DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Side lobe free medical ultrasonic imaging with application to assessing side lobe suppression filter

  • Jeong, Mok Kun (Department of Electronic Engineering, Daejin University) ;
  • Kwon, Sung Jae (Division of Human IT Convergence Engineering, Daejin University)
  • Received : 2018.02.08
  • Accepted : 2018.06.27
  • Published : 2018.11.30

Abstract

When focusing using an ultrasonic transducer array, a main lobe is formed in the focal region of an ultrasound field, but side lobes also arise around the focal region due to the leakage. Since the side lobes cannot be completely eliminated in the focusing process, they are responsible for subsequent ultrasound image quality degradation. To improve ultrasound image quality, a signal processing strategy to reduce side lobes is definitely in demand. To this end, quantitative determination of main and side lobes is necessary. We propose a theoretically and actually error-free method of exactly discriminating and separately computing the main lobe and side lobe parts in ultrasound image by computer simulation. We refer to images constructed using the main and side lobe signals as the main and side lobe images, respectively. Since the main and side lobe images exactly represent their main and side lobe components, respectively, they can be used to evaluate ultrasound image quality. Defining the average brightness of the main and side lobe images, the conventional to side lobe image ratio, and the main to side lobe image ratio as image quality metrics, we can evaluate image characteristics in speckle images. The proposed method is also applied in assessing the performance of side lobe suppression filtering. We show that the proposed method may greatly aid in the evaluation of medical ultrasonic images using computer simulations, albeit lacking the use of actual experimental data.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Daejin University

References

  1. Macovski A. Medical imaging systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1983.
  2. Jensen JA, Svendsen NB. Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1992;39(2):262-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/58.139123
  3. Holfort IK, Gran F, Jensen JA. Broadband minimum variance beamforming for ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009;56(2):314-25. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1040
  4. Kim K, Park S, Kim J, Park SB, Bae M. A fast minimum variance beamforming method using principal component analysis. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014;61(6):930-45. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2014.2989
  5. Seo CH, Yen JT. Sidelobe suppression in ultrasound imaging using dual apodization with cross-correlation. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2008;55(10):2198-210. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.919
  6. Wagner RF, Smith SW, Sandrik JM, Lopez H. Statistics of speckle in ultrasound B-scans. IEEE Trans Sonics Ultrason. 1983;30(3):156-63. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-SU.1983.31404
  7. Keitman-Curdes O, Brendel B, Marg C, Ermert H. Optimization of apodizations based on the sidelobe pressure energy in simulated ultrasound fields. In: Proceedings of IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Conference; 2003. p. 1677-80.
  8. Vignon F, Burcher MR. Capon beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging with focused beams. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2008;55(3):619-28. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2008.686
  9. Asl BM, Mahloojifar A. Minimum variance beamforming combined with adaptive coherence weighting applied to ultrasound medical imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009;56(9):1923-31. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1268
  10. Asl BM, Mahloojifar A. Eigenspace-based minimum variance beamforming applied to medical ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2010;57(11):2381-90. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1706
  11. Li PC, Li ML. Adaptive imaging using the generalized coherence factor. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2003;50(2):128-41. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2003.1182117
  12. Lediju MA, Trahey GE, Byram BC, Dahl JJ. Short-lag spatial coherence of backscattered echoes: imaging characteristics. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2011;58(7):1377-88. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2011.1957
  13. Jeong MK. A Fourier transform-based sidelobe suppression method in ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2000;47(3):759-63. https://doi.org/10.1109/58.842066
  14. Jeong MK, Kwon SJ. Estimation of side lobes in ultrasound imaging systems. Biomed Eng Lett. 2015;5(3):229-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-015-0194-y
  15. Jeong MK, Kwon SJ. A novel side lobe estimation method in medical ultrasound imaging systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Conference; 2015.
  16. Kwon SJ, Jeong MK. Estimation and suppression of side lobes in medical ultrasound imaging systems. Biomed Eng Lett. 2017;7(1):31-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-016-0002-3
  17. Synnevag JF, Austeng A, Holm S. Minimum variance adaptive beamforming applied to medical ultrasound imaging. In: Proceedings of IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Conference; 2005. p. 1199-202.
  18. Synnevag JF, Austeng A, Holm S. Adaptive beamforming applied to medical ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2007;54(8):1606-13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2007.431

Cited by

  1. Optically Transparent Focused Transducers for Combined Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Microscopy vol.40, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-020-00536-5
  2. A new method for assessing the performance of signal processing filters in suppressing the side lobe level vol.40, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.20032