DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Forest income and inequality in Kampong Thom province, Cambodia: Gini decomposition analysis

  • Nhem, Sareth (Department of Forest Resources, Kongju National University) ;
  • Lee, Young Jin (Department of Forest Resources, Kongju National University) ;
  • Phin, Sopheap (Prek Leap National College of Agriculture)
  • Received : 2018.06.06
  • Accepted : 2018.09.04
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

This study analyzed the distribution of forest income and other variable sources of rural household income and considered their importance for the reduction of income inequality and poverty. We employed Gini decomposition to measure the contribution of forest income and other sources of income to income equality and assess whether they were inequality-increasing or inequality-decreasing in the 14 villages. The forest income Gini correlation with total income was very high, $R_k=0.6960$, and the forest income share of total rural household income was 35% ($S_k=0.3570$). If the income earned from forest activities was removed, the Gini index would increase by 10.3%. Thus, if people could not access forest resources because of vast deforestation, perhaps from the limitations of government-managed forestry, unplanned clearing of forest land for agriculture or the granting of ELCs, there would be an increase in income inequality and poverty among rural households. The findings suggest that policy makers should look beyond agriculture for rural development, as forest resources provide meaningful subsistence income and perhaps contribute to both preventing and reducing poverty and inequality in rural communities. The study found that non-farm activities were inequality-increasing sources of income. The share of non-farm income to the total rural household income was $S_k=0.1290$ and the Gini index of non-farm income was very high, $G_k=0.8780$, compared with forest and farm income. This disagrees with other studies which have reported that non-farm income was inequality-decreasing for the rural poor.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Korea Forest Service (Korea Forestry Promotion Institute)

References

  1. Adams RH. 1994. Non-farm income and inequality in rural Pakistan: a decomposition analysis. J Dev Stud. 31(1): 110-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389408422350
  2. ADB. 2015. Promoting women's economic empowerment in Cambodia. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank (ADB).
  3. Agarwal, B. 2009. Rule making in community forestry institutions: the difference women make. Ecol Econ. 68(8-9): 2296-2308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.017
  4. Ali A, Rahut DB. 2018. Forest-based livelihoods, income, and poverty: empirical evidence from the Himalayan region of rural Pakistan. J Rural Stud. 57:44-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.10.001
  5. Allison PD. 1978. Measures of inequality. Am Sociol Rev. 43(6): 865-880. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094626
  6. Angelsen A, Jagger P, Babigumira R, Belcher B, Hogarth NJ, Bauch S, Borner J, Smith-Hall C, Wunder S. 2014. Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. World Dev. 64(S1):S12-S28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.006
  7. Arnold JEM. 1991. Community forestry: ten years in review. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
  8. Babulo B, Muys B, Nega F, Tollens E, Nyssen J, Deckers J, Mathijs E. 2009. The economic contribution of forest resource use to rural livelihoods in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Forest Policy Econ. 11(2):123-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.007
  9. Bakkegaard RK, Agrawal A, Animon I, Hogarth N, Miller D, Persha L, Rametsteiner E, Wunder S and Zezza A. 2016. National socioeconomic surveys in forestry: Guidance and survey modules for measuring the multiple roles of forests in households welfare and livelihoods. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
  10. Bellu LG, Liberati P. 2006. Theil index and entropy class indexes describing income inequality theil index and entropy class indexes. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): 20. Rome, Italy. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/docs/up/easypol/445/theil_index_051en.pdf.
  11. Boyce JK, Zwickl K, Ash M. 2016. Measuring environmental inequality. Ecol Econ. 124:114-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.014
  12. Bredin YK, Lindhjem H, van Dijk J, Linnell JDC. 2015. Mapping value plurality towards ecosystem services in the case of Norwegian wildlife management: a Q analysis. Ecol Econ. 118:198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.005
  13. Bretschger L, Meulemann M, Stunzi A. 2018. Climate Policy Based on the Paris Agreement. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Elsevier Inc.
