Korean Circulation Journal

The Korean Society of Cardiology (대한심장학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Transradial Approach for Coronary Intervention: More Comfort, Better Outcome

  • Lee, Cheol Whan (Division of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Cho, Sang-Cheol (Division of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan)
  • Received : 2018.04.10
  • Accepted : 2018.04.16
  • Published : 2018.08.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Campeau L. Percutanous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;16:3-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810160103
  2. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;30:173-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810300220
  3. Pandie S, Mehta SR, Cantor WJ, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography/intervention in women with acute coronary syndromes: insights from the RIVAL Trial (Radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:505-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.11.017
  4. Kanei Y, Kwan T, Nakra NC, et al. Transradial cardiac catheterization: a review of access site complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;78:840-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22978
  5. Jang HJ, Kim JY, Han JD, et al. Numbness after transradial cardiac catheterization: the results from a nerve conduction study of the superficial radial nerve. Korean Circ J 2016;46:161-8. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2016.46.2.161
  6. Xu Y, Jin C, Qiao S, et al. A comparison of transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese women based on a propensity score analysis. Korean Circ J 2018;48:719-27. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2018.0040
  7. Feldman DN, Swaminathan RV, Kaltenbach LA, et al. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012). Circulation 2013;127:2295-306. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000536
  8. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011;377:1409-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2
  9. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:2481-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.017
  10. Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2015;385:2465-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6