DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Soft Tissue Measurement Method Using Radiopaque Material on Cone-beam Computed Tomography: An Ex Vivo Validation Study

  • Lee, Hae-Seok (Department of Periodontology, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Yun, Jeong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Won (Department of Periodontology, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2018.11.27
  • Accepted : 2018.12.18
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reproducibility of a method based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) technology for the visualization and measurement of gingival soft-tissue dimensions. Material and Methods: A total of 66 selected points in soft-tissue of the ex vivo head of an adult pig were investigated in this study. For the measurement of radiographic thickness (RT), wet soft-tissue surfaces were lightly covered with barium sulfate powder using a powder spray. CBCT was taken and DICOM files were assessed for soft-tissue thickness measurement at reference points. A periodontal probe and a rubber stop were used for the measurement of trans-gingival probing thickness (TPT). After flap elevation, actual thickness of soft-tissue (actual thickness, AT) was measured. Correlation analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients analysis (ICC) were performed for AT, TPT, and RT. Results: All variables were distributed normally. Strong significant correlations of AT with RT and TPT values were found. The two ICC values between TPT vs. AT and RT vs. AT differed significantly. Conclusion: Our results indicated that correlation of RT was stronger than that of TPT with AT. We concluded that soft tissue measurement with CBCT could be a reliable method, compared to the trans-gingival probing measurement method.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Yonsei University College of Dentistry

References

  1. Lee DW, Kim CK, Park KH, et al. Non-invasive method to measure the length of soft tissue from the top of the papilla to the crestal bone. J Periodontol. 2005; 76: 1311-1314. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.8.1311
  2. Lee DW, Park KH, Moon IS. Dimension of interproximal soft tissue between adjacent implants in two distinctive implant systems. J Periodontol. 2006; 77: 1080-1084. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050351
  3. Lee DW, Huh JK, Park KH, et al. Comparison of interproximal soft tissue height for single implants and contra-lateral natural teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 1320-1325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01737.x
  4. Claffey N, Shanley D. Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 1986; 13: 654-657. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb00861.x
  5. Foushee DG, Moriarty JD, Simpson DM. Effects of Mandibular Orthognathic Treatment on Mucogingival Tissues. J Periodontol. 1985; 56: 727-733. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1985.56.12.727
  6. Ronay V, Sahrmann P, Bindl A, et al. Current status and perspectives of mucogingival soft tissue measurement methods. J Esthet Dent. 2011; 23: 146-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00424.x
  7. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006; 72: 75-80.
  8. Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, et al. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig. 2006; 10: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0031-2
  9. Januario AL, Barriviera M, Duarte WR. Soft Tissue Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Novel Method for the Measurement of Gingival Tissue and the Dimensions of the Dentogingival Unit. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008; 20: 366-373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00210.x
  10. Barriviera M, Duarte WR, Januario AL, et al. A new method to assess and measure palatal masticatory mucosa by cone-beam computerized tomography. J Clin Periodontol. 2009; 36: 564-568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01422.x
  11. Cao J, Hu WJ, Zhang H, et al. A novel technique for measurement of dentogingival tissue by cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015; 119: 82-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.10.022
  12. Silva JNN, Andrade PF, Sotto-Maior BS, et al. Influence of lip retraction on the cone beam computed tomography assessment of bone and gingival tissues of the anterior maxilla. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017; 123: 714-720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.02.005
  13. Ueno D, Sato J, Igarashi C, et al. Accuracy of oral mucosal thickness measurements using spiral computed tomography. J Periodontol. 2011; 82: 829-836. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100160
  14. Wara-aswapati N, Pitiphat W, Chandrapho N, et al. Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age. J Periodontol. 2001; 72: 1407-1412. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1407
  15. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86: 420. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
  16. Fleiss JL. Reliability of measurement. In: Fleiss JL, The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. 1st ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1986. p.1-32.
  17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204
  18. Webber RL, Ruttimann UE, Heaven TJ. Calibration errors in digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res. 1990; 25: 268-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1990.tb00915.x
  19. Eger T, Muller HP, Heinecke A. Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. J Clin Periodontol 1996; 23: 839-845. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00621.x