DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Design of a Mixed-Spectrum Reactor With Improved Proliferation Resistance for Long-Lived Applications

  • Received : 2018.03.27
  • Accepted : 2018.08.27
  • Published : 2018.09.30

Abstract

Long-lived Small Modular Reactors are being promoted as an innovative way of catering to emerging markets and isolated regions. They can be operated continuously for decades without requiring additional fuel. A novel configuration of long-lived reactor core employs a mixed neutron spectrum, providing an improvement in nonproliferation metrics and in safety characteristics. Starting with a base sodium reactor design, moderating material is inserted in outer core assemblies to modify the fast spectrum. The assemblies are shuffled once during core lifetime to ensure that every fuel rod is exposed to the thermalized spectrum. The Mixed Spectrum Reactor is able to maintain a core lifetime over two decades while ensuring the plutonium it breeds is below the weapon-grade limit at the fuel discharge. The main drawbacks of the design are higher front-end fuel cycle costs and a 58% increase in core volume, although it is alleviated to some extent by a 48% higher power output.

Keywords

References

  1. F. C. Smith, W. G. Halsey, N. W. Brown, J. J. Sienicki, A. Moisseytev, and D. C. Wade, "SSTAR: The US leadcooled fast reactor (LFR)," Journal of Nuclear Materials, 376(3), 255-259 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.02.049
  2. A. Glaser, L. B. Hopkins, and M. V. Ramana, "Resource Requirements and Proliferation Risks Associated with Small Modular Reactors," Nuclear Technology, 184(1), 121-129 (2013). https://doi.org/10.13182/NT13-A19873
  3. R. Avery, Coupled Fast-thermal Power Breeder Reactor. US Patent 2,992,982, 18 July 1961.
  4. G. J. Fischer and R. J. Cerbone, The Fast-Mixed Spectrum Reactor Interim Report - Initial Feasibility Study, Brookhaven National Laboratory Report, BNL-50976 (1979).
  5. B. Atefi, An Evaluation of the Breed/Burn Fast Reactor Concept, MIT, PhD Thesis, Cambridge (1979).
  6. N. E. Stauff, M. J. Driscoll, B. Forget, and P. Hejzlar, "Resolution of proliferation issues for a sodium fast reactor blanket," Nuclear Technology, 170(3), 371-382 (2010). https://doi.org/10.13182/NT10-1
  7. J. Tsujimoto, T. Iwasaki, N. Hirakawa, T. Osugi, S. Okajima, and M. Andoh, "Improvement of reactivity coefficients of metallic fuel LMFBR by adding moderating material," Annals of Nuclear Energy, 28(9), 831-855 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4549(00)00094-3
  8. D. Petti, D. Hill, J. Gehin, H. Gougar, G. Strydom, T. O'Connor, F. Heidet, J. Kinsey, C. Grandy, A. Qualls, N. Brown, J. Powers, E. Hoffman, and D. Croson, "A Summary of the Department of Energy's Advanced Demonstration and Test Reactor Options Study," Nuclear Technology, 199(2), 111-128 (2017).
  9. T. K. Kim, C. Grandy, and R. N. Hill, "A 100 MWe advanced sodium-cooled fast reactor core concept," Proc. of PHYSOR, Knoxville, TN (2012).
  10. J. T. Goorley, M. R. James, T. E. Booth, F. B. Brown, and J. S. Bull et al., Initial MCNP6 Release Overview - MCNP6 version 1.0, Los Alamus National Laboratory Report, LA-UR-13-22934 (2013).
  11. A. Abou Jaoude, A. Erickson, and N. Stauff, "Design Evaluation of a Mixed-Spectrum Long-Lived Reactor Core," Proc. of PHYSOR, Cancun, Mexico (2018).
  12. Y. I. Chang, P. J. Finck, and C. Grandy, Advanced Burner Test Reactor Preconceptual Design Report, Argonne National Laboratory Report , ANL-AFCI-173 (2006).
  13. R. Wigeland, T. Taiwo, H. Ludewig, M. Todosow, W. Halsey, J. Gehin, R. Jubin, J. Buelt, S. Stockinger, and K. Jenni, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Evaluation and Screening - Final Report, Idaho National Laboratory Report, INL/EXT-14-31465 (2014).