Journal of Technology Innovation (기술혁신연구)

Korea Society for Innovation Managemetn & Economics (기술경영경제학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on Product Architecture and Organizational Capability of Shipbuilding Industry in South Korea and China

한·중 조선 산업의 제품 아키텍처와 조직역량에 관한 연구

  • 백서인 (과학기술정책연구원) ;
  • 이성민 (한국과학기술원 기술경영대학원) ;
  • 이덕희 (한국과학기술원 기술경영학부)
  • Received : 2018.02.21
  • Accepted : 2018.04.02
  • Published : 2018.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As companies seek lower cost and superior quality at the same time, which depend on improvement in product architecture, they need to critically consider product architecture as part of corporate strategy. This research investigated how product architecture and organizational capability affect innovative outcomes with using architecture framework. As a result, we were able to find out Korean shipbuilding company has put much effort on integral works such as development of FGSS(Fuel gas supply system), PRS(Partial Re-liquefaction System) and weight lightening for improving fuel efficiency. And this kind of integral ability was realized by organizational capability of Korean shipbuilding company based on interactive relationship with plant workers. In contrast, Chinese shipbuilding companies focused excessively on the standard design and the convenience of research and development made by central government, overlooking the need for fine-tuning. As a result, the fuel efficiency of Chinese LNG ships turned out to be 7-10% lower than those of South Korea with using the same modules and components.

기업들이 저원가와 높은 품질을 동시에 추구하게 됨에 따라 제품 아키텍처 기반 경쟁은 기업 전략의 중요한 일부가 되었다. 본 연구는 한 중 조선 산업(LNGC)분야 대표기업의 제품 아키텍처와 조직역량을 비교 분석하여 그들이 어떻게 혁신성과를 이루어 냈는지 고찰하였다. 그 결과, 한국기업은 동력계열의 연구개발에 있어 FGSS(Fuel gas supply system), PRS(Partial Re-liquefaction System)와 같이 에너지 효율을 개선하는 장치를 자체 개발하여 기존엔진에 추가하고, 선체 무게를 경량화 하는 등 다양한 미세조정 노력을 통해 우수한 성능을 가지게 하였다. 이는 우수한 연구조직 역량과 현장과의 긴밀한 협업을 통해 실현되었으며, 고부가가치선의 높은 매출로 이어질 수 있었다. 반면 중국 기업은 설계 및 연구개발의 편의성에 집중하여, 기존의 부품에 대한 미세조정 노력을 소홀히 했고 그 결과 동일한 부품을 사용하고도 한국의 선박에 비해 7-10% 낮은 연비 효율을 지닌 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽기호.백서인 (2017), "후발주자의 추격과 추락: 중국 굴삭기 시장에서의 기회의 창과 중국과 한국의 전략적 대응에 관한 연구", 전략경영연구, 제20권 제2호, pp. 79-112.
  2. 구철모.최정일 (2008), "조직의 흡수역량이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증연구", 경영학연구, 제37권 제3호, pp. 515-536.
  3. 김보원 (2011) 지속 가능한 가치사슬 전략, 동서미디어.
  4. 권기환.이춘우 (2008), "중소기업 사례연구: 의의, 절차, 그리고 개선방향", 중소기업연구, 제30권 제1호, pp. 141-164.
  5. 민재형.이영찬 (2004), "지식경영의 역량, 활동, 성과에 관한 실증연구", 고객만족경영연구, 제6권 제1호, pp. 123-155.
  6. 박경환 (2009), "조직적응 관점에서 사회적 문제해결이 직무소진, 조직몰입, 이직성향, 그리고 직무성과에 미치는 영향", 대한경영학회지, 제22권 제4호, pp. 2109-2137.
  7. 박세근 (2008), "중국의 조선 산업과 우리기업의 대응방안", 한국수출입은행 해외경제 보고서, pp. 51-73.
  8. 박태원 (2002), "한국과 중국의 조선 산업 경쟁력 비교", 월간해양수산, 제21권 4호, pp. 46-55.
  9. 배영일.이치호.박찬수 (2009), "한국 조선산업의 경쟁력 진단", 삼성경제연구소 CEO information, 제690호, pp. 1-10.
