DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Differential QCD Predictions of the W± + 1 Jet for the Large Hadron Collider and Possible Future High Energy Colliders

  • Received : 2018.05.24
  • Accepted : 2018.06.08
  • Published : 2018.11.15

Abstract

The differential quantum chromodynamics (QCD) predictions for the $W^{\pm}$ boson and a single jet as functions of the lepton pseudorapidity in proton-proton collisions are presented up next-to-leading order correction in QCD. The predictions are done by using the most modern parton distribution functions (PDFs). To check the reliability of the PDFs, we compared 7 TeV predictions with the available experimental results at the corresponding energy. Finally, the differential QCD predictions and the asymmetry between the $W{^+}+1$ jet and $W{^-}+1$ jet events at $\sqrt{s}=7$, 8, 13, 14 and 100 TeV are discussed in detail.

Keywords

References

  1. P. M. Watkins, Contemp. Phys. 27, 291 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1080/00107518608211015
  2. F. Abe, H. Akimoto, A. Akopian, M. G. Albrow, S. R. Amendolia et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2626 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2626
  3. G. Aad, T. Abajyan, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah, S. A. Khalek et al., Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020
  4. S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan, A. Tu-masyan, W. Adam et al., Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021
  5. L. Evans and P. Bryant, JINST. 3, S08001 (2008).
  6. M. Benedikt and F. Zimmermann, CERN-ACC-2016-0005 (2016).
  7. T. Cornelis, J. of Physics 455, 012026 (2013).
  8. A. A. Paramonov, in Proceedings, 47th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (La Thuile, France, March 10-17, 2012), p.327.
  9. D. D. Price, EPJ Web Conf. 28:06006 (2012).
  10. G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah, S. A. Khalek, O. Abdinov et al., Eur. Phys. J. C. 75, 82 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3262-7
  11. A. M. Sirunyan, A. Tumasyan, W. Adam, F. Ambrogi, E. Asilar et al., Phys. Rev. D 96, 072005 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.072005
  12. E. Meoni, in 5th Large Hadron Collider Physics Conference 2017, LHCP 2017 (2017).
  13. K. Dilsiz and E. Tiras, Canadian J. of Phys. [Just-IN version; Published online on 19 March 2018]. DOI:10.1139/cjp-2017-0635
  14. J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 205-206, 10 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2010.08.011
  15. S. Dulat, T. Hou, J. Gao, M. Guzzi, J. Huston et al., Phys. Rev. D 93, 033006 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.033006
  16. L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, P. Motylinski and R. S. Thorne, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 204 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3397-6
  17. G. Aad, T. Abajyan, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah, S. A. Khalek et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3190-y
  18. G. P. Salam, Frascati Phys. Ser. 57, 155 (2013).
  19. H. Ogul and K. Dilsiz, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2017, 8262018 (2017).
  20. V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan, A. Tumasyan, W. Adam, E. Asilar et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 469 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4293-4