Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Development of Frameworks for Outcomes Measurement of Reading Programs for Children in a Public Library

공공도서관 어린이 독서프로그램의 성과 측정을 위한 프레임워크 개발에 관한 연구

  • 박성재 (한성대학교 도서관정보문화트랙) ;
  • 한상우 (광주대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2018.08.27
  • Accepted : 2018.09.30
  • Published : 2018.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop frameworks for evaluating reading programs for children provided by a public library. Logic Model based on outcome evaluations was applied for the framework development. While the logic model is generally composed of six factors, the frameworks developed in this study has four factors including input, activity, output, and outcome. Additionally, this study suggests outcome indicators which were driven from library data. Even though the evaluation frameworks were developed from specific programs operated by a public library, those might be able to be used to evaluate other libraries' programs for children since the target programs are commonly provided by public libraries.

본 연구는 공공도서관에서 어린이를 대상으로 진행하는 독서프로그램의 성과를 측정하기 위한 프레임워크 개발을 목적으로 한다. 프레임워크 개발을 위한 이론적 토대로 성과 평가에 기반 한 로직모델을 적용하였다. 로직모델의 요소로 제안된 6개 요소 중에서 가정과 외부적 요인을 제외한 투입, 활동, 산출, 성과 요인을 중심으로 프로그램 평가 프레임워크를 개발하였다. 연구결과로, 서울 시내 한 공공도서관에서 연구기간 동안 진행된 4개의 프로그램에 대한 평가 프레임워크와 성과측정을 위한 지표를 제안하였다. 프로그램별로 다양한 성과지표의 개발이 가능하지만 본 연구에서는 도서관 데이터를 기반으로 측정 가능한 지표를 중심으로 제안하였다. 본 연구 결과가 사례 연구로 진행되었지만 대상 프로그램이 공공도서관에서 일반적으로 진행하는 프로그램이라는 점에서 타 도서관의 어린이 대상 프로그램의 평가 프레임워크로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Kwon, Nahyun (2015). A national study of perceived outcomes of public library services. Journal of the Korean Society for Library And Information Science, 49(2), 169-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.2.169
  2. Kim, Gyu-Hwan, & Nam, Young-Joon (2008). A study on development of performance indicators for Korean public libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(4), 113-139. https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2008.42.4.113
  3. Kim, Jeong-Taek (2009). A study on developing BSC-based public library performance indicator model. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(1), 47-71. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.1.200903.47
  4. Kim, HyoSuk, & Kim, HaeKyoung (2008). A study on the development of measuring instrument for the performance of public library. Proceeding of Korea Society for Information Management, 97-103.
  5. Park, Seong-Woo, & Chang, Woo-Kwon (2011). A study on the cause and effect of assessment index of intellectual capital and performance of the public library. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(4), 279-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.279
  6. Park, Sung-Jae, & Lee, Yonggu (2015). Measuring library outcomes using a logic model. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 26(2), 269-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.2.269
  7. Lee, Seog-Min (2011). A study on the application and use of program logic models. The Korean Governance Review, 18(1), 211-242. https://doi.org/10.17089/kgr.2011.18.1.009
  8. Lim, Yeojoo, & Chung, Yeon-Kyoung (2014). A study of identifying areas to measure the effectiveness of public library reading programs for children. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48(2), 89-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.2.089
  9. Ji, Eun-Gu (2012). The possibility of the using and limitations of logic model and BSC model for measuring performance in non-profit organizations. Korean Journal of Social Science, 31(1), 381-407. https://doi.org/10.18284/jss.2012.06.31.1.381
  10. Cha, Mi-Kyeong, & Pyo, Soon-Hee (2008). A study on the development of enjoyment indicators of public libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library And Information Science, 42(4), 329-354. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.4.329
  11. ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee (2012). 2012 Top ten trends in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries News, 73(6), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.73.6.8773