한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제38권4호
  • /
  • Pages.587-598
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

예비과학교사의 비유 생성 수업 계획 및 시연에서 나타나는 특징

The Characteristics of Pre-Service Science Teachers' Lesson Planning and Demonstration Using Self-Generated Analogy

  • 투고 : 2018.07.06
  • 심사 : 2018.08.26
  • 발행 : 2018.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 비유 생성 수업을 위한 예비과학교사의 교수 설계에서 나타나는 특징을 조사하였다. 서울특별시에 소재한 사범대학에서 교수 설계와 관련된 강의를 수강 중인 3명의 예비과학교사가 연구에 참여하였다. 비유 생성 수업에 대한 워크숍을 실시한 후 비유 생성 수업을 계획하고 시연하도록 하였다. 예비교사들이 제작한 교수학습 자료를 수집하였고, 수업 장면은 녹화하였으며, 수업 시연 전후에 반 구조화된 면담을 실시하였다. 예비교사의 비유 생성 수업에서 나타나는 특징을 PCK 측면에서 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 예비교사들은 학생들의 비유 생성을 촉진하기 위해 비유의 예시와 유형을 소개하는 등 다양한 전략을 활용하였다. 그러나 소집단 비유를 수정 및 보완하는 과정을 수업에 포함하지 않는 등 비유 생성 수업의 단계에 대한 이해가 부족하였고, 교사의 적극적인 역할 또한 일부 예비교사의 수업에서만 나타났다. 세 명의 예비교사 모두 평가를 고려하였으나, 단순히 개념 이해도만을 평가하는 등 제한된 평가 방법과 평가 측면을 활용하였다. 일부 예비교사는 학생들의 오개념을 적극적으로 고려하였고, 학생들이 생성할 비유를 구체적으로 예상하기도 하였다. 예비교사들은 비유 생성 활동의 수준, 과학 개념의 특성 등 다양한 측면을 고려하여 비유 생성 수업의 주제를 선정하였다. 이상의 결과를 바탕으로 예비과학교사 교육과정과 관련된 함의를 논의하였다.