  14. Bukoski JJ, Drazen E, Johnson WR, Swamy L. 2018. Tropical forests for sustainable development: shaping the 2030 agenda for sustainable development with knowledge from the field. J Sustainable Forestry. 37(2):77-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2018.1418255
  15. Camacho LD, Camacho SC. 2006. Economic implications of reforestation as a forest restoration strategy under the community-based forest management program in Quirino province, Philippines. Forest Sci Technol. 2(1):27-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2006.9656296
  16. Ceriani L, Verme P. 2012. The origins of the Gini index: extracts from Variabilita e Mutabilita (1912) by Corrado Gini. J Econ Inequality. 10(3):421-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-011-9188-x
  17. Cullis J, Koppen Bv. 2007. Applying the Gini coefficient to measure inequality of water use in the Olifants river water management area, South Africa. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute.
  18. Dai C, Qin XS, Chen Y, Guo HC. 2018. Dealing with equality and benefit for water allocation in a lake watershed: a Ginicoefficient based stochastic optimization approach. J Hydrol. 561(September 2017):322-334.
  19. Devkota RR. 2010. Interests and power as drivers of community forestry: a case study of Nepal. Gottingen, Germany: Universitatsverlag Gottingen.
  20. Doss C, Meinzen-Dick R, Quisumbing A, Theis S. 2018. Women in agriculture: four myths. Global Food Security. 16:69-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.10.001
  21. Ehara M, Hyakumura K, Nomura H, Matsuura T, Sokh H, Leng C. 2016. Identifying characteristics of households affected by deforestation in their fuelwood and non-timber forest product collections: Case study in Kampong Thom Province, Cambodia. Land Use Policy. 52:92-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.006
  22. Evans K, Flores S, Larson AM, Marchena R, Muller P, Pikitle A. 2017. Challenges for women's participation in communal forests: experience from Nicaragua's in digenous territories. Women's Stud Int Forum. 65:37-46.
  23. FA. 2015. Community forestry statistics in Cambodia 2015. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Forestry Administration (FA).
  24. FAO. 2016. State of the World's forests in brief: forests and agriculture: land-use challenges and opportunities. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
  25. FAO. 2018. The state of the Worlds forests - forest pathways to sustainable development. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
  26. Favero G. 2017. A reciprocal legitimation: Corrado Gini and statistics in fascist Italy A reciprocal legitimation: Corrado Gini and statistics in fascist Italy. Manage Organizational History. 9359:1-24.
  27. Flower BCR. 2018. Does informal tenure result in land inequality? A critique of tenure formalisation reforms in Cambodia. Land Use Policy. 77(April):240-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.032
  28. Fonta WM, Ayuk ET. 2013. Measuring the role of forest income in mitigating poverty and inequality: Evidence from South-Eastern Nigeria. Forests Trees and Livelihoods. 22(2):86-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2013.785783
  29. Gatiso TT, Wossen T. 2015. Forest dependence and income inequality in rural Ethiopia: evidence from Chilimo-Gaji community forest users. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 22(1): 14-24.
  30. Haughton J, Khandker SR. 2009. Handbook on poverty+inequality. Washington, D.C.: United States: The World Bank.
  31. Ireson C. 1991. Women's forest work in Laos. Soc Nat Res. 4(1): 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929109380740
  32. Jagger P. 2012. Environmental income, rural livelihoods, and income inequality in Western Uganda. Forests Trees and Livelihoods. 21(2):70-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2012.698846
  33. Jagger P, Luckert MMK, Duchelle AE, Lund JF, Sunderlin WD. 2014. Tenure and forest income: observations from a global study on forests and poverty. World Dev. 64(S1):S43-S55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.004
  34. Jiao X, Smith-Hall C, Theilade I. 2015. Rural household incomes and land grabbing in Cambodia. Land Use Policy. 48: 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.008
  35. Kakwani NC. 1980. Income inequality and poverty. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.
  36. Keenan RJ, Reams GA, Achard F, de Freitas JV, Grainger A, Lindquist E. 2015. Dynamics of global forest area: results from the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. Forest Ecol Manage. 352(2015):9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.014
  37. Khundi F, Jagger P, Shively G, Sserunkuuma D. 2011. Income, poverty and charcoal production in Uganda. Forest Pol Econ. 13(3):199-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.11.002
  38. Kim SB, Alounsavath O. 2015. Forest policy measures influence on the increase of forest cover in northern Laos. Forest Sci Technol. 11(3):166-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2014.977358
  39. Kohler U, Kreuter F. 2012. Data analysis using Stata. 3rd ed. Texas, United States of America: StataCorp LP.
  40. Krott M. 2005. Forest policy analysis. Gottingen, Germany: Springer Netherlands.
  41. Lerman R. 1985. Income inequality effects by income source: a new approach and applications to the United States. Rev Econ Stat. 67(1):151-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928447
  42. Liao TF. 2016. Evaluating distributional differences in income inequality. Socius: Sociological Res Dynamic World. 2(2): 1-14.
