International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering

The Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of a safe operation capability chart as the design basis of a rudder area

  • You, Youngjun (Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Co., LTD. (DSME)) ;
  • Kim, Sewon (Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Co., LTD. (DSME)) ;
  • Kim, Woojin (Hyundai Heavy Industries (HHI))
  • Received : 2017.02.21
  • Accepted : 2017.09.13
  • Published : 2018.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Ship owners now demand a new design approach for the rudder that considers detailed design information such as maneuverability and environmental loads etc. on a quantified basis. In this paper, we developed the concept of a safe operation capability chart for the design of a rudder area. The chart can be used as the basis of design considering the maneuverability and environmental loads. To confirm the applicability of the safe operation capability chart for use as the basis of design, four different rudders are assumed in this work. First, it is determined whether or not it is appropriate to design a rudder by applying a conventional design approach based on IMO maneuvering tests. The proposed concept is reviewed for use as the basis of the design by investigating the effect of rudder area on capability charts that are plotted according to the rudder under various environmental conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. Andersen, O.J., Lovseth, J., 1992. The Maritime Turbulent Wind Field. Measurements and Models. Final Report for Task 4 of the Statoil Joint Industry Project. Norwegian Institute of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  2. Bhattacharyya, R., 1978. Dynamics of Marine Vehicles. Wiley.
  3. DET NORSKE VERITAS (DNV), 2011. In: Recommended Practice DNV-RPH103 (Modelling and Analyses of Marine Operation), APRIL 2011.
  4. Fujii, J., Tsuda, T., 1961. Experimental researchs on rudder performance (2). J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Jpn. 110.
  5. Fujii, J., Tsuda, T., 1962. Experimental researchs on rudder performance (3). J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Jpn. 111.
  6. Fujiwara, T., Ueno, M., Nimura, T., 2001. An estimation method of wind forces and moments acting on ships. In: Mini Symposium on Prediction of Ship Manoeuvring Performance.
  7. Germanischer Lloyd (GL), 2013. Ship Technology - PART1 Seagoing Ships - Chapter 1 Hull Structure e Section 14 Rudder and Manoeuvring Arrangement. Germanischer Lloyd (GL).
  8. GL Noble Denton, 2010. Techniocal Policy Board Guidelines for Marine Transportations 0030/ND.
  9. Hasegawa, K., Kouzuki, A., 1987. Automatic colli-sion avoidance system for ships using fuzzy control (in Japanese). J. Kansai Soc. Nav. Archit. 205, 1-10.
  10. Hendzik, J., 2013. Evaluating criteria for DP vessels. J. KONES Powertrain Transp. 20 (4), 118-122.
  11. Hwang, W., 1980. Application of System Identification to Ship Maneuvering (PhD. Thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  12. IACS, 1990. IACS Requirements v.1.1. S10.
  13. IMO, 2002. MSC. 137(76) Standards for Ship Manoeuvrability. Adapted on 4 December 2002.
  14. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15016, 2015. Ships and Marine Technology e Guidelines for the Assessment of Speed and Power Performance by Analysis of Speed Trial Data.
  15. International towing tank Conference (ITTC), 2011. Prediction of Power Increase in Irregular Waves from Model Test. ITTC - Recommended Procedure 7.5-02-07-02.2.
  16. Jung, R., 2011. Recent international development on the technical and operational measures of IMO's CO2 emission control from ships. J. Korean Soc. Mar. Environ. Eng. 14 (1), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.7846/JKOSMEE.2011.14.1.065
  17. Kijima, K., Nakiri, Y., Tsutsui, Y., Matsunaga, M., 1990. Prediciton method of ship manoeuvrability in deep and shallow water. MARSIM ICSM 1990.
  18. Kim, H.S., Park, G.I., Ha, M.G., 2001. Computerized measurement system of ship speed and maneuvering performance in sea trial. J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Korea 38(3), 54-61.
  19. Kim, Y.G., Kim, S.Y., Kim, H.T., Yu, B.S., Lee, S.W., 2006. Study on the maneuvering characteristics of a container ship with twin skegs. J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Korea 43 (1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2006.43.1.015
  20. Kim, Y.G., Yeo, D.J., Kim, S.Y., Yun, K.H., Oh, B.I., 2009. Prediction of maneuverability of KCS by CPMC captive model test. J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Korea 46(6), 553-561. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2009.46.6.553
  21. Papanikolaou, A., Shigunov, V., 2014. Criteria for minimum powering and maneuverability in adverse weather conditions. In: The 14th International Ship Stability Workshop (ISSW), 29th Sep. 2014- 1st Oct. 2014. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  22. Papanikolaou, A., Zaraphonitis, G., Bitner-Gregersen, E., Shigunov, V., Moctar, O. El, Soares, C.G., Reddy, D.N., Sprenger, F., Energy efficient safe ship operation (SHOPERA), Influence of EEDI on Ship Design, 24-25 Sep., London, UK.
  23. Prpic-Orsic, J., Vttor, R., Faltinsen, O.M., 2016. The influence of route choice and operating conditions on fuel consumption and CO2 emission of ships,. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 21, 434-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-015-0367-5
  24. Sung, Y.J., Park, S.H., 2015. Prediction of ship manoeuvring performance based on virtual captive model tests. J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Korea 52(5), 407-417. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2015.52.5.407
  25. Sutulo, S., Soares, C.G., 2015. Preliminary Analysis of Ship Manoeuvrability Criteria in Wind. Maritime Technology and Engineering, London.
  26. Sutulo, S., Soares, C.G., 2016. Analysis of Manoeuvrability Criteria and Standards in View of Environmental Factors and EEDI Impact. Maritime Technology and Engineering, London.
  27. You, Y., Kim, W., 2016. A simplified maneuvering performance of a large container ship passing through the Suez canal. In: 4th International Conference on Ship Manoeuvring in Shallow and Confined Water with Special Focus on Ship Bottom Interaction (MASHCON). Hamburg.
  28. You, Y., Rhee, K.P., 2016. Development of the collision ratio to infer the time at which to begin a collision avoidance of a ship. Appl. Ocean Res. 60, 164-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2016.09.005
  29. You, Y., Kim, S., Kim, W., 2017. A study on quantifying sailing safety considering maneuverability of a vessel,. J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Korea 54(2), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2017.54.2.113

Cited by

  1. A Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption by Conventional and Anchor Based Dynamic Positioning of Ship vol.14, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030524