Journal of Advanced Engineering and Technology (공학기술논문지)

Engineering Technology Institute of Chosun University (조선대학교 공학기술연구원)
권호 표지

Numerical Range Criteria for Classification of Value Engineering Proposals based on Value Improvement Types

VE제안의 가치향상 유형별 수치적 범위기준 제시

  • Nam, Keong-Woo (Department of Architectural Engineering, Jeju National University) ;
  • Jang, Myunghoun (Department of Architectural Engineering, Jeju National University)
  • 남경우 (제주대학교, 건축학부 건축공학전공) ;
  • 장명훈 (제주대학교, 건축학부 건축공학전공)
  • Received : 2018.10.20
  • Accepted : 2018.12.20
  • Published : 2018.12.31

⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Since its introduction in Korea, design VE has widely been used as a means to enhance values in the construction industry. However, a greater emphasis is still placed on cost reduction in approach attitudes and performance evaluations on the implementation of design VE. In this regard, this study presented a performance evaluation method for cost, function, and value of VE proposals. Numerical criteria on the increase and decrease of cost and function that can classify the value enhancement type of VE proposals were proposed based on the performance evaluation method. It is expected that the use of numerical criteria for the type classification of VE proposal, and cost and performance evaluation method proposed in this study will make it possible to conduct a clear and more intuitive evaluation of VE proposal. However, it is appropriate to use the numerical criteria as a guideline to apply the new performance evaluation method for VE proposals. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a statistical analysis with a wider range of users after the repeated application of the findings of this study, and thus to carry out research for presenting the numerical criteria for various types of users.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 제주대학교

References

  1. Kim, S., Lee, Y., Yang, J., Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 16(3), 3-10 (2015).
  2. Koo, S., Lim, S., Yoon, Y., Han, S., Hyun, C., Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 17(5), 3-12 (2016).
  3. Nam, K. W., Jang, M., Proceeding of Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 2018 May 16-18; Jeju, Korea, Seoul (Korea): Korea Institute of Building Construction, 74-75 (2018).
  4. Um, I. J., Hyun, C. T., In, C. S., Construction VE Expert-basic Course. Seoul (Korea): Korea Value Engineering Institute, 219 (2015).
  5. Lee, H. C., Hyun, C. T., Son, M. J., JI, S. M., Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 27(4), 113-120 (2011).
  6. Park, W. Y., Nam, K. W., Lee, S. H., Kim, J. H., Construction Engineering and Management, 13(5), 53-57 (2012).
  7. Dell'Isola, A. Value Engineering Practical Applications, Hoboken (NJ): Wiley, 464 (1997).
  8. Tukey, JW. Exploratory Data Analysis. London (UK): Pearson, 712 (1977).
  9. Kim, D. W., Yoon, S. H., Park, C. S., Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 30(9), 223-233 (2014).