DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Image Quality and Radiation Dose of High-Pitch Dual-Source Spiral Cardiothoracic Computed Tomography in Young Children with Congenital Heart Disease: Comparison of Non-Electrocardiography Synchronization and Prospective Electrocardiography Triggering

  • Goo, Hyun Woo (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
  • Received : 2018.02.05
  • Accepted : 2018.05.08
  • Published : 2018.12.01

Abstract

Objective: To compare image quality and radiation dose of high-pitch dual-source spiral cardiothoracic computed tomography (CT) between non-electrocardiography (ECG)-synchronized and prospectively ECG-triggered data acquisitions in young children with congenital heart disease. Materials and Methods: Eighty-six children (${\leq}3$ years) with congenital heart disease who underwent high-pitch dual-source spiral cardiothoracic CT were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into two groups (n = 43 for each; group 1 with non-ECG-synchronization and group 2 with prospective ECG triggering). Patient-related parameters, radiation dose, and image quality were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in patient-related parameters including age, cross-sectional area, body density, and water-equivalent area between the two groups (p > 0.05). Regarding radiation dose parameters, only volume CT dose index values were significantly different between group 1 ($1.13{\pm}0.09mGy$) and group 2 ($1.07{\pm}0.12mGy$, p < 0.02). Among image quality parameters, significantly higher image noise ($3.8{\pm}0.7$ Hounsfield units [HU] vs. $3.3{\pm}0.6HU$, p < 0.001), significantly lower signal-to-noise ratio ($105.0{\pm}28.9$ vs. $134.1{\pm}44.4$, p = 0.001) and contrast-to-noise ratio ($84.5{\pm}27.2$ vs. $110.1{\pm}43.2$, p = 0.002), and significantly less diaphragm motion artifacts ($3.8{\pm}0.5$ vs. $3.7{\pm}0.4$, p < 0.04) were found in group 1 compared with group 2. Image quality grades of cardiac structures, coronary arteries, ascending aorta, pulmonary trunk, lung markings, and chest wall showed no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: In high-pitch dual-source spiral pediatric cardiothoracic CT, additional ECG triggering does not substantially reduce motion artifacts in young children with congenital heart disease.

