DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Enhancing Seed Productivity and Feed Value of Oats (Avena sativa L.) with Different Seeding Rate and Nitrogen Fertilizing Levels in Gyeongbuk Area

  • Tomple, Byamungu Mayange (Department of Animal Resources, College of Life and Environmental Science, Daegu University) ;
  • Hwan, Jo Ik (Department of Animal Resources, College of Life and Environmental Science, Daegu University)
  • Received : 2018.08.21
  • Accepted : 2018.11.28
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

The aim of this present study was to investigate the impact of different seeding rate and nitrogen fertilizing levels on the seed yield and feed value of oats(Avena sativa L.) grown in Gyeongbuk area for two years. The experiment was arranged in split plot design with 3 main plots(100, 130 and 160 kg of seed/ha) and 4 subplots(0, 50, 70 and 90 kg N/ha), with 3 replicates. Heading, flowering, and maturing dates of oats sown in spring 2017, delayed by two days compared to that of spring 2016, and the plant height of spring 2017 were significantly shorter than that of spring 2016(18.1 ~ 23.4 cm). In addition, the highest number of stems and number of panicles according to different seeding rate and nitrogen fertilizing levels were achieved with the seeding rate of 160 kg/ha and 90 kg of N/ha in 2016 and 2017, respectively. In case of seed yield as affected by different seeding rate, the highest seed yield was achieved with a seeding rate of 130 kg/ha(p<0.05), and based on nitrogen fertilizing levels, the highest yield was obtained in 50 kg of N/ha compared to others. The crude fiber(CF), neutral detergent fiber(NDF) and total digestible nutrients(TDN) of oats cultivated and harvested in spring 2016 and 2017 according to different sowing rate were the highest in the seeding rate of 130 kg/ha. The crude protein(CP) content and total digestible nutrients(TDN) of 2016-2017 as influenced by nitrogen fertilizer levels were the highest in the nitrogen fertilizer level of 90 and 50 kg N/ha, respectively. In conclusion, the proper seeding rate and the optimal nitrogen fertilizing level in Gyeongju, Gyeongbuk province were considered to be the most appropriate in 130 kg/ha and 50 kg of N/ha, respectively.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Daegu University

References

  1. Ahmad AH, Wahid A, Fiaz N and Zamir M. 2011. Impact of organic and inorganic sources of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of forage oat(Avena sativa L.), Agron. Res. Moldavia. 44: 39-49.
  2. AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis, (17th edition). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
  3. Bilal M, Ayub M, Tariq M, Tahir M and Nadeem MA. 2017. Dry matter yield and forage quality traits of oat(Avena sativa L.) under integrative use of microbial and synthetic source of nitrogen. J. Saudi Society of Agric. Sci. 16: 236-241.
  4. Chalmers A, Dyer C and Sylvester-Bradley R. 1998. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the grain yield and quality of winter oats. J. of Agric. Sci. 131: 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859698006042
  5. Cho NK, Song SW, Kang YK, Song CK and Moon HK. 2002. Effect of split nitrogen application on yield potential and feeding value of oats cultivars. J. Subtropical Agric. & Biotech. Sci. 18: 59-69.
  6. Gasim SH. 2001. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and seed rate on growth, yield and quality of forage maize(Zea mays L.). M. Sc. Thesis, University of Khartoum, Faculty of Agriculture, Sudan.
  7. Han OK, Park TI, Seo JH, Park KH, Park HH, Kim KH, Kim KJ, Ju JI, Jang YJ, Park NG and Kim JG. 2010. A new forage winter oat cultivar for the southern regions of Korea. Korean J. Breed. Sci. 42: 231-235.
  8. Joo ST. 2016. Effects of seeding rate and nitrogen fertilization on seed production and feed value of oats in Gangwon area. M.Sc. Thesis, Yonsei University, Dept. of Biological Science and Technology, Korea.
  9. KOSTAT. Statistics Korea. http://kostat.go.kr, Last accessed Jan. 2016.
  10. Laghari GM, Oad FC, Tunio S, Chachar Q, Gandahi AW and Siddiqui MH. 2011. Growth and yield attributes of wheat at different seed rates. S. J. Agric. 27: 177-183.
  11. Linn J and Martin N. 1989. Forage quality tests and interpretation. University of Minnesota Ext. Serv. AG-FO-2637. Minnesota.
  12. Lloveras J, Manent J, Viudas J, Lopez A and Santiveri P. 2004. Seeding rate influence on yield and yield components of irrigated winter wheat in a Mediterranean climate. Agron. J. 96: 1258-1265. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.1258
  13. Marinus JM, Clemens CM, Hetty C, Ingrid M, Israel-Hoevelakena RD, Bert-Jan VD, Susanne B and Luud JWJ. 2018. Oats in healthy gluten-free and regular diets: A perspective. Food Research Intern. 110: 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.031
  14. Mohler CL, Liebman and Staver CP. 2001. Cambridge University Press. Ecological management of agricultural weeds. pp.269-321. Cambridge.
  15. Mohr R, Grant C, May W and Stevenson F. 2007. The influence of nitrogen, phosphorus and potash fertilizer application on oat yield and quality. Can. J. Soil Sci. 87: 459-468. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJSS06022
  16. Otteson BN, Mergoum M and Ransom JK. 2007. Seeding rate and nitrogen management effect on spring wheat yield and yield components. Agron. J. 99: 1615-1621. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2007.0002
  17. Peltonen-Sainio P and Jarvinen P. 1995. Seeding rate effects on tillering, grain yield, and yield components of oat at high latitude. Field Crop Res. 40: 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(94)00089-U
  18. Rural Development Administration. 2012. Standardization for research survey on agricultural science and technology. pp.339-358. Korea.
  19. SAS. 2016. Statistical Analysis System ver. 9.1. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.
  20. Stein HH, Lagosa B and Casas GA. 2016. Nutritional value of feed ingredients of plant origin fed to pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 218: 33-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.003
  21. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB and Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  22. Veselinka Z, Jelena B, Desimir K and Danica M. 2014. Effect of seeding rate on grain quality of winter wheat. Chilean J. Agric. Res. 74: 23-28. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392014000100004
  23. Walter E, Baethgen C, Bruce C and Adriana G. 1995. Nitrogen fertilizer effects on growth, grain yield, and yield components of malting barley, Field Crop. Res. 43: 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(95)00034-N
  24. Welch RW. 1995. Oat for animal feed, London, England. pp.321-358.
  25. World Bank. 2016. http://www.worldbank.org, Last accessed Janv. 2018.
  26. Zhou MX, Glennie HM, Robards K, Roberts GL and Helliwell S. 1998. Effects of sowing date, nitrogen application, and sowing rate on oat quality. Australian J. Agric. Res. 49: 845-852. https://doi.org/10.1071/A97146

Cited by

  1. Yield Performance of Spring Oats Varieties as a Response to Fertilization and Sowing Distance vol.11, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050815