DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

로지스틱 회귀모형을 활용한 방탄시험에서의 V50 산출방안

A Study on V50 Calculation in Bulletproof Test using Logistic Regression Model

  • 구승환 (국방기술품질원) ;
  • 노승민 (서울과학기술대학교 IT정책전문대학원) ;
  • 송승환 (국방기술품질원)
  • Gu, Seung Hwan (Defense Agency for Technology and Quality) ;
  • Noh, Seung Min (Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Graduate School of IT Policy) ;
  • Song, Seung Hwan (Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
  • 투고 : 2018.08.10
  • 심사 : 2018.09.19
  • 발행 : 2018.09.30

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to propose a solution to the case where $V_{50}$ calculation is impossible in the process of bulletproof test. Methods: In this study, we proposed a $V_{50}$ estimation method using logistic regression analysis. Six scenarios were applied by combining the homogeneity of the sample and the speed range. Then, 1,000 simulations were performed per scenario and six assumptions reflecting the reality were applied. Results: The result of the study, it was confirmed that there was no statistical difference between the $V_{50}$ value calculated by the conventional method and the $V_{50}$ value calculated by the improvement method. Therefore, in situations where $V_{50}$ can not be calculated, it is reasonable to use logistic regression analysis. Conclusion: This study develops a methodology that is easy to use and reliable by using statistical model based on actual data.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Army 3 Academy of Loyal University. 2014. Study on the application concept of bulletproof and mine protection and test evaluation.
  2. Choi. Y. D. 2005. "Bulletproof material and bulletproof test technology trend." Wonkwang Military Forum (1): 271-295.
  3. Gu. S. H., Kim. T. H., Song. S. H., Lee. J. H., and Park. S. W. 2016. "A Study on Advanced Measures of Ballistic Performance Test Method." Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Spring Conference:1157-1160.
  4. Johnson, T. H., Freeman, L., Hester, J., and Bell, J. L. 2014. "A comparison of ballistic resistance testing techniques in the Department of Defense." IEEE Access 2:1442-1455. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2377633
  5. Kim, J. H., and Jo, S. S. 2016. "Recursive Bayesian Filter based Strike Velocity Estimation for Small Caliber Projectile." Journal of the KIMST 19(2):177-184.
  6. Kim. J. H., and Shin. Y. H. 2017. "Ballisitic Limit Velocity Comparison for Warship Materials against AK-47 7.62mm MSC.", Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea 54(4):286-293. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2017.54.4.286
  7. Mauchant, D., Rice, K. D., Riley, M. A., Leber, D., Samarov, D., and Forster, A. L. 2011. "Analysis of three different regression models to estimate the ballistic performance of new and environmentally conditioned body armor." US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  8. National Institute of Justice. 2008. "Ballistic Resistance of Body Armor." NIJ Standard-0101.06. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC.
  9. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 2015. "Military Agency For Standardization. Ballistic Test Method For Personal Armour Materials And Combat Clothing." 2 edition. STANAG 2920.
  10. NATO STANAG 4569. 2014. "Procedures for Evaluating the Protection Levels of Logistic and Light Armoured Vehicles for KE and Artillery Threats." AEP-55, Volume 1.
  11. Riley, M. A., Rice, K. D., and Forster, A. L. 2012. "Assessment of Uncertainty in Ballistic Response Estimates Obtained from Ballistic Limit Testing." In Personal Armour Systems Symposium 2012.
  12. Tae. W. S., and Kim. G. I. 2013. "Failure Mechanism Analysis and Performance Change of Ballistic Resistance Material on Wet Condition." Journal of the KIMST 16(6):803-810.
  13. USATECOM. 1984. "Ballistic Tests of Armor Materials." TOP 2-2-710.
  14. US Department of Defense. 1997. DoD Test Method Standard "V50 Ballistic Test for Armor." MIL-STD-662F.
  15. Yoo, S. J., and Kim, J. Y. 2014. "A new method to estimate the striking velocity for small caliber projectiles." Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society 15(3):1288-1293. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.3.1288