Health Policy and Management (보건행정학회지)

Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management (한국보건행정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Organization Theory Perspective on the Structural Reform of the Health Care Delivery System

의료공급체계 구조의 개혁방향에 대한 조직이론적 시각

  • Han, Dal Sun (Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University)
  • 한달선 (한림대학교 의과대학 사회의학교실)
  • Received : 2018.08.16
  • Accepted : 2018.08.21
  • Published : 2018.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

There is a general consensus that many health care problems are attributable to the structural defects of the health care delivery system in Korea. The basic policy aimed to address these problems is to reform the delivery system so as that it incorporates two core principles: (1) stratification of medical care institutions into primary, secondary, and tertiary care providers according to the capability to perform specialized and complex services; (2) patients seeking care starting from the primary care provider and, if necessary, to be referred to the other provider step by step. This policy has been consistently pursued for about 30 years, but the achievement is far from success. Thus it is believed that the feasibility of the policy should be questioned. Starting from this question, based upon the observation of the current structure of the delivery system and its expected changes, the reform policy was discussed focusing on the assessment of its feasibility from both practical and theoretical viewpoints. The discussion leads to cast doubt on the policy for its possibility of making planned changes and producing expected desirable effects. Therefore it is advisable to investigate a wide range of alternative strategies and models for improving health care delivery.

Keywords

References

  1. Litwak E. Towards the theory and practice of coordination between formal organizations. In: Rosengren WR, Lefton M, editors. Organizations and clients. Columbus (OH): Charles E. Merill Publishing Co.; 1970. pp. 137-186.
  2. Hannan MT, Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. Am J Sociol 1977;82(5):929-964. https://doi.org/10.1086/226424
  3. Aldrich E. Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1979.
  4. Lee CS. Theoretical perspective on organizational environment. In: Lee CS, editor. Organization: structure and process. Seoul: Pakyoungsa; 2001. pp. 112-117.
  5. Han DS. An organizational perspective on the growth of health care delivery system: implications for reform. Health Policy Manag 2004;14(4): 21-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4332/kjhpa.2004.14.4.021.
  6. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, National Health Insurance Service. National health insurance statistical yearbook. Wonju: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service; 2016.
  7. Levine S, White PE. Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Adm Sci Q 1961;5(4):583-601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2390622.
  8. Litwak E, Hylton LF. Interorganizational analysis: a hypothesis on coordinating agencies. Adm Sci Q 1962;6(4):395-420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2390723.
  9. Thompson JD. Organizations in action: social science bases of administrative theory. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1967.
  10. Cho BR, Kim HS, Park JH, Shin DW, Kim KW, Kim SH, et al. Proposal of service provision model for chronic disease management centered on primary care. In: Cho BR, Kim HS, Park JH, Shin DW, Kim KW, Kim SH, et al. Development of Korean primary care service provision model for efficient and qualitative management of chronic diseases. Seoul: National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency; 2016. pp. 219-261.
  11. Lee KS. Community-based integrated service system. In: Lee KS, editor. Medical reform, who will do what? Seoul: Cheongnyeon-Uisa; 2017. pp. 89-122.
  12. Lim J, Lee KS, Kim SJ, Han JW, Shin YJ, Jeong W. Development and evaluation of referral-return model between medical institutions. Incheon: Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation of Gachon University; 2016.
  13. Fisher ES, Staiger DO, Bynum JP, Gottlieb DJ. Creating accountable care organizations: the extended hospital medical staff. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26(1):w44-w57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.w44.
  14. Rittenhouse DR, Shortell SM, Fisher ES. Primary care and accountable care: two essential elements of delivery-system reform. N Engl J Med 2009; 361(24):2301-2303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0909327.
  15. McClellan M, McKethan AN, Lewis JL, Roski J, Fisher ES. A national strategy to put accountable care into practice. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29(5):982-990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0194.
  16. Shortell SM, Gillies R, Wu F. United States innovations in healthcare delivery. Public Health Rev 2010;32(1):190-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03391598.
  17. Lee JC. Introduction and utilization of U.S. ACO and implications. Health Policy Forum [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Jul 20];12(2):72-77. Available from: http://webzine.rihp.re.kr/webzine_201411/a_09_01.html.
  18. Seo KH, Jung YM, Kim MJ, Lee SH. An evaluation of accountable care organization in USA and policy implications for Korean health care system. Health Policy Manag 2014;24(4):396-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4332/kjhpa.2014.24.4.396.
  19. Kim Y. Introduction plan of accountable care organization. In: Lee KS, editor. Medical reform, who will do what? Seoul: Cheongnyeon-Uisa; 2017. pp. 121-153.
  20. Kim BS, Park KG, Cho KH. Strategic selection theory, resource dependence theory, and network organization theory. In: Kim BS, Park KG, Cho KH, editors. Understanding and management of organization. Seoul: Daeyeong-Munhwasa; 2000. pp. 171-188.