Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery

Korean Orthopaedic Association (대한정형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Morphometric Variations in the Volar Aspect of the Distal Radius

  • Kwon, Bong Cheol (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Joon Kyu (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Suk Yoon (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Hwang, Jae Yeun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Seo, Jang-Hyeon (Jeil Medical Corporation)
  • Received : 2018.06.11
  • Accepted : 2018.07.23
  • Published : 2018.12.01
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Significant discrepancy exists between anatomical plate designs and the anatomy of the native distal radius, which may be attributable to considerable morphometric variations in the volar aspect of the distal radius. We aimed to evaluate the degree of variability in the morphometry of the distal radius and identify factors associated with this variability. Methods: We measured the volar surface angle (VSA) of the intermediate and lateral columns and the volar surface width (VSW) in the distal radius from three-dimensional computed tomography scans acquired from 81 cadaveric forearms. These morphometric parameters were compared between the lateral and intermediate columns, between males and females, and between Koreans and Caucasians. Caucasian morphometric data were obtained and pooled from the previous studies. The coefficient of variation was used to assess the variability of the parameters and Cohen's d to estimate the effect size of the difference between groups. Results: The average VSA of the lateral column was $22^{\circ}{\pm}6^{\circ}$, and that of the intermediate column was $29^{\circ}{\pm}8^{\circ}$ in Koreans (p < 0.001). The variability was high for both VSAs. The VSA of the intermediate column was significantly larger in males than in females (p < 0.001) and in Caucasians than in Koreans (p < 0.001). The average VSW of distal radius was $30{\pm}3mm$ at the watershed line, and it became narrower proximally. The VSW was significantly larger in males than in females (p < 0.001) and in Koreans than in Caucasians (p < 0.001). The effect sizes of the difference for the VSA and VSW between sexes, races and columns were medium to large. Conclusions: Considerable variability exists in the morphometry of the volar distal radius, with sex, race, and column as contributing factors. These results suggest that surgeons should carefully choose an anatomical volar locking plate with appropriate angulation characteristics for each patient to achieve patient-specific alignment of the distal radius.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI)

References

  1. Rikli DA, Regazzoni P. Fractures of the distal end of the radius treated by internal fixation and early function: a preliminary report of 20 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996; 78(4):588-92. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199604000-00014
  2. Jakob M, Rikli DA, Regazzoni P. Fractures of the distal radius treated by internal fixation and early function: a prospective study of 73 consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(3):340-4. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.82B3.0820340
  3. Orbay JL, Fernandez DL. Volar fixation for dorsally displaced fractures of the distal radius: a preliminary report. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27(2):205-15. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2002.32081
  4. Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in the United States in the treatment of distal radial fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(8):1868-73. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01297
  5. Richard MJ, Wartinbee DA, Riboh J, Miller M, Leversedge FJ, Ruch DS. Analysis of the complications of palmar plating versus external fixation for fractures of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(10):1614-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.06.030
  6. Sammer DM, Fuller DS, Kim HM, Chung KC. A comparative study of fragment-specific versus volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(5):1441-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181891677
  7. Osada D, Kamei S, Masuzaki K, Takai M, Kameda M, Tamai K. Prospective study of distal radius fractures treated with a volar locking plate system. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(5):691-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.024
  8. Wei DH, Raizman NM, Bottino CJ, Jobin CM, Strauch RJ, Rosenwasser MP. Unstable distal radial fractures treated with external fixation, a radial column plate, or a volar plate: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(7):1568-77. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00722
  9. Mignemi ME, Byram IR, Wolfe CC, et al. Radiographic outcomes of volar locked plating for distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(1):40-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.10.007
  10. Knudsen R, Bahadirov Z, Damborg F. High rate of complications following volar plating of distal radius fractures. Dan Med J. 2014;61(10):A4906.
  11. Jones CW, Lawson RD. One size does not fit all: distal radioulnar joint dysfunction after volar locking plate fixation. J Wrist Surg. 2014;3(1):42-5. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1364096
  12. Casaletto JA, Machin D, Leung R, Brown DJ. Flexor pollicis longus tendon ruptures after palmar plate fixation of fractures of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009;34(4):471-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193408100964
  13. Soong M, Earp BE, Bishop G, Leung A, Blazar P. Volar locking plate implant prominence and flexor tendon rupture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(4):328-35. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00193
  14. Buzzell JE, Weikert DR, Watson JT, Lee DH. Precontoured fixed-angle volar distal radius plates: a comparison of anatomic fit. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(7):1144-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.02.029
  15. Oppermann J, Wacker M, Stein G, et al. Anatomical fit of seven different palmar distal radius plates. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(10):1483-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2072-y
  16. Evans S, Ramasamy A, Deshmukh SC. Distal volar radial plates: how anatomical are they? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(3):293-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.11.014
  17. Gasse N, Lepage D, Pem R, et al. Anatomical and radiological study applied to distal radius surgery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2011;33(6):485-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0754-x
  18. Oppermann J, Bredow J, Beyer F, et al. Distal radius: anatomical morphometric gender characteristics. Do anatomical pre-shaped plates pay attention on it? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(1):133-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2112-7
  19. Kwak DS, Lee JY, Im JH, Song HJ, Park D. Do volar locking plates fit the volar cortex of the distal radius? J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017;42(3):266-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193416676704
  20. Leal DH, de Faria Filho DE, Oliveira EM. Classification of the coefficients of variation of parameters evaluated in Japanese quail experiments. Braz J Poult Sci. 2014;16(2):97-100.
  21. Sedgwick P. Randomised controlled trials: understanding effect sizes. BMJ. 2015;350:h1690. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1690

Cited by

  1. Anatomical-positional relationship between the bone structure of the distal radius and flexor pollicis longus tendon using ultrasonography vol.41, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02216-9
  2. Bony Anatomy around the Watershed Line of the Distal Radius vol.10, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1719031