  10. 백서인 (2017), "세계 주요국의 자율주행차 정책 및 기업전략에 관한 통합적 연구", 지식경영연구, 제18권 제3호, pp. 1-36. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2017.18.3.001
  11. 백서인.김희태,.권상집 (2014), "중국 3 대 경제권 자동차 산업에 대한 연구: 기술학습, 아키텍처, 클러스터를 중심으로", 지식경영연구, 제15권 제4호, pp. 147-170. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2014.15.4.008
  12. 백서인.이성민,.장현준 (2016), "중국 자동차 산업의 기술혁신, 성장전략 및 산업정책의 시사점", 지식경영연구, 제17권 제2호, pp. 75-101. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2016.17.2.004
  13. 이윤관.양종서 (2014), "중국 조선산업 및 국내 중소조선산업 경쟁력 현황", 한국수출입은행 중점연구, 제4권, pp. 5-55.
  14. 이정동 (2015), 축적의 시간, 지식노마드: 서울
  15. 이재억.임채윤.김왕동.김동규. (2003), "세계적 일류기업을 향한 기술혁신전략", 한국개발연구원 정책연구, pp. 1-189.
  16. 중앙일보중국팀 (2017), 중국의 반격: 더 이상 중국 보너스는 없다, 틔움출판: 서울
  17. 최수형.조영상. (2014), "한국 조선해양산업의 경쟁력에 관한 실증연구", 산업경제연구, 제27권 제1호, pp. 77-99.
  18. 홍성인 (2002), "중국 조선산업의 현황 및 품목별 비교분석", 산업연구원 산업경제, pp. 35-50.
  19. 홍성인 (2015). "조선산업의 글로벌 위상 변화와 향후 전략", 산업연구원 산업경제정보, pp. 1-11.
  20. 홍순욱.조근태 (2009). "조직역량과 조직성과: 한국과 미국 제조업 R&D 조직의 비교 연구", 기술혁신학회지, 제12권 제4호, pp. 740-767.
  21. Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993), "Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140105
  22. Baldwin, C.Y. and Clark K.B. (2000), Design Rules: The Power of Modularity, MIT Press: Cambridge.
  23. Barney, J. B. (1991), "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage", Journal of Management, Vo. 17, No. 1, pp.:99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  24. Barney, J. B. and Hesterly, W. S. (2006), Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage: Concepts and Cases, Pearson Education Inc, pp. 121-164.
  25. Brusoni, S., and Prencipe, A. (2001). "Unpacking the Black Box of Modularity: Technologies, Products and Organizations", Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 179-205. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.1.179
  26. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990), "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  27. Collis, D. J. (1994). "Research Note: How Valuable Are Organizational Capabilities?", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150910
  28. Dale Stoel, M. and Muhanna, W.A. (2009), "IT Capabilities and Firm Performance: A Contingency Analysis of the Role of Industry and IT Capability Type", Information & Management, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.10.002
  29. Doran, D.,Hill, A., Hwang, K.S. and Jacob, G. (2007), "Supply Chain Modularization: Cases from the French Automobile Industry", International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 106, pp. 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.04.006
  30. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), "Building Theories from Case Study Research", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, pp. 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
  31. Fine, C. H. (1998), Clock Speed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage, Basic Books, 45-70.
  32. Fixson, S. K., and Park, J. K. (2008), "The Power of Integrality: Linkages between Product Architecture, Innovation, and Industry Structure", Research Policy, Vol. 37, No. 8, pp. 1296-1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.026
  33. Fujimoto, T. (2006), "Architecture Based Comparative Advantage in Japan and Asia", MMRC Discussion Paper, Vol. 94, pp. 1-8.
  34. Fujimoto, T., and Nobeoka, K. (2006), "Power of Continuance in Competitive Power Analysis: Product Development and Evolution of Organizational Capability", Organization Science, Vol. 39, pp. 43-55.
  35. Fujimoto, T., and Park, Y. W. (2011), "Complexity and Control: Comparative Study of Automobiles and Electronic Products", MMRC Discussion Paper, Vol. 352, pp. 1-33.