In this study, we investigated the characteristics of pre-service science teachers' curriculum design for lessons using self-generated analogy. Three pre-service science teachers at a college of education in Seoul participated in this study. After a workshop on lessons using self-generated analogy, they planned and demonstrated lessons. All of the teaching-learning materials were collected, and their lessons were observed and videotaped. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted before and after their lessons. The characteristics of lessons using self-generated analogy were analyzed in the perspectives of PCK. The analyses of the results revealed that they used various strategies to promote students' generating analogies. They lacked understanding of the stages of the lessons and the role of teachers. Although all of them considered assessment, they used limited assessment methods and assessment dimensions. Some actively considered students' misconceptions, and specifically anticipated analogies that students could generate. They determined topics for lessons considering various aspects such as the level of self-generated analogy and the characteristics of scientific conceptions. On the bases of the results, we suggest some educational implications for pre-service science teacher education.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aragon, M. D. M., Oliva, J. M., & Navarrete, A. (2014). Contributions of learning through analogies to the construction of secondary education pupils' verbal discourse about chemical change. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1960-1984. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.887237
  2. Blake, A. (2004). Helping young children to see what is relevant and why: Supporting cognitive change in earth science using analogy. International Journal of Science Education, 26(15), 1855-1873. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000266173
  3. Byun, C. S., & Kim, H. (2010). The effects of student-centered instruction using analogy for middle school students’ learning of the photosynthesis concept. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(2), 304-322.
  4. Choi, K. (2004). The effects of students’ self-created analogies on their understanding of electricity-related concepts. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 48(5), 401-410.
  5. Choi, S., Lee, J., & Noh, T. (2015). A case study of preservice secondary science teachers’ demonstration of STEAM lessons. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 665-676. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0665
  6. Chung, H., & Ryu, S. (2017). Pedagogical content knowledge of socio-scientific issues: Characterizing teachers’ experiences. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(4), 679-691. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.4.679
  7. Dagher, Z. R. (1995). Analysis of analogies used by science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320306
  8. Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750606
  9. Fogwill, S. (2010). Student co-generated analogies and their influence on the development of science understanding. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  10. Haglund, J. (2013). Collaborative and self-generated analogies in science education. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 35-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.801119
  11. Haglund, J., & Jeppsson, F. (2012). Using self-generated analogies in teaching of thermodynamics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 898-921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21025
  12. Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1993). Teaching with analogies: A case study in grade-10 optics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1291-1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660301010
  13. James, M. C., & Scharmann, L. C. (2007). Using analogies to improve the teaching performance of preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 565-585. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20167
  14. Jang, H., & Choi, B. (2010). A case study on the development of science teachers' PCK through development of content representation(CoRe): Focusing on molecular motion for 7th grade class. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(6), 870-885.
  15. Kang, H., & Cheon, J. (2010). Characteristics, mapping understanding, mapping errors, and perceptions of student-generated analogies by elementary school students’ approaches to learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(5), 668-680.
  16. Kang, H., & Seo, J. (2012). The effects of instructions using analogies in learning the concept of saturated solution by analogy presentation types and verbal learning styles. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(2), 402-414. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.2.402
  17. Kim, D. (2008). The effects of applying instruction using high school students’ self-generated analogies for concepts in genetics. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(5), 424-437.
  18. Kim, K., Choi, E., Cha, J., & Noh, T. (2006). The effect of an instruction using generating analogy on students’ conceptual understanding in middle school science concept learning. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 50(4), 338-345. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2006.50.4.338
  19. Kim, K., Hwang, S., & Noh, T. (2008). An investigation of the types of student-generated analogies, the mapping understanding, and the mapping errors in concept learning on the reaction rate with generating analogy. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 52(4), 412-422. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2008.52.4.412
  20. Kim, K., Yoon, J., Park, J., & Noh, T. (2011). The components of pedagogical content knowledge considered by secondary science pre-service teachers in planning and implementing teaching demonstrations. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(1), 99-114.
  21. Kim, M., Kwon, H., Lee, D., & Noh, T. (2018). An analysis of high school students’ analogy generating processes using think-aloud method. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.1.43
  22. Kim, Y. (2011). Development and application of a teaching strategy using analogy-generating for science-gifted students. (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Korea.
  23. Kwon, H., Choi, E., & Noh, T. (2003). Analysis of the analogies on three states of matter generated by middle school students. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 47(3), 265-272. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2003.47.3.265
  24. Kwon, H., Choi, E., & Noh, T. (2004). Students’ understanding of the analogies used in chemistry education and the limitations of using analogies. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(2), 287-297.
  25. Kwon, H., Kim, M., Kim, S., & Noh, T. (2017). The patterns of analogy change and the characteristics of discussions in collaborative activity of self-generated analogy. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education. 37(3), 407-416. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.3.407
  26. Lancor, R. A. (2014). Using student-generated analogies to investigate conceptions of energy: A multidisciplinary study. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.714512
  27. Lee, H. (2016). Conceptualization of an SSI-PCK framework for teaching socioscientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(4), 539-550. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0539
  28. Lee, J., & Lee, K. (2017). A case study for exploring topic-specifc PCK progression on elementary teachers’ instruction of ‘earth revolution’. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 36(4), 405-427. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2017.36.4.405
  29. Lin, T. J., Anderson, R. C., Hummel, J. E., Jadallah, M., Miller, B. W., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., ... Dong, T. (2012). Children’s use of analogy during collaborative reasoning. Child Development, 83(4), 1429-1443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01784.x
  30. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  31. Maia, P. F., & Justi, R. (2009). Learning of chemical equilibrium through modelling-based teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 603-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802538045
  32. Noh, T., & Kwon, H. (1999). A study on science teachers’ practices and perceptions of using analogies. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 19(4), 665-673.
  33. Oliva, J. M., Azcarate, P., & Navarrete, A. (2007). Teaching models in the use of analogies as a resource in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 29(1), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708444
  34. Park, S., & Chen, Y. C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922-941. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21022
  35. Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
  36. Ryu, S., Chang, H., & Choi, K. (2008). The effects of self-generated analogies on the concept of photoelectric effect in ｢Modern Physics｣ unit of high school physics course. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 12(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2008.12.1.83
  37. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
  38. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  39. Spier-Dance, L., Mayer-Smith, J., Dance, N., & Khan, S. (2005). The role of student-generated analogies in promoting conceptual understanding for undergraduate chemistry students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(2), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140500266401
  40. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Open coding. In A. Strauss & J. Corbin (Eds.), Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (pp. 101-121). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  41. Thiele, R. B., & Treagust, D. F. (1994). An interpretive examination of high school chemistry teachers’ analogical explanations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(3), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310304
  42. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U
  43. Wong, E. D. (1993). Self-generated analogies as a tool for constructing and evaluating explanations of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(4), 367-380. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300405
  44. Yan, C. (2015). Development and application of the strategy with coteaching and mentoring to improve the teaching professionalism of beginning teachers in science-gifted education. (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Korea.
  45. Yang, C., Kim, S., Jo, M., & Noh, T. (2016). The characteristics of group and classroom discussions in the scientific modeling of the particulate model of matter. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 361-369. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0361
  46. Yoon, J.-A., & Kang, H. (2011). The effects of analogy-generating in small group on saturated solution in elementary science-gifted education. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 55(3), 509-518. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2011.55.3.509
  47. Zook, K. B. (1991). Effects of analogical processes on learning and misrepresentation. Educational Psychology Review, 3(1), 41-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323662

피인용 문헌

  1. 학생 중심 비유를 사용한 예비과학교사의 수업에서 나타나는 특징 분석 vol.64, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.2.99