한국조류학회지 (Korean Journal of Ornithology)

  • 제25권2호
  • /
  • Pages.94-100
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1225-9179(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-6893(eISSN)
한국조류학회(鳥類) (The Ornithological Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

몽골 남부지역의 야생조류 사고: 감전사를 중심으로

Bird accidents in Southern Mongolia: a case study of bird electrocution

  • 투고 : 2018.08.28
  • 심사 : 2018.12.05
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

몽골의 초원이나 사막과 같은 개방지역에 설치된 송전선로에서 발생하는 조류 감전사고는 매우 흔하게 보고되고 있다. 본 연구는 조류피해조사를 위해 2017년 몽골 남부지역의 준사막 지역에 설치된 15-kV의 송전선로에 4월, 7월, 9월 등 총 3회에 걸쳐 조사를 실시하였다. 전체 250개의 전신주 구간에서 총 12종 45개체의 감전사한 조류를 확인하였다(10㎞마다 1.12% 사망률). 주요 감전 피해 조류는 멸종위기종인 Falco cherrug (n=11)와 Milvus migrans (n=11)로 나타났다. 본 연구지역과 같이 개방된 환경에서의 조류를 위한 잠자리 또는 휴식처의 부족은 보다 많은 조류의 감전사고를 발생시킬 수 있으며, 특히 몽골의 다른 개방지역에서도 발생할 수 있다. 사고현장에서 종동정이 어려운 개체의 경우, 시료의 유전자 증폭 등을 통해 DNA 분석을 실시하여 동정하였다. 본 연구결과 몽골의 개방지역에서 조류의 감전사고는 조류에게 발생하는 위험요소 중 높은 비율을 차지하고 있는 것으로 확인되었으며, 특히 맹금류에게 빈번하며, 간헐적으로 이동철새에게도 일어나고 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 개방된 지역일 경우 조류의 감전사고가 더 잘 발생할 수 있으며, 감전사고와 같은 조류의 위험요소를 보다 잘 이해하는 것은 멸종위기종과 같은 종보전에 기여할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Bird electrocution on contact with electricity lines is well reported and is quite common in Mongolian open areas. We visited 15-kV electricity distribution pole lines in a Southern Mongolian semi-desert region three times in 2017, in April, July, and September, to assess their risks to birds. The carcasses of 45 electrocuted birds representing 12 species were identified from 250 poles (overall mortality rate of 1.12% every 10 km). The majority of these electrocuted birds were endangered Saker Falcon (n=11) and common Black Kite (n=11). The lacks of roosting or perching sites in our study sites (indeed other open areas in Mongolia) may resulted for such high rate bird electrocution. A 751-base pair (bp) cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene was amplified for DNA sequence-based identification of carcasses that were difficult to identify directly. Our findings revealed the high electrocution risk for birds in Mongolian open areas, especially for the birds of prey, with relatively low-efficiency electrocution mitigation approaches. The findings also indicate that there is a need for better understanding of the risk of bird electrocution, particularly in the open areas. This will contribute to the conservation of endangered species.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : National Science Museum of Korea