  36. Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. (1965), "The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis", Social Problems, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 436-445. https://doi.org/10.2307/798843
  37. Gold, A., Malhotra, A. and A. Segars. (2001), "Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspectives", Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 185-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
  38. Guan, J. and Ma, N. (2003), "Innovative Capability and Export Performance of Chinese Firms", Technovation, 23(9), 737-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00013-5
  39. Gulati, R. K. (1996), "The Coupling of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure Decisions, Doctoral dissertation", Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  40. Henderson, R. M., and Clark, K. B. (1990), "Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms", Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 9-30.
  41. Hoetker, G. (2006), "Do Modular Products Lead to Modular Organizations?, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 501-518. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.528
  42. Howard, M. and Squire B. (2007), "Modularization and the Impact on Supply Relationships", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 27, No.11, pp. 1192-1212. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570710830593
  43. Khanna, T., Song, J., and Lee, K. (2011), "The Paradox of Samsung's Rise", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 89, No. 7, pp. 142-147.
  44. Kim, L. (1998), "Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning: Capability Building in Catching-up at Hyundai Motor", Organization Science, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 506-521. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.4.506
  45. Kusunoki, K., Nonaka, I., and Nagata, A. (1998), "Organizational Capabilities in Product Development of Japanese Firms: a Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings", Organization Science, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 699-718. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.6.699
  46. Lee, Y., Cho, T. L., Lee, J. H., and Kwon, O. Y. (2008), "Trends and Technologies in LNG Carriers and Offshore LNG Facilities", Offshore Technology Conference.
  47. Lee, H., and Choi, B. (2003), "Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination", Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 179-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045756
  48. Lee, K., and Lim, C. (2001), "Technological Regimes, Catching-up and Leapfrogging: Findings From the Korean Industries", Research Policy, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 459-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00088-3
  49. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992), "Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131009
  50. Lim C., Z. Kim and K. Lee (2017), "Changes in Industrial Leadership and Catch-up by Latecomers in Shipbuilding Industry", Asia Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol. 25, No.1, pp. 1-18
  51. Linstone, H. A., and Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, Addison-Wesley.
  52. Park, Y., Fujimoto, T., and Hong, P. (2012). "Product Architecture, Organizational Capabilities and IT Integration for Competitive Advantage", International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 479-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.12.002
  53. Sanchez, R. (1999), "Modular Architectures in the Marketing Process", Journal of Marketing, pp. 92-111.
  54. Sanchez, R. (2000), "Modular Architectures, Knowledge Assets and Organisational Learning: New Management Processes for Product Creation", International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 610-629. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2000.002839
  55. Sanchez, R., and Mahoney, J. T. (1996), "Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management in Product and Organization Design", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171107
  56. Sher, P.J. and Yang, P.Y. (2005), "The Effects of Innovative Capabilities and R&D Clustering on Firm Performance: the Evidence of Taiwan's Semiconductor Industry", Technovation, Vol. 25, No.1, pp. 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00068-3
  57. Shibata, T., Yano, M., and Kodama, F (2005), "Empirical Analysis of Evolution of Product Architecture: Fanuc Numerical Controllers from 1962 to 1997", Research Policy, Vol. 34, No.1, pp. 13-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.011
  58. Sosa, M. E., Eppinger, S. D., and Rowles, C. M. (2004), "The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development", Management Science, Vol. 50, No. 12, pp. 1674-1689. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0289
  59. Sturgeon, T. J. (2002), "Modular Production Networks: A New American Model of Industrial Organization", Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 451-496. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.3.451
  60. Tsai, K. H. (2004), "The Impact of Technological Capability on Firm Performance in Taiwan's Electronics Industry", Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2004.03.002
  61. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A (1997), "Firm Capabilities, Resources and the Concept of Strategy", Strategic Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  62. Ulrich, K (1995), "The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm", Research Policy, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 419-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3
  63. Worren, N., Moore, K., and Cardona, P. (2002), "Modularity, Strategic Flexibility, and Firm Performance: a Study of the Home Appliance Industry", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, No. 12, pp. 1123-1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.276
  64. Yin, R (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Beverly Hills, pp. 27-70.