References
- ASCI Practice Guideline Working Group, Beck KS, Kim JA, Choe YH, Hian SK, Hoe J, et al. 2017 multimodality appropriate use criteria for noninvasive cardiac imaging: expert consensus of the Asian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:871-880 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.871
- Takx RA, Blomberg BA, El Aidi H, Habets J, de Jong PA, Nagel E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8. pii: e002666
- Rieber J, Huber A, Erhard I, Mueller S, Schweyer M, Koenig A, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1465-1471 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl039
- Groothuis JG, Beek AM, Brinckman SL, Meijerink MR, van den Oever ML, Hofman MB, et al. Combined non-invasive functional and anatomical diagnostic work-up in clinical practice: the magnetic resonance and computed tomography in suspected coronary artery disease (MARCC) study. Eur Heart J 2013;34:1990-1998 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht077
- Rajiah P, Bolen MA. Cardiovascular MR imaging at 3 T: opportunities, challenges, and solutions. Radiographics 2014;34:1612-1635 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.346140048
- Meyer C, Strach K, Thomas D, Litt H, Nahle CP, Tiemann K, et al. High-resolution myocardial stress perfusion at 3 T in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 2008;18:226-233 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0746-3
- Lockie T, Ishida M, Perera D, Chiribiri A, De Silva K, Kozerke S, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0-Tesla to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:70-75 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.019
- Yun CH, Tsai JP, Tsai CT, Mok GS, Sun JY, Hung CL, et al. Qualitative and semi-quantitative evaluation of myocardium perfusion with 3 T stress cardiac MRI. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2015;15:164 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0159-1
- Strach K, Meyer C, Thomas D, Naehle CP, Schmitz C, Litt H, et al. High-resolution myocardial perfusion imaging at 3 T: comparison to 1.5 T in healthy volunteers. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1829-1835 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0560-3
- Walcher T, Ikuye K, Rottbauer W, Wohrle J, Bernhardt P. Is contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T superior to 1.5 T for detection of coronary artery disease? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29:355-361 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0099-0
- Cheng AS, Pegg TJ, Karamitsos TD, Searle N, Jerosch-Herold M, Choudhury RP, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2440-2449 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.028
- Jogiya R, Kozerke S, Morton G, De Silva K, Redwood S, Perera D, et al. Validation of dynamic 3-dimensional whole heart magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging against fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:756-765 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.075
- Chung HW, Ko SM, Hwang HK, So Y, Yi JG, Lee EJ. Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography, stress dual-energy CT perfusion, and stress perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography for coronary artery disease: comparison with combined invasive coronary angiography and stress perfusion cardiac MRI. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:476-486 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.3.476
- Ortiz-Perez JT, Rodriguez J, Meyers SN, Lee DC, Davidson C, Wu E. Correspondence between the 17-segment model and coronary arterial anatomy using contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:282-293
- Ebersberger U, Makowski MR, Schoepf UJ, Platz U, Schmidtler F, Rose J, et al. Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;14:1174-1180 https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet074
- Mordini FE, Haddad T, Hsu LY, Kellman P, Lowrey TB, Aletras AH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7:14-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.08.014
- Greenwood JP, Motwani M, Maredia N, Brown JM, Everett CC, Nixon J, et al. Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease from the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance imaging in Coronary heart disease (CE-MARC) trial. Circulation 2014;129:1129-1138 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000071
- Motwani M, Maredia N, Fairbairn TA, Kozerke S, Greenwood JP, Plein S. Assessment of ischaemic burden in angiographic three-vessel coronary artery disease with high-resolution myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:701-708 https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet286
- Klem I, Heitner JF, Shah DJ, Sketch MH Jr, Behar V, Weinsaft J, et al. Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1630-1638 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.074
- Li M, Zhou T, Yang LF, Peng ZH, Ding J, Sun G. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial magnetic resonance perfusion to diagnose ischemic stenosis with fractional flow reserve as reference: systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7:1098-1105 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.07.011
- Pijls NH, Sels JW. Functional measurement of coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1045-1057 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.077
- Neglia D, Rovai D, Caselli C, Pietila M, Teresinska A, Aguade-Bruix S, et al.; EVINCI Study Investigators. Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8. pii: e002179
Cited by
- Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 3: Perfusion, Delayed Enhancement, and T1- and T2 Mapping vol.20, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0411
- Myocardial Blood Flow Quantified by Low-Dose Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Is Associated with Peak Troponin Level and Impaired Left Ventricle Function in Patients with ST-Elevated Myocardial vol.20, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0729
- Guideline for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 1: Standardized Protocol vol.3, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.22468/cvia.2019.00108
- Guideline for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 1: Standardized Protocol vol.20, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0398
- Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 2: Interpretation of Cine, Flow, and Angiography Data vol.3, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.22468/cvia.2019.00115
- Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 2: Interpretation of Cine, Flow, and Angiography Data vol.20, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0407
- Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (KOSCI) - Part 1: Standardized Protocol vol.23, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13104/imri.2019.23.4.296
- Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (KOSCI) - Part 2: Interpretation of Cine, Flow, and Angiography Data vol.23, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13104/imri.2019.23.4.316
- Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 3: Perfusion, Delayed Enhancement, and T1- and T2 Mapping vol.4, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.22468/cvia.2019.00171
- Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (KOSCI) - Part 3: Perfusion, Delayed Enhancement, and T1- and T2 Mapping vol.24, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13104/imri.2020.24.1.1