한국재난정보학회 논문집 (Journal of the Society of Disaster Information)

  • 제14권3호
  • /
  • Pages.305-314
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1976-2208(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-5287(eISSN)
한국재난정보학회 (The Korean Society of Disaster Information)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

동치환공법의 적정심도 결정에 관한 연구

LandAnalysis of Effective Depth of Dynamic Replacement Method

  • Kim, Sung-Hwan (Dept. of Civil and Environmetal Eng., Incheon National Univ)
  • 투고 : 2018.08.16
  • 심사 : 2018.09.06
  • 발행 : 2018.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구목적: 동치환공법은 유사한 동다짐공법에 비해 동치환 직경, 심도, 간격, 타격에너지(중추 무게와 낙하고), 지반강도 증대 효과, 지반 개량효율 등에 대한 연구 및 실증이 부족하다. 연구방법: 본 연구에서는 실트질 점토지반을 연구 대상 지반으로 선정하여 예비 동치환시공과 본시공 동치환의 2가지 경우로 나눠서 지반개량을 실시하고 효과를 분석하였으며, 결과를 바탕으로 적정 개량심도 결정 및 개량효과에 미치는 인자에 관하여 연구하였다. 연구결과: 실트질 점토 지반을 대상으로 동치환 적정 심도 결정, 지반개량효과에 끼치는 특성을 상세히 분석하여 동치환 시 적용할 수 있는 개량심도 ($D_R$) 관계식을 제안하였다. 결론: 동치환공법을 실트질 점토 지반에 적용한 경우, 동다짐공법의 낙하에너지보다 1.25~2.5배 증가시켜야 하는 것으로 나타났다.

Purpose: Dynamic Replacement Method currently lacks of sufficient research, implementation cases, and case histories, compared with other comparable methods, such as Dynamic Compaction Method. Method: In this study, for Dynamic Replacement Method, the effective improvement depth and improved strength were analyzed for silty clayey soils. Results: Testbed test was performed to verify the effectiveness of Dynamic Replacement Method followed by the main dynamic replacement implementation on real construction site. Conclusion: A The effects of changes of soft ground depth, dynamic replacements' diameter, depth, spacing, and applied energy on dynamic replacement efficiency in silty clays were assessed and the followings were found: Empirical coefficient for soil $n_R$ of Dynamic Replacement Method was within the range of 0.14~0.32 and its ${\sqrt{WH}}$ is recommended to be 1.25~2.5 times of those from Dynamic Compaction Method.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Gambin, M. P.(1979), "Menard Dynamic Consolidation", presented at ASCE Seminar on Ground Reinforcement, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., Jan.
  2. Mayne, P. W., Jones, J. S.(1983), "Impact Stress during Dynamic Compaction", Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 10, Oct., 1983, pp.1342-1347. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:10(1342)
  3. Mayne, P. W., Jones, J. S. and Dumas, J. C.(1984), "Ground Response to Dynamic Compaction", Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol.110, No.6, pp.757-774. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:6(757)
  4. Qian, J. H.(1986), "Dynamic Consolidation from Practice to Theory", 8th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp.213-217.
  5. Chow, Y. K., Lee, S. L.(1994), "Dynamic Compaction of Loose Granular Soils: Effect of Print Spacing", Jounal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol.120, GT.7, pp.1115-1133. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:7(1115)
  6. Menard, L., Broise, Y.(1975), "Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Dynamic Consolidation", Geotechnique 25. No.1, pp.3-18. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1975.25.1.3
  7. Federal Highway Administration.(1995), "Dynamic Compaction", Geotechnical Engineering Circular No.1, pp.27-38.
  8. Bowles, J. E.(1988), Foundation Analysis and Design, McGraw-Hill, 4th edition.