Journal of the Korean Physical Society

Korean Physical Society (한국물리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improvement of the Beam-Wave Interaction Efficiency Based on the Coupling-Slot Configuration in an Extended Interaction Oscillator

  • Zhu, Sairong (School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China) ;
  • Yin, Yong (School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China) ;
  • Bi, Liangjie (School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China) ;
  • Chang, Zhiwei (School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China) ;
  • Xu, Che (School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China) ;
  • Zeng, Fanbo (School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China) ;
  • Peng, Ruibin (School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China) ;
  • Zhou, Wen (School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China) ;
  • Wang, Bin (School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China) ;
  • Li, Hailong (School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China) ;
  • Meng, Lin (School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)
  • Received : 2018.05.08
  • Accepted : 2018.06.11
  • Published : 2018.11.15
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A method aimed at improving the beam-wave interaction efficiency by changing the coupling slot configuration has been proposed in the study of extended interaction oscillators (EIOs). The dispersion characteristics, coupling coefficient and interaction impedance of the high-frequency structure based on different types of coupling slots have been investigated. Four types of coupled cavity structures with different layouts of the coupling slots have been compared to improve the beam-wave interaction efficiency, so as to analyze the beam-wave interaction and practical applications. In order to determine the improvement of the coupling slot to a coupled cavity circuit in an EIO, we designed four nine-gap EIOs based on the coupled cavity structure with different coupling slot configurations. With different operating frequencies and voltages takes into consideration, beam voltages from 27 to 33 kV have been simulated to achieve the best beam-wave interaction efficiency so that the EIOs are able to work in the $2{\pi}$ mode. The influence of the Rb and the ds on the output power is also taken into consideration. The Rb is the radius of the electron beam, and the ds is the width of the coupling slot. The simulation results indicate that a single-slot-type EIO has the best beam-wave interaction efficiency. Its maximum output power is 2.8 kW and the efficiency is 18% when the operating voltage is 31 kV and electric current is 0.5 A. The output powers of these four EIOs that were designed for comparison are not less than 1.7 kW. The improved coupling-slot configurations enables the extended interaction oscillator to meet the different engineering requirements better.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China, Central Universities

References

  1. Z. Chang, L. Meng, Y. Yin, C. Xu, L. Bi and Z. Zhang, in Proc. IEEE IVEC (Apr. 2016), p. 1, DOI: 10.1109/IVEC.2016.7561952.
  2. S. Chen, C. Ruan, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, D. Zhao, X. Yang and S. Wang, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 42, 91 (2014); DOI: 10.1109/TPS.2013.2293133.
  3. H. Yin, A. W. Cross, W. He, A. D. R. Phelps, K. Ronald, D. Bowes and C. W. Robertson, Phys. Plasmas 16, 063105-1 (2009); DOI: 10.1063/1.3155444.
  4. K. Fujisawa, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 11, 381 (1964); DOI: 10.1109/T-ED.1964.15346.
  5. J. Pasour, E. Wright, K. T. Nguyen, A. Balkcum, F. N. Wood, R. E. Myers and B. Levush, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 61, 1630 (2014); DOI: 10.1109/TED.2013.2295771.
  6. W. R. Day and J. A. Noland, Proc. 5th Internat'l Conf. on Microwave Tubes (1964), p. 157.
  7. J. H. Booske, R. J. Dobbs, C. D. Joye, C. L. Kory, G. R. Neil, G. Park, J. Park and R. J. Temkin, IEEE THz Sci. Technol 1, 54 (2011); DOI: 10.1109/TTHZ.2011.2151610.
  8. L. Renjie and R. Cunjun, in Proc. IEEE IVEC (Apr. 2016), p. 1, DOI: 10.1109/IVEC.2016.7561954.
  9. R. Xuxun, W. Jianxun, D. Kun, L. Guo, S. Guoxiang, F. Hao and E. A. Balfour, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 63, 4074 (2016); DOI: 10.1109/TED.2016.2595596.
  10. Y. Yin, W. He, L. Zhang, H. Yin, C. W. Robertson and A. W. Cross, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 63, 512 (2016); DOI: 10.1109/TED.2015.2502950.
  11. M. Cusick, R. Begum, D. Gajaria, T. Grant, P. Kolda, J. Legarra, C. Meyer, J. L. Ramirez-Aldana, D. S. Pedro, B. Stockwell and G. Yamane, in Proc. IEEE 13th IVEC (Apr. 2012), p. 227.
  12. W. Wiejak, in Proc. 18th Int. Conf. Microw. Radar Wireless Commun (Jun. 2010), p. 1.
  13. M. Chodorow and E. J. Nalos, in 1956 Proceedings of the IRE (1956), p. 649.
  14. M. Chodorow and T. wessel-berg, IRE Trans on Electron Devices (1960).
  15. A. I. Toreev, V. K. Fedorov and E. V. Patrusheva. Journal of Communication Technology and Electronic 54, 952 (2005); DOI: 10.1134/S1064226909080117.
  16. D. Berry, H. Deng, R. Dobbs, P. Horoyski, M. Hyttinen, A. Kingsmill, R. MacHattie, A. Roitman, E. Sokol and B. Steer, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 61, 1830 (2014); DOI: 10.1109/TED.2014.2302741.
  17. J. Hwang et al., J. Korean Phys. Soc. 69, 940 (2016), https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.69.940.
  18. E. Y. Sun and S. H. Chao, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 43, 1983 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1109/22.402290
  19. Y. Yin, B. Wang, L. Bi, Z. Chang, Z. Zhang, C. Xu and L. Meng, in Proc. IEEE IVEC (Apr. 2016), p. 1, DOI: 10.1109/IVEC.2016.7561860.
  20. Z. Zhang, Y. Yin, L. Bi, Z. Chang, C. Xu, B. Wang and L. Meng, Phys. Plasmas 24, 043103 (2017); DOI: 10.1063/1.4979353.