DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Various Approaches and Treatments for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women

  • Chung, Soo-Ho (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Woong Bin (Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2018.09.09
  • Accepted : 2018.11.02
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is bulging of one or more of the pelvic organs into the vagina and triggered by multiple causes. It is a very common disorder, especially among older women. POP is characterized by protrusion of the presentation part visible by the naked eye, and problems with urination or bowel movements. POP can be diagnosed based on the onset of symptoms and a pelvic exam, and management options include medical and surgical treatment. Although medical treatment cannot correct the abnormal herniation of the pelvic structures, this can help alleviate symptoms. One of the disadvantages of surgical interventions is recurrence, and advances in surgical techniques have decreased recurrence rates of POP. Therefore, author will explain the gynecology and urology approach and treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. Bump RC, Norton PA. Epidemiology and natural history of pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998; 25: 723-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8545(05)70039-5
  2. Lepine LA, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Koonin LM, Morrow B, Kieke BA, et al. Hysterectomy surveillance-United States, 1980-1993. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 1997; 46: 1-15.
  3. Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet 2007; 369: 1027-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60462-0
  4. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 1160-6. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.123819
  5. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 501-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6
  6. Clark AL, Gregory T, Smith VJ, Edwards R. Epidemiologic evaluation of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 1261-7. https://doi.org/10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00829-9
  7. Greer WJ, Richter HE, Bartolucci AA, Burgio KL. Obesity and pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 341-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31817cfdde
  8. Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M. Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 579-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11536.x
  9. Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 372-7. https://doi.org/10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00698-7
  10. Giri A, Hartmann KE, Hellwege JN, Velez Edwards DR, Edwards TL. Obesity and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217: 11-26.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.039
  11. Kudish BI, Iglesia CB, Sokol RJ, Cochrane B, Richter HE, Larson J, et al. Effect of weight change on natural history of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 81-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318190a0dd
  12. Jorgensen S, Hein HO, Gyntelberg F. Heavy lifting at work and risk of genital prolapse and herniated lumbar disc in assistant nurses. Occup Med (Lond) 1994; 44: 47-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/44.1.47
  13. Ellerkmann RM, Cundiff GW, Melick CF, Nihira MA, Leffler K, Bent AE. Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 1332-7. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.119078
  14. Bradley CS, Nygaard IE. Vaginal wall descensus and pelvic floor symptoms in older women. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 759-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000180183.03897.72
  15. Whitcomb EL, Lukacz ES, Lawrence JM, Nager CW, Luber KM. Prevalence and degree of bother from pelvic floor disorders in obese women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009; 20: 289-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0765-x
  16. Novi JM, Jeronis S, Morgan MA, Arya LA. Sexual function in women with pelvic organ prolapse compared to women without pelvic organ prolapse. J Urol 2005; 173: 1669-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000154618.40300.c8
  17. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 10-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70243-0
  18. Steele A, Mallipeddi P, Welgoss J, Soled S, Kohli N, Karram M. Teaching the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 1458-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70010-9
  19. Abdulaziz M, Stothers L, Lazare D, Macnab A. An integrative review and severity classification of complications related to pessary use in the treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse. Can Urol Assoc J 2015; 9: E400-6. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.2783
  20. Li C, Gong Y, Wang B. The efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 2016; 27: 981-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2846-y
  21. Jelovsek E. Pelvic organ prolapse in women: Choosing a primary surgical procedure. Waltham, MA: UpTo- Date, Inc, 2018. [Cited by 2018 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/pelvic-organprolapse-in-women-choosing-a-primary-surgicalprocedure?search=Pelvic%20organ%20prolapse%20in%20women:%20Choosing%20a%20primary%20surgical%20procedure&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1-150&usage_type=default&display_rank=1.
  22. Gilchrist AS, Campbell W, Steele H, Brazell H, Foote J, Swift S. Outcomes of observation as therapy for pelvic organ prolapse: a study in the natural history of pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn 2013; 32: 383-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22298
  23. De La Cruz JF, Myers EM, Geller EJ. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: 1010-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.04.011
  24. Fairchild PS, Kamdar NS, Berger MB, Morgan DM. Rates of colpopexy and colporrhaphy at the time of hysterectomy for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214: 262.e1-262.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.053
  25. Citgez S, Demirkesen O, Ozdemir F, Gevher F, Demirdag C, Onal B, et al. Transvaginal repair using acellular collagen biomesh for the treatment of anterior prolapse. Urol J 2014; 11: 1271-7.
  26. Young SB, Daman JJ, Bony LG. Vaginal paravaginal repair: one-year outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 1360-6. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.119073
  27. Bruce RG, El-Galley RE, Galloway NT. Paravaginal defect repair in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence and cystocele. Urology 1999; 54: 647-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00225-3
  28. Scotti RJ, Garely AD, Greston WM, Flora RF, Olson TR. Paravaginal repair of lateral vaginal wall defects by fixation to the ischial periosteum and obturator membrane. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 1436-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70007-9
  29. Miklos JR, Kohli N. Laparoscopic paravaginal repair plus burch colposuspension: review and descriptive technique. Urology 2000; 56: 64-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00510-0
  30. Porges RF, Smilen SW. Long-term analysis of the surgical management of pelvic support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 1518-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(94)90395-6
  31. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, Ballard LA. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 1299-304. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.119081
  32. Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, Winkler HA, Tomezsko J, Culligan PJ, et al. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 1357-62. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.115118
  33. Altman D, Vayrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C. Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvicorgan prolapse. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 1826-36. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009521
  34. Lovatsis D, Drutz HP. Is transabdominal repair of mild to moderate cystocele necessary for correction of prolapse during a modified Burch procedure? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001; 12: 193-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001920170063
  35. Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, Vervest HA, Vierhout ME. Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 242-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318203e6a5
  36. Rodriguez LV, Bukkapatnam R, Shah SM, Raz S. Transvaginal paravaginal repair of high-grade cystocele central and lateral defects with concomitant suburethral sling: report of early results, outcomes, and patient satisfaction with a new technique. Urology 2005; 66: 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.126

Cited by

  1. Abdominal and vaginal pelvic support with concomitant hysterectomy for uterovaginal pelvic prolapse: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis vol.32, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04861-4
  2. Comparison of mood state in severe pelvic organ prolapse patients before and after surgery vol.1, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gocm.2021.11.005
  3. The effect of women’s body mass index on pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta analysis vol.18, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01104-z