DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prediction of the human in vivo antiplatelet effect of S- and R-indobufen using population pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation based on in vitro platelet aggregation test

  • Noh, Yook-Hwan (Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Han, Sungpil (Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Choe, Sangmin (Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Jung, Jin-Ah (Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Jung, Jin-Ah (Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Hwang, Ae-Kyung (Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacogenetic Laboratory, Clinical Research Center, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Lim, Hyeong-Seok (Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
  • Received : 2018.11.23
  • Accepted : 2018.12.12
  • Published : 2018.12.15

Abstract

Indobufen ($Ibustrin^{(R)}$), a reversible inhibitor of platelet aggregation, exists in two enantiomeric forms in 1:1 ratio. Here, we characterized the anti-platelet effect of S- and R-indobufen using response surface modeling using $NONMEM^{(R)}$ and predicted the therapeutic doses exerting the maximal efficacy of each enantioselective S- and R-indobufen formulation. S- and R-indobufen were added individually or together to 24 plasma samples from drug-naïve healthy subjects, generating 892 samples containing randomly selected concentrations of the drugs of 0-128 mg/L. Collagen-induced platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma was determined using a Chrono-log Lumi-Aggregometer. Inhibitory sigmoid $I_{max}$ model adequately described the anti-platelet effect. The S-form was more potent, whereas the R-form showed less inter-individual variation. No significant interaction was observed between the two enantiomers. The anti-platelet effect of multiple treatments with 200 mg indobufen twice daily doses was predicted in the simulation study, and the effect of S- or R-indobufen alone at various doses was predicted to define optimal dosing regimen for each enantiomer. Simulation study predicted that 200 mg twice daily administration of S-indobufen alone will produce more treatment effect than S-and R-mixture formulation. S-indobufen produced treatment effect at lower concentration than R-indobufen. However, inter-individual variation of the pharmacodynamic response was smaller in R-indobufen. The present study suggests the optimal doses of R-and S-enantioselective indobufen formulations in terms of treatment efficacy for patients with thromboembolic problems. The proposed methodology in this study can be applied to the develop novel enantio-selective drugs more efficiently.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Grant : Establishment of risk management platform with aim to reduce attrition of new drugs and its service

Supported by : Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MI), Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI)

References

  1. Bhana N, McClellan KJ. Indobufen: an updated review of its use in the management of atherothrombosis. Drugs Aging 2001;18:369-388. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200118050-00007
  2. Patrignani P, Volpi D, Ferrario R, Romanzini L, Di Somma M, Patrono C. Effects of racemic, S- and R-indobufen on cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase activities in human whole blood. Eur J Pharmacol 1990;191:83-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(90)94098-I
  3. Glowka FK, Karazniewicz M. Resolution of indobufen enantiomers by capillary zone electrophoresis. Pharmacokinetic studies of human serum. J Chromatogr A 2004;1032:219-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2003.10.056
  4. Glowka FK. Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of indobufen from tablets and intramuscular injections in man. Chirality 2000;12:38-42. doi: 10.1002/ (SICI)1520-636X(2000)12:1<38::AID-CHIR7>3.0.CO;2-O.
  5. Glowka FK, Strzelecka D, Zapalski S. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of indobufen enantiomers in patients with obliterative atherosclerosis. Chirality 2001;13:308-312. doi: 10.1002/chir.1036.
  6. Korea good clinical practice (KGCP) [in Korean]. http://www.law.go.kr/lsSc.do?menuId=0&p1=&subMenu=1&query=%EC%95%BD%EC%82%AC%EB%B2%95+%EC%8B%9C%ED%96%89%EA%B7%9C%EC%B9%99&x=0&y=0#AJAX Accessed 20 March 2013
  7. Angiolillo DJ, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Bernardo E, Ramirez C, Escaned J, Moreno R, et al. 807 C/T Polymorphism of the glycoprotein Ia gene and pharmacogenetic modulation of platelet response to dual antiplatelet treatment. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2004;15:427-433. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mbc.0000114439.81125.86
  8. Mandema JW, Verotta D, Sheiner LB. Building population pharmacokinetic--pharmacodynamic models. I. Models for covariate effects. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1992;20:511-528. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061469
  9. Wahlby U, Jonsson EN, Karlsson MO. Assessment of actual significance levels for covariate effects in NONMEM. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2001;28:231-252. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011527125570
  10. Minto CF, Schnider TW, Short TG, Gregg KM, Gentilini A, Shafer SL. Response surface model for anesthetic drug interactions. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1603-1616. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200006000-00017
  11. Gabrielsson J, Weiner D. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data analysis: Concepts and applications. Swedish Pharmaceutical Press, 2000

Cited by

  1. Copper-promoted direct amidation of isoindolinone scaffolds by sodium persulfate vol.19, pp.35, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ob01054a