Stock Market Sentiment and Stock Returns

  • Kim, Taehyuk (Department of Business Administration, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ryu, Hoyoung (Department of Business Administration, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2018.11.20
  • Accepted : 2018.12.20
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

The behavioral finance view on the existence of asset pricing anomalies is based on two factors: investors' sentiment and limits to arbitrage. This paper tries to examine the effect of investors' sentiment on the stock price in the Korean stock market. In order to measure investors' sentiment, we constructed the sentiment index using principal component of five sentiment variables. By using sentiment index as an additional independent variable to three risk factors, impacts of the sentiment index on individual stocks and 25 portfolios sorted by BM-size are examined. Main results found are as follows: 1) not only all three risk factors show positive impacts on the return of individual stock, but also the sentiment index has a positive impact. SI alone explains 15% of individual return variation. 2) among four independent variables, the most important factor turned out to be the market risk factor and investors' sentiment has better explanatory power on stock price than the size effect. 3) after controlling the market risk factor, the coefficient of the sentiment index for the smallest size and highest book/market value portfolios is significantly positive. 4) all the coefficients of the sentiment index for 25 portfolios sorted by BM-size have significant positive value after controlling size or (and) value.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Pusan National University

References

  1. Baker, M., Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns, Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645-1680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00885.x
  2. Benveniste, M., Ljungqvist, A., Wilhelm, W., Yu, X. (2003). Evidence of information spillovers in the production of investment banking services, Journal of Finance, 58(2), 577-608. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00538
  3. Brown, W., Cliff, M. (2005). Investor sentiment and asset valuation, Journal of Business, 78(2), 405-440. https://doi.org/10.1086/427633
  4. Campbell, Y., Kyle, S. (1993). Smart money, noise trading, and stock price behavior, Review of Economic Studies, 60(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297810
  5. De Long, D., Shleifer, A., Summers, H., Waldman, J. (1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets, Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), 703-738. https://doi.org/10.1086/261703
  6. Fama, E. F., French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds, Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
  7. Fama, E. F., French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model, Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010
  8. Fisher, K., Statman, M. (2000). Investor sentiment and stock returns, Financial Analysts Journal, 56(2), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v56.n2.2340
  9. Ibbotson, R., Jaffe, J. (1975). 'Hot issue' markets, Journal of Finance, 30(4), 1027-1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1975.tb01019.x
  10. Jacobs, H. (2015). What explains the dynamics of 100 anomalies, Journal of Banking and Finance, 57(1), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.03.006
  11. Jung, D. S., Kim, T. H. (2014). The information effects of VKOSPI on KOSPI200 intraday jumps, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 16(4B), 2011-2020. (in Korean).
  12. Kim, T. H. (2012). Impacts of implied volatility and volatility skew on KOSPI200 jump, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 14(6), 2897-2910.
  13. Kim, T. H. (2018). The effect of arbitrage constraints on stock returns, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 20(5), 2237-2247.
  14. Kim, T. H., Jung, D. S. (2016). The information effects of the KOSPI200 options implied volatility across moneyness, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 18(1B), 339-351. (in Korean).
  15. Kim, W. H., Ryu, H. Y., Kim, T. H. (2017). The impact of investor sentiment on KOSPI futures returns, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 19(4B), 1929-1942.
  16. Kumar, A., Lee, C. M. C. (2006). Retail investor sentiment and return comovements, Journal of Finance, 61(5), 2451-2486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01063.x
  17. Lintner, J. (1965). Security prices, risk, and maximal gains from diversification, Journal of Finance, 20(4), 587-615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1965.tb02930.x
  18. Lowry, M., Schwert, W. (2002). IPO market cycles: bubbles or sequential learning?, Journal of Finance, 57(3), 1171-1200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00458
  19. Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a capital asset market, Econometrica, 34(4), 768-783. https://doi.org/10.2307/1910098
  20. Sharpe, W. (1964). Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk, Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x
  21. Shleifer, A., Summers, L. (1990). The noise trader approach in finance, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(2), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.4.2.19