  43. MacDicken KG, Sola P, Hall JE, Sabogal C, Tadoum M, de Wasseige C. 2015. Global progress toward sustainable forest management. Forest Ecol Manage. 352:47-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.005
  44. MAFF. 2010. National Forest Programme 2010-2029. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF).
  45. Makoudjou A, Levang P, Chupezi Tieguhong J. 2017. The role of forest resources in income inequality in Cameroon. Forests Trees and Livelihoods. 8028(March):1-15.
  46. Manandhar TD, Shin MY. 2013. How community-based forest management can improve rural livelihoods: a case of Kabhre district, Nepal. Forest Sci Technol. 9(3):131-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2013.801170
  47. Martins NO. 2015. Inequality, sustainability and Piketty's capital. Ecol Econ. 118:287-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.021
  48. Miah MD, Akther S, Shin MY, Koike M. 2014. Scaling up REDD+strategies in Bangladesh: a forest dependence study in the Chittagong Hill Tracts. Forest Sci Technol. 10(3): 148-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2014.889045
  49. MoE. 2018. Cambodia forest cover 2016. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: The Ministry of Environment (MoE).
  50. MoLVT. 2014. Policy on labour migration for Cambodia. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training (MoLVT).
  51. MoP. 2013. Cambodia Inter-Censal Population Survey 2013: Final Report. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Ministry of Planning (MoP).
  52. MoWA. 2014. Neary rattanak IV: five year strategic plan for gender equality and women's employment. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Ministry of Women's Affairs (MoWA).
  53. Nasar A, Abdullah M, Stacey N, Garnett ST, Myers B. 2016. Forest Policy and Economics Economic dependence on mangrove forest resources for livelihoods in the Sundarbans, Bangladesh. Forest Pol Econ. 64:15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.12.009
  54. Nguyen TT, Do TL, Parvathi P, Wossink A, Grote U. 2018. Farm production efficiency and natural forest extraction: evidence from Cambodia. Land Use Policy. 71(November): 480-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.016
  55. Nguyen TV, Tran TQ. 2018. Forestland and rural household livelihoods in the North Central Provinces, Vietnam. Land Use Policy. 79(March):10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.046
  56. Nhem S, Lee YJ, Phin S. 2017. Sustainable management of forest in view of media attention to REDD+policy, opportunity and impact in Cambodia. Forest Pol Econ. 85(August):10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.011
  57. Nhem S, Lee YJ, Phin S. 2018. The impact of forest resource decline: analyzing forest-related income supplements to reduce income inequality and poverty of the Kouy indigenous people living in Kampong Thom province, Cambodia. J Sustainable Forestry. 37(2):97-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2017.1369887
  58. Nieto J, Carpintero O, Miguel LJ. 2018. Less than $2^{\circ}C$? An economic-environmental evaluation of the Paris agreement. Ecol Econ. 146(July 2017):69-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.007
  59. Nilsson M, Persson A. 2017. Policy note: lessons from environmental policy integration for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. Environ Sci Pol. 78(July):36-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.09.003
  60. Pandit R. 2018. Forest Policy and Economics REDD+adoption and factors affecting respondents' knowledge of REDD+goal: evidence from household survey of forest users from REDD+piloting sites in Nepal. Forest Pol Econ. (February 2017):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.02.002.
  61. Park MS, Choi ES, Youn Y-C. 2013. REDD+as an international cooperation strategy under the global climate change regime. Forest Sci Technol. 9(4):213-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2013.846875
  62. Rahut DB, Behera B, Ali A. 2016. Do forest resources help increase rural household income and alleviate rural poverty? Empirical evidence from Bhutan. Forests Trees and Livelihoods. 25(3):187-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2016.1162754
  63. Rayamajhi S, Smith-hall C, Helles F. 2012. Forest policy and economics empirical evidence of the economic importance of Central Himalayan forests to rural households. Forest Pol Econ. 20:25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.02.007
  64. RECOFTC. 2013. Community forestry in Asia and the Pacific: pathway to inclusive development. Bangkok, Thailand: The Center for People and Forests (RECOFTC).
