대한작업치료학회지 (Korean Journal of Occupational Therapy)

  • 제26권4호
  • /
  • Pages.127-143
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1226-0134(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-4450(eISSN)
대한작업치료학회 (Korean Society of Occupational Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

뇌졸중 이후 운전 시뮬레이터와 Dynavision 훈련이 인지 및 운전 수행 능력에 미치는 효과 비교

Comparing Effects of Driving Simulator and Dynavision Training on Cognitive Ability and Driving Performance After Stroke

  • 최성열 (광주여자대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 이재신 (건양대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 김수경 (건양대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 차태현 (건양대학교 작업치료학과)
  • Choi, Seong-Youl (Department of Occupational Therapy, Kwangju women's University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Shin (Department of Occupational Therapy, Konyang University) ;
  • Kim, Su-Kyoung (Department of Occupational Therapy, Konyang University) ;
  • Cha, Tae-Hyun (Department of Occupational Therapy, Konyang University)
  • 투고 : 2018.07.30
  • 심사 : 2018.11.26
  • 발행 : 2018.12.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구목적 : 본 연구의 목적은 뇌졸중 환자에게 운전 시뮬레이터와 Dynavision 훈련의 효과를 인지 평가와 주행 중 운전수행 능력 평가를 통해 비교하고, 두 가지 훈련방법의 차이에 대한 임상적 근거를 제시하는 것이다. 연구방법 : 본 연구를 위해 뇌졸중 환자 21명을 선정하여 무작위로 운전 시뮬레이터 훈련 집단(N=11)과 Dynavision 훈련 집단(N=10)으로 분류하고 각각 15회기의 훈련을 실시하였다. 대상자들의 주행 중 운전수행 능력 측정을 위해 운전 시뮬레이터 시나리오 시스템 평가를 실시하였고, 인지 능력을 측정하기 위해 DriveABLE Cognitive Assessment Tool(DCAT), Trail Making Test-A, Trail Making Test-B 그리고 Mini Mental State Examination-K 평가를 실시하였다. 결과 : 운전 시뮬레이터 훈련 집단은 모든 인지 능력평가와 대부분 운전수행 능력에서 통계적으로 유의미한 향상이 확인되었다. Dynavision 훈련 집단은 Trail Making Test-A를 제외한 모든 인지 능력 평가와 브레이크 페달 반응시간, 중앙선 침범 평균 시간 및 비율, 차선이탈 비율의 운전수행 능력에서 통계적으로 유의미하게 향상 되었다. 그리고 두 가지 훈련의 변화량은 도로주행평가의 결과 예측 지수와, 충돌사고 및 위험상황 발생 횟수에서 유의미한 차이를 보였으며, 이 변수들의 변화량은 두 가지 훈련방법의 적용 차이에 따라 모든 변수가 20% 이상의 인과적 영향력이 있음이 확인되었다. 결론 : 뇌졸중 환자의 운전훈련 방법으로 운전 시뮬레이터와 Dynavision 훈련은 모두 효과적인 중재방법임을 확인하였다. 특히 운전 시뮬레이터는 뇌졸중 환자의 운전수행 능력 전반을 향상시킬 수 있는 효과적인 훈련이며, Dynavision 훈련과는 20%의 설명력으로 훈련효과의 차이가 확인되었다.