Keywords

References

  1. Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK, Kim YH, Seo DM, Yun TJ, et al. CT of congenital heart disease: normal anatomy and typical pathologic conditions. Radiographics 2003;23 Spec No:S147-S165 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.23si035501
  2. Goo HW. State-of-the-art CT imaging techniques for congenital heart disease. Korean J Radiol 2010;11:4-18 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2010.11.1.4
  3. Goo HW, Yang DH. Coronary artery visibility in free-breathing young children with congenital heart disease on cardiac 64-slice CT: dual-source ECG-triggered sequential scan vs. single-source non-ECG-synchronized spiral scan. Pediatr Radiol 2010;40:1670-1680 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1693-8
  4. Goo HW. Current trends in cardiac CT in children. Acta Radiol 2013;54:1055-1062 https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2012.120452
  5. Goo HW. Coronary artery imaging in children. Korean J Radiol 2015;16:239-250 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.2.239
  6. Bang JH, Park JJ, Goo HW. Evaluation of commissural malalignment of aortic-pulmonary sinus using cardiac CT for arterial switch operation: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography. Pediatr Radiol 2017;47:556-564 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3786-0
  7. Goo HW. Identification of coronary artery anatomy on dualsource cardiac computed tomography before arterial switch operation in newborns and young infants: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography. Pediatr Radiol 2018;48:176-185 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-4004-9
  8. Flohr TG, Leng S, Yu L, Aiimendinger T, Bruder H, Petersilka M, et al. Dual-source spiral CT with pitch up to 3.2 and 75 ms temporal resolution: image reconstruction and assessment of image quality. Med Phys 2009;36:5641-5653 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3259739
  9. Goetti R, Feuchtner G, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, Fischer MA, Karlo C, et al. High-pitch dual-source CT coronary angiography: systolic data acquisition at high heart rates. Eur Radiol 2010;20:2565-2571 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1838-z
  10. Scharf M, Bink R, May MS, Hentschke C, Achenbach S, Uder M, et al. High-pitch thoracic CT with simultaneous assessment of coronary arteries: effect of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:602-609 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.02.014
  11. Bamberg F, Marcus R, Sommer W, Schwarz F, Nikolaou K, Becker CR, et al. Diagnostic image quality of a comprehensive high-pitch dual-spiral cardiothoracic CT protocol in patients with undifferentiated acute chest pain. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:3697-3702 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.032
  12. Kropil P, Rojas CA, Ghoshhajra B, Lanzman RS, Miese FR, Scherer A, et al. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for cardiac CT angiography in routine clinical practice: initial results. J Thorac Imaging 2012;27:194-201 https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0b013e318228223f
  13. Sun K, Han RJ, Ma LJ, Wang LJ, Li LG, Chen JH. Prospectively electrocardiogram-gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with high heart rates: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogramgated spiral acquisition mode. Korean J Radiol 2012;13:684-693 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.6.684
  14. Bischoff B, Meinel FG, Del Prete A, Reiser MF, Becker HC. High-pitch coronary CT angiography in dual-source CT during free breathing vs. breath holding in patients with low heart rates. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:2217-2221 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.09.003
  15. Wang Q, Qin J, He B, Zhou Y, Yang JJ, Hou XL, et al. Double prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for CT coronary angiography: initial experience. Clin Radiol 2013;68:792-798 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.03.004
  16. St Noble V, Douraghi-Zadeh D, Padley SP, Rubens MB, Nicol ED. Maximizing the clinical benefit of high-pitch, singleheartbeat CT coronary angiography in clinical practice. Clin Radiol 2014;69:674-677 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2014.01.013
  17. Deseive S, Pugliese F, Meave A, Alexanderson E, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of a prospectively electrocardiography-triggered high-pitch data acquisition strategy for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, randomized PROTECTION IV study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2015;9:278-285 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2015.03.001
  18. Lell MM, May M, Deak P, Alibek S, Kuefner M, Kuettner A, et al. High-pitch spiral computed tomography: effect on image quality and radiation dose in pediatric chest computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2011;46:116-123 https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181f33b1d
  19. Nie P, Wang X, Cheng Z, Ji X, Duan Y, Chen J. Accuracy, image quality and radiation dose comparison of high-pitch spiral and sequential acquisition on 128-slice dual-source CT angiography in children with congenital heart disease. Eur Radiol 2012;22:2057-2066 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2479-1
  20. Zheng M, Zhao H, Xu J, Wu Y, Li J. Image quality of ultralow-dose dual-source CT angiography using high-pitch spiral acquisition and iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2013;7:376-382 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2013.11.005
  21. Xu J, Zhao H, Wang X, Bai Y, Liu L, Liu Y, et al. Accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose of prospectively ECGtriggered high-pitch dual-source CT angiography in infants and children with complex coarctation of the aorta. Acad Radiol 2014;21:1248-1254 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.04.019
  22. Nie P, Yang G, Wang X, Duan Y, Xu W, Li H, et al. Application of prospective ECG-gated high-pitch 128-slice dual-source CT angiography in the diagnosis of congenital extracardiac vascular anomalies in infants and children. PLoS One 2014;9:e115793 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115793
  23. Sriharan M, Lazoura O, Pavitt CW, Castellano I, Owens CM, Rubens MB, et al. Evaluation of high-pitch ungated pediatric cardiovascular computed tomography for the assessment of cardiac structures in neonates. J Thorac Imaging 2016;31:177-182 https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000201
  24. Kanie Y, Sato S, Tada A, Kanazawa S. Image quality of coronary arteries on non-electrocardiography-gated highpitch dual-source computed tomography in children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2017;38:1393-1399 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-017-1675-9
  25. Goo HW. Individualized volume CT dose index determined by cross-sectional area and mean density of the body to achieve uniform image noise of contrast-enhanced pediatric chest CT obtained at variable kV levels and with combined tube current modulation. Pediatr Radiol 2011;41:839-847 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2121-4
  26. Hui PKT, Goo HW, Du J, Ip JJK, Kanzaki S, Kim YJ, et al. Asian consortium on radiation dose of pediatric cardiac CT (ASCIREDCARD). Pediatr Radiol 2017;47:899-910 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3847-4
  27. Goo HW. CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists. Korean J Radiol 2012;13:1-11 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.1.1
  28. Beeres M, Wichmann JL, Frellesen C, Bucher AM, Albrecht M, Scholtz JE, et al. ECG-gated versus non-ECG-gated high-pitch dual-source CT for whole body CT angiography (CTA). Acad Radiol 2016;23:163-167 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2015.09.003
  29. Wielandner A, Beitzke D, Schernthaner R, Wolf F, Langenberger C, Stadler A, et al. Is ECG triggering for motion artefact reduction in dual-source CT angiography of the ascending aorta still required with high-pitch scanning? The role of ECGgating in high-pitch dual-source CT of the ascending aorta. Br J Radiol 2016 Jun 27 [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160174
  30. Farshad-Amacker NA, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Frauenfelder T. Effect of high-pitch dual-source CT to compensate motion artifacts: a phantom study. Acad Radiol 2013;20:1234-1239 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2013.07.003
  31. Koch K, Oellig F, Oberholzer K, Bender P, Kunz P, Mildenberger P, et al. Assessment of right ventricular function by 16-detector-row CT: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2005;15:312-318 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2543-6
  32. Goo HW, Park SH. Semiautomatic three-dimensional CT ventricular volumetry in patients with congenital heart disease: agreement between two methods with different user interaction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;31 Suppl 2:223-232 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0751-6
  33. Goo HW, Allmendinger T. Combined electrocardiography- and respiratory-triggered CT of the lung to reduce respiratory misregistration artifacts between imaging slabs in freebreathing children: initial experience. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:860-866 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.5.860
  34. Beeres M, Loch M, Schulz B, Kerl M, Al-Butmeh F, Bodelle B, et al. Bolus timing in high-pitch CT angiography of the aorta. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:1028-1033 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.01.004
  35. Beeres M, Williams K, Bauer RW, Scholtz J, Kaup M, Gruber-Rouh T, et al. First clinical evaluation of high-pitch dualsource computed tomographic angiography comparing automated tube potential selection with automated tube current modulation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2015;39:624-628 https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000247

Cited by

  1. A Glimpse on Trends and Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in the Korean Journal of Radiology vol.20, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0928
  2. Trends in radiation dose and image quality for pediatric patients with a multidetector CT and a third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT vol.124, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01037-5
  3. Low Muscle Mass as a Prognostic Factor for Early Postoperative Outcomes in Pediatric Patients Undergoing the Fontan Operation: A Retrospective Cohort Study vol.8, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8081257
  4. Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in the Korean Journal of Radiology Based on the Citation Frequency vol.21, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1322
  5. Review of the Asian Consortium on Radiation Dose of Pediatric Cardiac CT (ASCI-REDCARD) and Recommendations for a New Edition vol.5, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.22468/cvia.2021.00269