  65. RGC. 2011. Achieving Cambodia's Millenium Development Goals: Update 2011. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC).
  66. RGC. 2014. National Strategic Development Plan 2014-2018. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC).
  67. Rougoor W, Marrewijk C. 2015. Demography, growth, and global income inequality. World Dev. 74:220-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.013
  68. Sadath MN, Rahman S. 2014. Forest in crisis: 2 decades of media discourse analysis of Bangladesh print media. Forest Pol Econ. 68:16-21.
  69. Sasaki N, Chheng K, Mizoue N, Abe I, Lowe AJ. 2016. Forest reference emission level and carbon sequestration in Cambodia. Global Ecol Conserv. 7:82-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2016.05.004
  70. Schmitt CB, Burgess ND, Coad L, Belokurov A, Besancon C, Boisrobert L, Campbell A, Fish L, Gliddon D, Humphries K, et al. 2009. Global analysis of the protection status of the world's forests. Biol Conserv. 142(10):2122-2130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.04.012
  71. Silveira Neto RDM, Azzoni CR. 2011. Non-spatial government policies and regional income inequality in Brazil. Reg Stud. 45(4):453-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903241485
  72. Sunderland T, Achdiawan R, Angelsen A, Babigumira R, Ickowitz A, Paumgarten F, ... Shively G. 2014. Challenging perceptions about men, women, and forest product use: a global comparative study. World Dev. 64(S1):S56-S66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.003
  73. Swamy L, Drazen E, Johnson WR, Bukoski JJ. 2018. The future of tropical forests under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. J Sustainable Forestry. 37(2):221-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2017.1416477
  74. Tacconi L. 2007. Decentralization, forests and livelihoods: theory and narrative. Global Environ Change. 17(3-4):338-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.002
  75. Tadesse S, Woldetsadik M, Senbeta F. 2017. Forest users' level of participation in a participatory forest management program in southwestern Ethiopia. Forest Sci Technol. 13(4):164-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2017.1387613
  76. The World Bank. 2016. Poverty and shared prosperity 2016: taking on inequality. Washington, D.C., United States: The World Bank. Retrieved from http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/978-1-4648-0958-3.
  77. Uberhuaga P, Smith-Hall C, Helles F. 2012. Forest income and dependency in lowland Bolivia. Environ Dev Sustainability. 14(1):3-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-011-9306-8
  78. UN. 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common. New York, United States: United Nations (UN). Retrieved from http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf.
  79. UN. 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. New York, United States: United Nations (UN). Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.
  80. UN. 2015a. Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Paris, France: United Nations (UN). Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf.
  81. UN. 2015b. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. New York, United States: United Nations (UN). https://doi.org/978-92-1-101320-7.
  82. UN. 2015c. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York, United States: United Nations (UN). Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication.
  83. Wang XJ, Zhang JY, Shahid S, ElMahdi A, He RM, Wang XG, Ali M. 2012. Gini coefficient to assess equity in domestic water supply in the Yellow River. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 17(1):65-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9309-7
  84. Wells R. 2006. Education's effect on income inequality: an economic globalisation perspective. Globalisation, Soc Edu. 4(3): 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767720600955428
  85. Worku A, Pretzsch J, Kassa H, Auch E. 2014. Forest Policy and Economics The signi fi cance of dry forest income for livelihood resilience: The case of the pastoralists and agro-pastoralists in the drylands of southeastern Ethiopia, 41, 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.01.001
  86. WSP-EAP, WSP, ADB, AusAid, UKAid, World Commission on Environment and Development, ... ADB. 2014. Country poverty analysis 2014: Cambodia. Asian Development Bank. Mandaluyong: Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/documents/cambodia-country-povertyanalysis-2014.

Cited by

  1. Policy implications for community-managed forestry in Cambodia from experts’ assessments and case studies of community forestry practice vol.15, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-5021-3
  2. Women’s participation and the gender perspective in sustainable forestry in Cambodia: local perceptions and the context of forestry research vol.15, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2019.1595174
  3. Marine fishery dependence, poverty and inequality nexus along the coastal lowlands of Kenya vol.3, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3934/nar.2021008