of the physiological variables that determine the blood carboxyhemoglobin concentration in man. J Clin Invest 1965;44:1899-910. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI105296
  21. Grieb G, Groger A, Bozkurt A, Stoffels I, Piatkowski A, Pallua N. The diversity of carbon monoxide intoxication: medical courses can differ extremely: a case report. Inhal Toxicol 2008;20:911-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/08958370802074890
  22. Hampson NB, Dunn SL; UHMCS/CDC CO Poisoning Surveillance Group. Symptoms of carbon monoxide poisoning do not correlate with the initial carboxyhemoglobin level. Undersea Hyperb Med 2012;39:657-65.
  23. Elkharrat D. Indications of normobaric and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in acute CO intoxication. In: Proceedings Satellite Meeting IUTOX, VIIIth International Congress of Toxicology; 1998 Jul 3-4; Dijon, France.
  24. Hu H, Pan X, Wan Y, Zhang Q, Liang W. Factors affecting the prognosis of patients with delayed encephalopathy after acute carbon monoxide poisoning. Am J Emerg Med 2011;29:261-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2009.09.030
  25. Ajam K, Gold LS, Beck SS, Damon S, Phelps R, Rea TD. Reliability of the Cerebral Performance Category to classify neurological status among survivors of ventricular fibrillation arrest: a cohort study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011;19:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-19-38