참고문헌

  1. APLIC-Avian Power Line Interaction Committee. 2006. Suggested practices for avian protection on power lines: the state of the art in 2006. Edison Electric Institute, Washington, DC, Avian Power Line, Interaction Committee, and the California Energy Commission, Sacramento.
  2. Davaasuren B., N. Batbayar, B. Galbat, B. Bold, S. Gombobaatar, E. Dixon and S. Batkhuu. 2014. Avian Electrocution at 15kV power line in Mongolia. Toodog ornithological Journal, 1, pp. 26-32.
  3. Dixon A., M.L. Rahman, B. Galtbalt, A. Gunga, B. Sugarsaikhan and N. Batbayar. 2017. Avian electrocution rates associated with density of active small mammal holes and power-pole mitigation: Implications for the conservation of threatened raptors in Mongolia. Journal for Nature Conservation, 36, pp. 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2017.01.001
  4. Ellis D.H., M.H. Ellis, and Tsengeg, P. 1997. Remarkable Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug) breeding. Journal of Raptor Research, 31(3), pp. 234-240.
  5. Gombobaatar S. and E.M. Monks. 2011. Regional Red List Series Vol. 7. Birds. Zoological Society of London, National University of Mongolia and Mongolian Ornithological Society. (In English and Mongolian)
  6. Harness R., S. Gombobaatar and Yosef, R. 2008. Mongolian distribution power lines and raptor electrocutions. In Rural Electric Power Conference, 2008 IEEE (pp. C1-C1). IEEE.
  7. Hebert P.D., E.H. Penton, J.M. Burns, D.H. Janzen and W. Hallwachs. 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(41), pp. 14812-14817. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406166101
  8. Horvath M.B., B. Martinez-Cruz, J.J. Negro, L. Kalmar and J.A. Godoy. 2005. An overlooked DNA source for non-invasive genetic analysis in birds. Journal of avian biology, 36(1), pp. 84-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0908-8857.2005.03370.x
  9. Jambaajamts A. 1989. Climate brief Overview of Rebuplic of Mongolia. National Press Office. Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  10. Kemper C.M., G.S. Court and J.A. Beck. 2013. Estimating raptor electrocution mortality on distribution power lines in Alberta, Canada. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 77(7), pp. 1342-1352. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.586
  11. Kozlova E.V. 1930. Birds of South-Western Baikal, Northern Mongolia and Central Gobi. Moscow. Nauka, pp. 80-82. (In Russia)
  12. Lopez-Lopez P., M. Ferrer, A. Madero, E. Casado and M. McGrady. 2011. Solving man-induced large-scale conservation problems: the Spanish imperial eagle and power lines. PLoS One, 6(3), p. e17196. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017196
  13. Mundy N.I., C.S Winchell, T. Burr and D.S. Woodruff. 1997. Microsatellite variation and microevolution in the critically endangered San Clemente Island loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus mearnsi). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 264(1383), pp. 869-875. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1997.0121
  14. Morin P.A., J.E.A.N.N.E. Messier and D.S. Woodruff. 1994. DNA extraction, amplification, and direct sequencing from hornbill feathers. Journal of the Science Society of Thailand, 20(4), pp. 31-41. https://doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.1994.20.031
  15. Navrud S., R.C. Ready, K. Magnussen and O. Bergland. 2008. Valuing the social benefits of avoiding landscape degradation from overhead power transmission lines: Do underground cables pass the benefit-cost test? Landscape Research, 33(3), pp. 281-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390802045921
  16. Petersen J.L., R. Bischof, G.L. Krapu and A.L. Szalanski. 2003. Genetic variation in the midcontinental population of sandhill cranes, Grus canadensis. Biochemical Genetics, 41(1), pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020985427461
  17. Prinsen H.A.M. J.J. Smallie, G.C. Boere and N. Pires. 2011. Guidelines on how to avoid or mitigate impact of electricity power grids on migratory birds in the African-Eurasian region. Bonn, Germany: CMS Technical Series No. 20th, AEWA Technical Series No. 20th.
  18. Purevdorj A. and G. Sundev. 2012. The assessment of high risk utility lines and conservation of globally threatened pole nesting steppe raptors in Mongolia. Ornis Mongolica, 1, pp. 2-12.
  19. Segelbacher G. 2002. Noninvasive genetic analysis in birds: testing reliability of feather samples. Molecular Ecology Resources, 2(3), pp. 367-369.
  20. Rudnick J.A., T.E. Katzner, E.A. Bragin and J.A. DeWoody. 2007. Species identification of birds through genetic analysis of naturally shed feathers. Molecular Ecology Resources, 7(5), pp. 757-762.

피인용 문헌

  1. The Use of Mobile Nesting Platforms to Reduce Electrocution Risk to Ferruginous Hawks vol.54, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3356/0892-1016-54.2.177
  2. Avian-power line interactions in the Gobi Desert of Mongolia: are mitigation actions effective? vol.12, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-021-00277-2