DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sequential patient recruitment monitoring in multi-center clinical trials

  • Kim, Dong-Yun (National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute / National Institutes of Health) ;
  • Han, Sung-Min (Open Source Electronic Health Record Alliance (OSEHRA)) ;
  • Youngblood, Marston Jr. (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
  • Received : 2018.03.02
  • Accepted : 2018.08.17
  • Published : 2018.09.30

Abstract

We propose Sequential Patient Recruitment Monitoring (SPRM), a new monitoring procedure for patient recruitment in a clinical trial. Based on the sequential probability ratio test using improved stopping boundaries by Woodroofe, the method allows for continuous monitoring of the rate of enrollment. It gives an early warning when the recruitment is unlikely to achieve the target enrollment. The packet data approach combined with the Central Limit Theorem makes the method robust to the distribution of the recruitment entry pattern. A straightforward application of the counting process framework can be used to estimate the probability to achieve the target enrollment under the assumption that the current trend continues. The required extension of the recruitment period can also be derived for a given confidence level. SPRM is a new, continuous patient recruitment monitoring tool that provides an opportunity for corrective action in a timely manner. It is suitable for the modern, centralized data management environment and requires minimal effort to maintain. We illustrate this method using real data from two well-known, multicenter, phase III clinical trials.

Keywords

References

  1. Anisimov VV (2016). Discussion on the paper "Real-time prediction of clinical trial enrollment and event counts: a review" by DF Heitjan, Z Ge, and GS Ying, Contemporary Clinical Trials, 46, 7-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.11.008
  2. Anisimov VV and Fedorov VV (2007). Modelling, prediction, and adaptive adjustment of recruitment in multicentre trials, Statistics in Medicine, 26, 4958-4975. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2956
  3. Berkman LF, Blumenthal J, Burg M, et al. (2003). Effects of treating depression and low perceived social support on clinical events after myocardial infarction: the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD) Randomized Trial, Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 3106-3116. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.23.3106
  4. Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial (BHAT) https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/studies/bhat/?q=bhat (accessed 17 January 2017).
  5. Byington RP (1984). Beta-blocker heart attack trial: design, method, and baseline results, Controlled Clinical Trial, 5, 382-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-2456(84)80017-3
  6. Carlisle B, Kimmelman J, Ramsay T, and MacKinnon N (2015). Unsuccessful trial accrual and human subjects protections: an empirical analysis of recently closed trials, Clinical Trials, 12, 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774514558307
  7. Carter RE (2004). Application of stochastic processes to participant recruitment in clinical trials, Controlled Clinical Trials, 25, 429-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2004.07.002
  8. Corregano L, Bastert K, Correa da Rosa J, and Kost RG (2015). Accrual index: a real - time measure of the timeliness of clinical study enrollment, Clinical and Translational Science, 8, 655-661. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12352
  9. ENRICHD protocol version 7.0. https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/static/studies/enrichd/Protocol.pdf (accessed 16 January 2017).
  10. Gajewski BJ, Simon SD, and Carlson SE (2008). Predicting accrual in clinical trials with Bayesian posterior predictive distributions, Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2328-2340. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3128
  11. Haidich A and Ioannidis JP (2001). Patterns of patient enrollment in randomized controlled trials, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 877-883. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00353-5
  12. Heitjan DF, Ge Z, and Ying GS (2015). Real-time prediction of clinical trial enrollment and event counts: a review, Contemporary Clinical Trials, 45, 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.07.010
  13. Lorden G (1977). Nearly-optimal sequential tests for finitely many parameter values, The Annals of Statistics, 5, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176343737
  14. Rengerink KO (2014). Embedding trials in evidence-based clinical practice (PhD thesis), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
  15. Rojavin MA (2005). Recruitment index as a measure of patient recruitment activity in clinical trials, Contemporary Clinical Trials, 26, 552-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2005.05.001
  16. Scoggins JF and Ramsey SD (2010). A national cancer clinical trial system for the 21st century: reinvigorating the NCI cooperative group program, Journal of National Cancer Institute, 102, 1371.
  17. Siegmund D (1975). Error probabilities and average sample number of the sequential probability ratio test, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 37, 394-401.
  18. Taylor HM and Karlin S (1998). An Introduction to Stochastic Modeling (3rd ed), Academic Press, San Diego.
  19. van der Wouden JC, Blankenstein AH, Huibers MJ, van der Windt DA, Stalman WA, and Verhagen AP (2007). Survey among 78 studies showed that Lasagna's law holds in Dutch primary care research, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 819-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.010
  20. Wald A (1947). Sequential Analysis, John Wiley, New York.
  21. Woodroofe M (1982). Non linear renewal theory in sequential analysis, CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
  22. Zhang Q and Lai D (2011). Fractional Brownian motion and long term clinical trial recruitment, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 141, 1783-1788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2010.11.028
  23. Zhang X and Long Q (2010). Stochastic modeling and prediction for accrual in clinical trials, Statistics in Medicine, 29, 649-658.
  24. Zhang X and Long Q (2012). Modeling and prediction of subject accrual and event times in clinical trials: a systematic review, Clinical Trials, 9, 681-688. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774512447996