DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Operational Model for Open Access Based e-Journal Subscription of University Library

대학도서관의 오픈액세스 기반 전자저널 구독을 위한 운영모델 연구

  • 강정원 (명지대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 김현희 (명지대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2018.08.19
  • Accepted : 2018.09.05
  • Published : 2018.09.30

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the problems of existing e-journal subscriptions caused by open access of e-journals faced by university libraries. To solve these problems, we proposed an operational model for open access based subscription. The proposed operational model, which adapts the four concepts of subscription model, system, policy, and operation interpreted according to reality, applies open access on the premise of rational subscription of electronic journals. The proposed operational model was constructed based on national support, comprehensive operation, open access based model, and cooperation system. In particular, it emphasized the need for stable and continuous access to scholarly information through national support policy. The proposed operational model can be used as a basic data for the realization and research of open access in the domestic environment.

본 연구에서는 대학도서관이 직면하고 있는 전자저널의 오픈액세스로 인해 발생한 기존 전자저널 구독방식에 미치는 문제점들을 파악하고, 이를 해결할 수 있도록 오픈액세스 기반의 구독을 위한 운영모델을 제안하였다. 제안한 운영모델은 구독모델, 체계, 정책, 운영의 네 가지 개념을 현실에 맞게 해석한 모델로 전자저널의 합리적 구독을 전제로 하여 오픈액세스를 적용한 것이다. 국가지원, 통괄적 운영, 오픈액세스 기반 모델, 협력체계 구축을 주요 내용으로 하여 구현하였고 특히 국가지원체계로 안정적이고 지속적 학술정보 확보가 필요하다는 점을 강조하였다. 제안된 운영모델은 국내 오픈액세스 연구과 실현을 위한 기초 자료로 이용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, Jeongwon (2018). A study of alternative on DB price increase in domestic journals. The National Assembly Library, 2018(8), 24-29.
  2. Kang, Jeongwon (2018). A study on subscription model of OA-based electronic journals. Korean Library And Information Science Society Summer Conference, 43-58.
  3. Kwack, Dong-Chul, Joung, Hyun-Tae, & Kang, Jeongwon (2016). A study on improving overseas academic information collection and distribution system. Korean Council for University Education.
  4. Kim, Gyuhwan (2014). A proposal for the acceptance and processes of open access in Korean societies. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(3), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2014.31.3.111
  5. Kim, Gyuhwan (2016). An OA policy study on research outcomes funded by public institutions. KLISS 2016 Proceedings of Korean Library and Information Science Society, No.2, 337-353.
  6. Kim, Gyuhwan, & Joung, Kyoung Hee (2017). A study on the characteristics of open access in Korean scholarly journals: focused on KCI journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(3), 251-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.3.251
  7. Shin, Eun-Ja (2014). A study on APC subsidy policies to encourage OA publishing. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(3), 249-270. https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2014.31.3.249
  8. Joung, Kyoung-Hee (2011). Characteristics of open access journals in Korea: focused on KCI journals. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 22(3), 373-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2011.22.3.373
  9. Joung, Kyoung Hee (2012). A study on the roles of academic libraries for open access journal publishing: focusing on the academic libraries participated in COPE. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 23(4), 45-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2012.23.4.045
  10. Cha, Mikyeong, Song, Kyeong-Jin, & Kim, Na-Young (2017). A study on improving laws and regulations for open access of research papers from national research and development projects. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 51(1), 147-174. https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2017.51.1.147
  11. KERIS (2017). A study on evaluation and negotiation of KERIS electronic information consortium in 2017(III). The Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  12. Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 372-382. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.65.5.372
  13. Craig, I., Plume, A., McVeigh, M., Pringle, J., & Amin, M. (2007). Do open access articles have greater citation impact?: a critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.04.001
  14. Gargour, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., & Harnad, S. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013636
  15. Gaule, P., & Maystre, N. (2011). Getting cited: does open access help? Research Policy, 40(10), 1332-1338. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1427763
  16. KE Report (2017). A landscape study on open access and monographs. The Knowledge Exchange. Retrieved from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6693/5/Knowledge_Exchange_summary_-_landscape_study_on_OA_and_Monographs_revised_July_2018.pdf
  17. KE Report (2017). Financial and administrative issues around article publication costs for open access. The Knowledge Exchange. Retrieved from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6665/1/Financial_and_administrative_issues_around_APCs_for_OA_June_2017_KE.pdf
  18. KE Report (2017). Knowledge exchange approach towards open scholarship. The Knowledge Exchange. Retrieved from https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6685/1/KE_APPROACH_TOWARDS_OPEN_SCHOLARSHIP_AUG_2017.pdf
  19. Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018), The state of open access: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ, 6:e4375 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
  20. STM report (2015). International association of scientific, technical and medical publishers (4th ed.). Retrieved from https://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf
  21. 대학알리미. Retrieved from http://www.academyinfo.go.kr/
  22. 학술정보통계시스템. Retrieved from http://www.rinfo.kr/
  23. 한국과학기술기획평가원. Retrieved from https://www.kistep.re.kr/
  24. Open Science. EC. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/open-science-open-access
  25. Open Science. OECE. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/media/oecdorg/satellitesites/stie-outlook/files/policyprofile/STI%20Outlook%2012_%20PP%20Interactions_OpenScience.pdf
  26. UK Government Web Archive. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/*/http:/www.rcuk.ac.uk/