Objective : The purpose of this study was to compare with the effects of driving simulator and Dynavision training after stroke through the test of cognitive ability and driving performance. Methods : Twenty-one stroke patients were randomly classified to the driving simulator training group (N=11) and Dynavision training group (N=10), and were carried out respectively training for 15 times. The driving performances was measured by the driving simulator test, and cognitive-perceptive abilities was measured by the DriveABLE Cognitive Assessment Tool, Trail Making Test-A, Trail Making Test-B and Mini Mental State Examination-K. Results : The driving simulator training group showed significant changes in all cognitive tests and most of driving performances. The Dynavision training group also showed significant changes in all cognitive tests except for Trail Making Test-A and some driving performances. The significant differences on both groups were found regarding the estimated degree of results on the on-road evaluation, the number of off road accidents and collisions. In addition, the causal influence of the two training methods on these variables was analyzed to be more than 20%. Conclusion : The driving simulator and Dynavision training were found to be effective intervention in the driving rehabilitation after stroke. In particular, it was confirmed that the driving simulator is an effective training to improve overall driving ability of stroke patients. In addition, the difference in training effect between the two training methods was found to be more than 20%.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Akinwuntan, A. E., De Weerdt, W., Feys, H., Pauwels, J., Baten, G., Arno, P., & Kiekens, C. (2005). Effect of simulator training on driving after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Neurology, 65, 843-850. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000171749.7 1919.fa
  2. Akinwuntan, A. E., Wachtel, J., & Rosen, P. N. (2012). Driving simulation for evaluation and rehabilitation of driving after stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 21, 478-486. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.12.001
  3. Anstey, K. J., Wood, J., Lord, S., & Walker, J. G. (2005). Cognitive, sensory and physical factors enabling driving safety in older adults. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(1), 45-65. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2004.07.008
  4. Blane, A., Lee, H. C., Falkmer, T., & Willstrand, T. D. (2017). Assessing cognitive ability and simulator-based driving performance in poststroke adults. Behavioural Neurology, 2017(1), 1-9. doi:10.1155/2017/1378308
  5. Casutt, G., Theill, N., Martin, M., Keller, M., & Jancke, L. (2014). The drive-wise project: Driving simulator training increases real driving performance in healthy older drivers. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6(1), 85. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00085
  6. Cimolino, N., & Balkovec, D. (1988). The contribution of a driving simulator in the driving evaluation of stroke and disabled adolescent clients. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(3), 119-125. doi:10.1177/000841748805500304
  7. Crotty, M., & George, S. (2009). Retraining visual processing skills to improve driving ability after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90, 2096-2102. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.08.143
  8. Crundall, D., Andrews, B., Van Loon, E., & Chapman, P. (2010). Commentary training improves responsiveness to hazards in a driving simulator. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 2117-2124. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.07.001
  9. Devos, H., Akinwuntan, A. E., Nieuwboer, A., Ringoot, I., Van Berghen, K., Tant, M., ... De Weerdt, W. (2010). Effect of simulator training on fitness-to-drive after stroke: A 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 24, 843-850. doi:10.1177/1545968310368687
  10. Devos, H., Akinwuntan, A. E., Nieuwboer, A., Tant, M., Truijen, S., De Wit, L., ... De Weerdt, W. (2009). Comparison of the effect of two driving retraining programs on on-road performance after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 699-705. doi:10.1177/1545968309334208
  11. Dobbs, A. R. (2013). Accuracy of the DriveABLE cognitive assessment to determine cognitive fitness to drive. Canadian Family Physician, 59(3), 156-161.
  12. DriveABLE Assessment Centres Inc. (2010). Reimbursement guide (USA). Retrieved from https://driveable.com/index.php/resources/reimbursement-guide-usa
  13. Fisk, G. D., Owsley, C., & Pulley, L. V. (1997). Driving after stroke: Driving exposure, advice, and evaluations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 1338-1345. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90307-5
  14. Galski, T., Ehle, H. T., McDonald, M. A., & Mackevich, J. (2000). Evaluating fitness to drive after cerebral injury: Basic issues and recommendations for medical and legal communities. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15, 895-908. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200006000-00004
  15. Han, S. W., Lee, J. S., Kim, S. K., Cha, T. H., Yoo, D. H., & Kim, H. (2018). The standardization of the Korean drivers 65 plus to identify driving fitness of senior drivers. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 26(1), 15-29. doi:10.14519/jksot.2018.26.1.02
  16. Jannink, M. J., Erren-Wolters, C. V., De Kort, A. C., & Van der Kooij, H. (2008). An electric scooter simulation program for training the driving skills of stroke patients with mobility problems: A pilot study. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 11, 751-754. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0271
  17. Klavora, P., Gaskovski, P., Heslegrave, R. J., Quinn, R. P., & Young, M. (1995). Rehabilitation of visual skills using the dynavision: A single case experimental study. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(1), 37-43. doi:10.1177/000841749506200107
  18. Kwakkel, G., Wagenaar, R. C., Kollen, B. J., & Lankhorst, G. J. (1996). Predicting disability in stroke-a critical review of the literature. Age and Ageing, 25, 479-489. doi:10.1093/ageing/25.6.479
  19. Kwon, Y. C., & Park, J. H. (1989). Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K). Part I: Development of the test for the elderly. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 28(1), 125-135.
  20. Lee, C. S., & Shin, S. C. (1993). Standardization of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in Korea. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 32, 950-961.
  21. Lundqvist, A., Gerdle, B., & Rönnberg, J. (2000). Neuropsychological aspects of driving after a stroke-in the simulator and on the road. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 135-150. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200003/04)14:2<135::AID-ACP628>3.0.CO;2-S
  22. Marshall, S. C., Molnar, F., Man-Son-Hing, M., Blair, R., Brosseau, L., Finestone, H. M., ... Wilson, K. G. (2007). Predictors of driving ability following stroke: A systematic review. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 14(1), 98-114. doi:10.1310/tsr1401-98
  23. Mazer, B. L., Sofer, S., Korner-Bitensky, N., Gelinas, I., Hanley, J., & Wood-Dauphinee, S. (2003). Effectiveness of a visual attention retraining program on the driving performance of clients with stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 541-550. doi:10.1053/ap mr.2003.50085
  24. Meyers, J. E., Volbrecht, M., & Kaster-Bundgaard, J. (1999). Driving is more than pedal pushing. Applied Neuropsychology, 6, 154-164. doi:10.1207/s15324826an0603_3
  25. Nouri, F. M., & Lincoln, N. B. (1993). Predicting driving performance after stroke. British Medical Journal, 307, 482-483. doi:10.1136/bmj.307.6902.482
  26. Oh, Y. J. (2014). Reliability and validity of DriveABLE Cognitive Assessment Tool for Korean (DCAT -K) (Master's thesis). Konyang University, Chungnam.
  27. Oh, Y. J., Song, Y. W., & Lee, J. S. (2015). The effect of driving simulator training to visual and physical response speed in patients of strokes: A single case study. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 23(4), 75-86. doi:10.14519/jksot.2015.23.4.06
  28. Park, M. G., Kim, C. B., Shin, H. K., & Son, J. W. (2015). A validation study of the Korean stroke drivers’ screening assessment (K-SDSA). Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 23(4), 87-102. doi:10.14519/jksot.2015.23.4.07
  29. Park, M. O. (2013). The relationship between basic perceptual-cognitive function and driving aptitude after a brain injury. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 21(1), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.14519/jksot.2013.21.4.07
  30. Quigley, F. L., & DeLisa, J. A. (1983). Assessing the driving potential of cerebral vascular accident patients. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37, 474-478. doi:10.5014/ajot.37.7.474
  31. Reitan, R. M. (1955). The relation of the trail making test to organic brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 19, 393-394. doi:10.1037/h0044509
  32. Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1985). The halstead-reitan neuropsychological test battery. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
  33. Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  34. Warren, M. (1993). A hierarchical model for evaluation and treatment of visual perceptual dysfunction in adult acquired brain injury, Part 1. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(1), 42-54. doi:10.5014/ajot.47.1.42