DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Osteoporotic bone phenotype in Mats1/2 double-mutant mice

Mats1과 Mats2 이중결손 유전자 돌연변이에 의한 골감소증 기전에 대한 연구

  • Oh, Juhwan (Department of Oral Physiology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, YunJeong (Department of Oral Physiology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ryu, Mi Heon (Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Bae, Moon-Kyoung (Department of Oral Physiology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyung Joon (Department of Oral Physiology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 오주환 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강생리학교실) ;
  • 최윤정 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강생리학교실) ;
  • 유미현 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강병리학교실) ;
  • 배문경 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강생리학교실) ;
  • 김형준 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강생리학교실)
  • Received : 2018.11.27
  • Accepted : 2018.12.14
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

The Hippo pathway was originally discovered in Drosophila by genetic screening and it has been shown to be conserved in various organisms including human. Until now, the essential roles of Hippo pathway in regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis, tumorigenesis, and organ size control is extensively studied. Currently, Mats1/2 (Mob1a/1b), one of the important components in Hippo pathway, mutant mice were generated which has abnormal phenotype such as resistance to apoptosis and spontaneous tumorigenesis. Of note, Mats1/2 mutant mice also showed dental malocclusion. Therefore, in this study, we have evaluated the bone phenotype of Mats1/2 mutant mice. Although the mRNA expressions of Mats1 or Mats2 were observed in both osteoclastogenesis and osteoblastogenesis, the increase of Mats1 level was most prominent during osteoblastogenesis. The RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation from bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) was unaltered upon Mats1/2 mutation; however, the osteoblast differentiation using calvarial pre-osteoblasts was significantly reduced in Mats1/2 mutant mice compare to that of wild type mice. In accordance with in vitro results, Mats1/2 mutant mice showed decreased bone volume as well as increased trabecular separation in ${\mu}CT$ analyses. These results may provide novel prospect of the probable linkage between Hippo pathway and bone homeostasis.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 부산대학교

References

  1. Bae SJ, Luo X: Activation mechanisms of the Hippo kinase signaling cascade. Biosci Rep. 2018; 29:38(4).
  2. Kim W, Jho EH: The history and regulatory mechanism of the Hippo pathway. BMB Rep. 2018; 51(3):106-118. https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2018.51.3.022
  3. Zhu C, Li L, Zhao B: The regulation and function of YAP transcription co-activator. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2015; 47(1):16-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/abbs/gmu110
  4. Zhao B, Lei QY, Guan KL: The Hippo-YAP pathway: new connections between regulation of organ size and cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008; 20(6): 638-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2008.10.001
  5. Halder G, Johnson RL: Hippo signaling: growth control and beyond. Development. 2011; 138(1): 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.045500
  6. Wang J, Liu S, Heallen T, Martin JF: The Hippo pathway in the heart: pivotal roles in development, disease, and regeneration. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018; 15(11): 672-684. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-018-0063-3
  7. Pan D: The hippo signaling pathway in development and cancer. Dev Cell. 2010; 19(4): 491-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.09.011
  8. Zhao B, Lei QY, Guan KL: The Hippo-YAP pathway: new connections between regulation of organ size and cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008; 20(6): 638-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2008.10.001
  9. Nishio M, Hamada K, Kawahara K, Sasaki M, Noguchi F, Chiba S, Mizuno K, Suzuki SO, Dong Y, Tokuda M, Morikawa T, Hikasa H, Eggenschwiler J, Yabuta N, Nojima H, Nakagawa K, Hata Y, Nishina H, Mimori K, Mori M, Sasaki T, Mak TW, Nakano T, Itami S, Suzuki A: Cancer susceptibility and embryonic lethality in Mob1a/1b double-mutant mice. J Clin Invest. 2012; 122(12): 4505-18. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI63735
  10. Nakashima T, Hayashi M, Takayanagi H: New insights into osteoclastogenic signaling mechanisms. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2012; 23(11): 582-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2012.05.005
  11. Asagiri M, Takayanagi H: The molecular understanding of osteoclast differentiation. Bone. 2007; 40(2): 251-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2006.09.023
  12. Komori T: Roles of Runx2 in Skeletal Development. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017; 962: 83-93.
  13. Komori T: Regulation of bone development and extracellular matrix protein genes by RUNX2. Cell Tissue Res. 2010; 339(1): 189-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-009-0832-8
  14. Matsumoto Y, La Rose J, Kent OA, Wagner MJ, Narimatsu M, Levy AD, Omar MH, Tong J, Krieger JR, Riggs E, Storozhuk Y, Pasquale J, Ventura M, Yeganeh B, Post M, Moran MF, Grynpas MD, Wrana JL, Superti-Furga G, Koleske AJ, Pendergast AM, Rottapel R: Reciprocal stabilization of ABL and TAZ regulates osteoblastogenesis through transcription factor RUNX2. J Clin Invest. 2016; 126(12): 4482-4496. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI87802
  15. Hong JH, Yaffe MB: TAZ: a beta-catenin-like molecule that regulates mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Cell Cycle. 2006; 5(2): 176-9. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.5.2.2362