Journal of Technologic Dentistry (대한치과기공학회지)

Korean Academy of Dental Technology (대한치과기공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accuracy Verification of 3D printing model by Using Domestic Oral Scanner(eZIS)

국내산 구강스캐너(eZIS)를 사용한 3D프린트 모형의 정확도 검증 실험

  • Byun, Tae-hee (One Dental Laboratory LTD.) ;
  • Nam, Min-kyung (Dept. of Dental Laboratory Science, Catholic University of Pusan) ;
  • Kim, Jung-ho (Dept. of Dental Laboratory Science, Catholic University of Pusan) ;
  • Kim, Busob (Dept. of Dental Laboratory Science, Catholic University of Pusan)
  • 변태희 (원치과기공(주)) ;
  • 남민경 (부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 치기공학과) ;
  • 김정호 (부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 치기공학과) ;
  • 김부섭 (부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 치기공학과)
  • Received : 2018.07.24
  • Accepted : 2018.09.07
  • Published : 2018.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was establishing process of manufacturing dental prosthesis by using eZIS system(DDS Inc.,Korea). Methods: To evaluate accuracy verification, the test was practiced two ways. First, Comparison of 3D printing models and stone models was practiced by using 3D superimposing software. #36 prepared master model was scanned by eZIS system and three 'Veltz3D' 3D printing models and three 'Bio3D' 3D printing models were manufactured. three stone models were manufactured by conventional impression technique. Second, Fitness test was practiced. the 3D printing models and the stone models was compared by manufacturing same resin crown. #36 prepared master model was scanned 9 times and manufactured (milled) 9 resin crowns by eZIS system. These crowns were cemented three 'Veltz3D' 3D printing models, three 'Bio3D' 3D printing models and three stone models. These crowns were sliced mesiodistal axis and gaps were measured by digital microscope. Results: The average accuracy of Bio3D models were 65.75%. Veltz3D(Hebsiba) models were 60.11% Stone models were 41.00%. Conclusion : This study results showed 3D printing model is similar with stone model. So it was under clinical allow, didn't affect final dental prothesis. There were no significant differences in the appearance of the three types of milling crowns.

Keywords

References

  1. Bindle A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all ceramic CAD/CAM crown-coping on chamfer preparations. Oral Rehabil, 32, 441-7, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01446.x
  2. Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S. The Clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow-the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Invest, 17(9), 2119-2125, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0923-5
  3. Christoph V, Georg S, Kurt J, Bert M. Comparing the accuracy of master models based on digital intra-oral scanners with conventional plaster casts, Physics in Medicine. 1, 20-26, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phmed.2016.04.002
  4. Colpani JT. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater, 29(2), 174-180, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.012
  5. Farahnaz N. Clinical performance of CEREC AC Bluecam conservative ceramic restorations after five years-A retrospective study. J Dent, 43, 1076-1082, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.006
  6. Francisco MR. Evaluation of the absolute marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic copings. Prosthet Dental J, 105, 108-114, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60009-7
  7. Gordon JC. Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent, 16(2), 297-305, 1966. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(66)90082-5
  8. Jaber HA. Marginal Adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM Composite Crowns Using Two Different Finish Line Prepaaration Designs, J Prosthodont, 15(3), 155-163, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00095.x
  9. Keshvad A. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot- pressed techniques. Prosthodont J, 20, 535- 540, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00745.x
  10. Kim JH. Evaluation of Marginal Gap of Fixed Dental Prostheses Fabricated by Soft Metal Material Using Dental CAD/CAM. JKSDH, 14(3), 349-355, 2014.
  11. Kim JJ. CAD Technique trendfor Next generation. CAD& Graphics, 184, 122-125, 2009.
  12. Kim MI. An Analysis and Industrial Classification of Modeling and Simulation Service Industry. J of KAIS, 18(3), 185-198, 2017.
  13. Kim SK. CAD/CAM/CAE System Implementation Case Study in Korea, China and Japan. J of East and Central Asian Studies, 22(3), 79- 90, 2011.
  14. Kim WT. Evaluation of validity of polyurethane model fabricated by intra-oral scanning method. J Kor Acad Dent Tech, 36(2), 91- 96, 2014. https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2014.36.2.91
  15. Lee JW. Evaluation of marginal and internal gap under model-free monolithic zirconia restoration fabricated by digital intraoral scanner. J Kor Dent Pros, 54(3), 210-217, 2016.
  16. May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit: the procera Allceram crown. J Prosthet Dent, 80, 394-404, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70002-2
  17. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness an in vivo technique. Br Dent J, 131, 107-11, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  18. Mormann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. American Dental Association J, 137, 7-13, 2006.
  19. Mohammad AA, André VR, Ko CC, Ibrahim D. Accuracy evaluation of intraoral optical impressions: A clinical study using a reference appliance, J Prosthet Dent, 118(3), 400-405, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.022
  20. Park NY. A Comparison of the Marginal Fidelity of Open CAM System in relation to Change Scale. CUP J, 2011.
  21. Sarkis E. Microleakage study of CEREC III restorations. King Saud University, Dental Science J, 3, 49-53, 2012.
  22. Seo HW. Trend and Prospect of CAD/CAM Industry. J of SEPT, 2(28), 30-34, 1992.
  23. Shota F. Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners. J Prosthodont Res, 450-459, 2017.
  24. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch, Spikermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina- and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent, 26(74), 367, 2001.
  25. Yeo IS, Yang JH, Lee JB. In vitro marginal fit of Three all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent, 90(5), 459-64, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.005